User talk:Mugiwara Franky

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Actually
Tip brought them in for episodes, but I started using them for other things once I cracked how to use them myself (took me an hour). :-) One-Winged Hawk 06:19, April 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * Tip brought in tabbing... Redesigned the forums (I didn't know myself what to do with them)... Tip has certainly made the rest of us look a lot less useful huh? Lol. One-Winged Hawk 06:25, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

A Wiki-Wide Mistake
Escuse me. Mugiwara Franky? Are you the head admin of the One Piece Encyclopedia? If so, I must bring something to your attention.

I am Cyberweasel89, head admin of the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki, the "serious fan version" of the One Piece Fanon Wiki. I would say the most major difference is that we all can speak English on OPFFW, but we also follow a format and a code of quality.

It has come to my attention that your Wiki has a grave mistake present that severely lessens the quality of your Wiki. Thsi mistake is present in almost every article, save for a few. As such, it would no doubt require a massive amount of editing to correct.

As much as I would like to say I am only doing this for the quality of the One Piece Encyclopedia, I must admit that this mistake also affects my own Wiki.

If you would like to hear me out, I would be happy to inform you of this grave mistake. I would rather not waste your time by telling you without permission. Rest assured, it will not be a long explanation.

Thank you for your time, and I hope to hear from you. Please contact me via my Talk page on the One Piece Encyclopedia.

--Cyberweasel89 03:39, April 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Allow me to explain.


 * In several articles, you have a box in the lower right corner that says "Write the fanon", with a link just below that. This link either leads to the One Piece Fanon Wiki, or it leads to the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki. Which Wiki it leads to tends to vary according to the article. But the link always directs to an article on either Wiki that is the same as the article the reader is currently viewing. For example, the One Piece Encyclopedia article for Monkey D. Luffy would have a "Write the fanon" box with a link to the Monkey D. Luffy article on the One Piece Fanon Wiki or the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki.


 * While I appreciate the links to my Wiki, the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki, I must point out a grave mistake. I am not sure whether this mistake is due to lack of research, or whether it is simply due to a misunderstanding.


 * But I must regret to inform you that all such "Write the fanon" links to the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki will always be dead links regardless of how much time passes. The reason is simple.


 * As per my rules, enacted since the conception of the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki, "canon" articles are not allowed on the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki. So a "Write the fanon" link to the Monkey D. Luffy article on the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki will always be a dead link because there will never be a Monkey D. Luffy article on the One Piece Fan Fiction Wiki.


 * I suppose it is an understandable mistake, considering the nature of my Wiki's opposite counterpart, the One Piece Fanon Wiki. But as "oppposite counterpart" implies, we are very different from them. I suggest you correct this mistake. It looks very unproffesional to have so many dead links littering the great One Piece Encyclopedia.


 * Thank you for your time, and I hope to hear your decision on this matter.


 * --Cyberweasel89 15:57, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

event and fight pages
Is it possible to lock this pages to force the users to discuss the guidelines first. Angel and myself asked it but it's not comming and Joekido just added to the mess by recreating the Events page. It starts to be a bit crazy Kdom 05:33, April 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * No one is listening to the request of the concerned editors and no one is tackling the page problems, I'm giving these pages until Monday after that I'm just putting them on Pages to be Deleted. Then we'll see what happens once thier on the page.


 * The reason why they exist is because we never had guidelines to prevent them and thus we can't get rid of them on anything bt "the problems with them are too huge". And I must say I'm at the very least not a happy puppy with how the lack of resolution is continuing with everyone ignoring the pleas to C and D so we could get it all together. IF the other editors want them to stay, then they've got stop and think this over and to be quite frank, they were worthy of deleting the day they were created and that is half the problem. :-/ One-Winged Hawk 07:01, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Deleting some temp pages
Please delete Forum:Test1, Forum:Test2, Template:RuxaxTest, Template:RuxaxExperimental, Template:Forumheader2, Template:Forumheader2/Candidates for Deletion. These are pages created by me for test purposes or by mistake. They are not needed anymore. Ruxax 12:38, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
Someone made me notice of vandalism performed by 205.202.120.216. Also he reverted them back, maybe it should be worth checking he does not do it again. Kdom 21:08, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

You can add User:XxchoppyxX to the speedy ban list, check the Special:NewFiles. Kdom 18:36, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know if you noticed Angel post in the banned section. But judging from his last contributions, something has to be done. Kdom 06:15, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Stelly
Can you remove the shameful 'Romanized Name:' from Stelly’s page? No Japanese name no romaji is the basic rule.

If one editor added something that is against the rules and the user already warned not to do that multiply times in the past then you should do something else instead of lock the page. Tipota 04:22, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

I reloaded a new picture for Stelly: File:Stelly.png, it has no more watermarks. Can you please put it in the page? Yatanogarasu 18:36, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've upload a new one completely: File:Stelly.JPG. It has no watermarks to begin with. Can you consider using it? Yatanogarasu 20:07, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

So, why exactly has the page been locked? It didn't seem like there was about to be an edit war over the uploaded pictures or anything, at least not to me. Just wondering is all.DancePowderer 05:27, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pages to delete
Please consider deleting of some pages: I also nominated several pages in recent posts in Forum:Candidates for Deletion. I believe some of them don't even need a discussion. Ruxax 15:55, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * temp: Forum:Test3, Forum:Test4
 * spam: Milsonsungthepirateking
 * remainings of events/fights pages: Maxim Battle, Usopp vs. Luffy

If it was possible to diminish the number of the duplicated files that would be great too. Kdom 20:42, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

I have renamed a lot of image with their actual name (ships, whitebeard commanders portraits...). The old files can be deleted. Kdom 17:39, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems I forgot to change a page when I renamed one of the files, could it be possible to restore File:Edward Newgate Back.jpg instead of File:16-17 Edward Newgate.jpg‎ . Thanks Kdom 05:42, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Toggling
It seems the toggling feature is missing in the wiki Common.css. I think it would be good to add it (Tipota is also interested, Cf our respective talk page) as it looks much friendlier to use than the current NavFrame. What is your opinion ? Kdom 18:54, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Also it seems we need some quick speedy ban action, unfortunatly...

Id does not seem to work (Cf some tests). I'm afraid I don't know much how it works either. Maybe asking someone like Tipota or Ruxax. Kdom 17:47, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Volume covers
I am changing them because the original files were tiny, and unlookable to people that would want to see the full details.I am merely replacing with larger versions.

Genocyber 00:15, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Volume covers
How does it slow down the page? All of them are thumbnails unless clicked on.

Genocyber 00:37, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Chapter Covers
Why is it a problem to use raw scans of chapter covers, on their respective pages, before a picture of higher quality is available? It lets fans see the image, even in lower quality, than having to trawl through the internet. Sables 08:50, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Contribution Awards?
Have you ever trialled a contribution award system here? If not I think it's at least worth a shot, and it would be fun. Sables 12:34, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

delete category
Please delete Category:Non Cannon Templates: all pages from it were moved to correctly spelled Category:Non-Canon Templates. Ruxax 19:11, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Kuma The Revolutionary
I have removed all references of Kuma being a revolutionary, as it as of yet unconfirmed whether the figure in the new chapter is Kuma. Have I done the right thing in this case, or should I return all the pages to their original states? SuicidalSkydiver (talk) 00:36, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

I thought the same too when I first saw the panel (I uploaded the picture of him and made a blog post about it) but I assumed we couldn't write it down as fact unless it has been properly confirmed. Would you like me to revert all of the changes I made? SuicidalSkydiver (talk) 00:58, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Minor Weapons Page
Minor weapons, such as T-Bone's Sword, Helmeppo's Swords, and Kaku's Swords, are pinned for deletion and what not now and then. What should we do about these pages? Should we focus in deleting them, redirect them, or what else? Yatanogarasu 01:08, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

You got it bossman, I'll revert it all now SuicidalSkydiver (talk) 01:09, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Sabo's death
I get the feeling that people are going to argue that Sabo died or not. According to here, the majority shows he died, so should we classify him dead? I know, this is the Bellamy thing, all over again. Yatanogarasu 03:37, June 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * While we're at the subject, what about all these characters listed in this section? How exactly should we classify them: dead or not, based on common sense, rather than wait for Oda? Yatanogarasu 03:39, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

New theory on the dead
Since nobody in the series specifically stated that Bellamy or Gin died, that's why we don't classify them dead. But now Sabo is considered dead by Luffy and Ace, and Dogura himself said so specifically, surely we have to take their word and consider him deceased. Yatanogarasu 20:06, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * How about if by the end of the flashback Sabo's death is not confirmed, we just say he did die? Yatanogarasu 01:56, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Help with email
Could I maybe get some help with this? Thanks. The Pope 02:16, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

New categories
I created 2 new categories: Category:Conjectural titled articles and Category:Flashback Introduction. Can you please help with putting these categories in the pages that require them? There is just too much for me to do alone, and I think I may miss many. Also, can you spread this request to the other users? I don't know if there is a method to mass-send this message to everyone, rather than repeatingly type this message out people by people. Yatanogarasu 10:52, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

"Bramenko" Discussion
Nobody responded so I want to link you to it. 

Also which one of my comments inflamed the argument? SeaTerror 19:30, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

The last one is completely justified when she says something like "Plus, The Pope, you flat out admitted you have an emotional stake in this word, I don't think you're able to be objective in this matter and accurately debate it." Also I don't really see how the second one is inflammatory. SeaTerror 23:52, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

It was either dead even or Translate it winning by 1. I was just pointing out the stupidity of saying something like she said. SeaTerror 17:42, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Exactly how was what I said malicious? It's not like I'm swearing or calling people idiots or something. SeaTerror 17:12, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Hancock Superhuman
According to this blog, people has voted that Hancock has Super-Human Strength, but they keep taking it off the list in the people with such strength. How can we resolve this matter once and for all? Yatanogarasu 05:51, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Nakama
I pretty much said what I had to say on the matter, thats the thing. Remembering to previous experiences, now would be the time to call the topic to a close and weigh up the pros and cons and draw a conclusion... You have a poll, time to close it, give 24 hours for final thoughts and votes to be made and then declare "no more votes" to be made.

Alternatively... Remember the time I did a "right to edit other editors messages"? Or whatever I called it. It listed different scanrios when and where editors were allow to edit others spellings (presonnel talk pages, dicusion pages, documented sections, etc, etc). It means the debate stays open a while longer, but it would allow for a very fine tuning of ideas on WHAT overall everyone wants.


 * Like should we should Nakama for Luffy's crew?
 * On chapter titles?

That sort of thing. One-Winged Hawk 15:04, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Page restoration
Is it possible to restore the talk page of the Strawhat Clothing article. I would like to put it in the Forum, since I forgot what was its conclusion. When I think about it, it would be a good idea to generalise that (ie move the talk page to the Forum) for archive purpose, especially when there is a debate. Kdom 06:39, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Another Request
Can you add this code tr.high-light{

} tr.high-light:hover{background-color: #E0E8FF;}

.high-light tr:hover{background-color: #E0E8FF;}

In the MediaWiki:Common.css. This will not affect any current table but you can use it in table and you can highlight a table row when you mouse over it. You will see the results below (if it works).

-Tipota 01:26, July 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks! 15:20, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

The supposed spam in R's blog
I was only suppose to post one, however when I was pressing the post button, the post would not show up so I pressed many times and still won't work so I refreshed it and bam! There are 5 of them. Stupid computer. Why don't you delete 4 of them for me because I can't delete myself.

Joekido 16:17, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Shakky beng Sonia's daughter
In the new chap Rayleigh refers to Shakky as her daughter. Look it up if you don't believe me.

Genocyber 21:35, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Shakky beng Sonia's daughter
In the manga she says 'thats my shakky', meaning it is her daughter.

I added she admired Luffy because she was openly excited to see him when she learned of his return. As for Gorgon sister being related...they aren't. They are not related since it never said they were actually sisters, but that they escaped from the slave camp together. If you look, their is no physical resemblance to Hancock from either of them.

Genocyber 08:49, July 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Huh, must be either mistranslation or Sandersonia looking up to Shakky. Yatanogarasu 10:39, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Templates Proposal
Sorry to bother you in all of this edit, and you being so busy with being an admin, but I made a proposal in new templates for islands and fighting styles infoboxes: can you look at Forum:New Templates for it? I fear that it would go unnoticed if I don't point directions at it. I appreciate it. Yatanogarasu 10:39, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

I was working with the Template:Ship box and Template:Ship box Name, and to reduce their font size so they match those in the Template:Char box. It all seemed to go well, except that I can't seem to get the "Romanized name" and "English name" to align to the left side margin completely. Please help. Yatanogarasu 05:58, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

New problem, sorry. But look at Template:Crew box, I tried to add a new feature on the 1st and 2nd captains, for crews such as Black Cat Pirates (Kuro and Jango) and Whitebeard Pirates (Edward Newgate and Marco). I don't know how to have the unnecessary template disappear (such as when the crew has only one captain, the "1st Captain" and "2nd Captain" are not needed, or when the crew has 2 captains, the plain "Captain" is not needed). Please help with the template. And if useful, here's a template I created in attempt to make the thing work: Template:Crew box captain. Yatanogarasu 04:10, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Just sme causal talk
Greg caused me to get annoyed over the whole "Strong World no being canon"... Yet as time goes by, he got proven wrong (again). Its the same with Oz, Oz wasn't correct but it doesn't matter if thats the case, he used Odz which was JUST as incorrect. And yet him being full of himself could not see eye to eye with my explaination that Odz was no more "right" when both were wrong. Things have gone... Quiet these days, and I'm not sure if Greg has abused his position of authourity in the OP fandom since X-mas. It still makes me laugh he got "member of the year" at AP when he led a slow anit-wikia war (or so it seemed) against us there over time.

Regardless, I'm pleased with how things are going lately. I've pretty much been made reductant though here. There are lots of things to do but I've not had much time for serious stuff and what I had have recently went into the Vocaloid wikia. Plus by the time I read the manga these days everyone else has already read it 5 times. :-/ One-Winged Hawk 17:15, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Gallery
The new system is messier than I thought. It expands the pictures and takes up massive amounts of space. What I'm trying to say is, that some pictures are taller than others in dimension, and due to that, the gallery expands all pictures, leaving some picture units to be tall, while other units to have massive blank space gaps in between. Also, the pictures are no longer compressed: they are massive sizes on the page, which looks not too nice. Can't we please revert to the original version? Yatanogarasu 03:06, July 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * Look at Nami and Enies Lobby, and you can see how unsightly the new gallery system makes the pages look. Please revert to its original form. Yatanogarasu 04:51, July 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * How is it possible that Nami's gallery is changed, yet the Giants under the "Appearance" remains the same? Yatanogarasu 04:55, July 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think it's a cache problem, if you edit the article with preview, the new gallery code will show up. Kdom 07:41, July 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * I created a Forum:Gallery discussion on that topic. Kdom 20:50, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

The vandal is back
This new guy, User:Yourallneanderthalswitlessbrainlessunintelligent, seems to be the same guy as User:Yourallneanderthalsretardsandnowits and User:Yourallprimitiveneanderthalswitlessbrainless, the vandal who used one of these names and then the other to come back. Is it the same guy with a different user name for all three, or this newest guy just a sheer coincident? I checked the new guy's first edit, Van Auger, and it's not much different than the other two users before this one. I thought you banned him and his IP address permanently from reappearing on this Wikia. Yatanogarasu 00:20, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Master of the Watersportrait
As File:NoPicAvailable.png is used now as a placeholder for unavailable portraits, not the old File:Master of the Watersportrait.png, I ask you to remove the protection from File:Master of the Watersportrait.png, and to apply it to File:NoPicAvailable.png. Ruxax 19:18, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Gu
There's been a discrepancy about the filler character Gu (also known as Chief Petty Officer of G-8). The argument is whether his name is Gu or is he an unnamed character. Now, I don't watch the fillers, so I don't know, but can you please confirm whether this character deserves to have his own page, or what his name is (if we know what it is)? Yatanogarasu 03:07, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * actually there is the same issue for Kurono Nezumi. Check Klobis User_talk:Ichigo kurosaki1979 for the historical. Kdom 05:02, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Hi,

you know those templates that are in the beggining of every anime episode. Well could you add a trascript button or something. It's just that I want to make ( or to have) a transcript for each episode. But there are different kind of dubbed episodes so there could be a funimation one, a 4kids one and a japanese one. So could you do that.

Thanks.

Reply
Super-human speed is about the only one of the pages currently with bound sets of rules, which is half the problem. There wasn't really a order to it and it was just talking about those mentioned with this much strength or speed. I've always made this pretty clear. However, Super Strength is indeed getting silly and as for endurance, this is a exceptionally vague page. Strength was able to exist because certain character WERE specifically note within the story to be "Super" strong (Miss Monday for instance), but I've not known a thing on edurance. This one is a iffy page and honestly, endurance is a hard to judge concept since most of it is a act of will power within One Piece, not endurance.

I draw the line on strength and speed because there was support within the story and it was worth mentioning. There is little support for endurance and we might as well go the full monty and do things like "super Will" if we're going down that path. One-Winged Hawk 16:59, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

File:BoaHancockfullbody.jpg
Could you please lock page to stop the edit war that's been going on? At least until things quite down for a while. MasterDeva 00:28, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Super-Human Strength
Well, maybe I exaggerated with noting the abnormal strength of all of Shiki's mutated animals... However, I don't think it's inapt to say the Golden Lion has Super-Human Strength: he didn't blocked SOMEONE's kick, he blocked SANJI's, who is one of the most proficient expert in kicking in the One Piece world. He can destroys walls kicking without effort, and Oda noted in one of the first SBS that each one of his kicks "has the strength of 21 beats"... Blocking such a strike with a single hand isn't a feat anyone can prove himself capable of. Or, at least, that's what I think ;) Aldarinor 23:17, July 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Always concerning Super-Human Strength... What about X. Drake? Could we consider him owner of such a feat? I mean, he was able to stop the attacks of two fellows Supernovas at the same time, and one of them is a recognized user of Super-Human Strength... He also managed to fend off a Pacifista with simple physical attacks, whereas the above mentioned super-strong man was unsuccesful... He also owns ana Ancient, carnivorous Zoan, and Zoan user have enhanced strength (at least in their Zoan forms, but maybe the physical degree of their transformation is somehow mirrored on their normal form... Or maybe I'm just saying nonsenses xD). So is it all right to say that Drake possesses Super-Human Strength for you? Aldarinor 11:54, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, don't worry, I got it ;) Well, you're probably right about the Zoan part, but in this case the most important one regards the feats he showed in his human state:
 * 1- He blocked two attacks at the same time. And that wouldn't necessary prove Super-Human Strength, however, one of the attacks he blocked was Urouge's, who used his weapon of choice in the attack, and being it a gigantic pillar, I'd say its weight is around 1 ton...
 * 2- He launched a Pacifista away with sheer strenth. If I'm right, in the Manga he attacked it with a barrage of blows from both his sword and his axe/mace (still not clear what that stuff is xD) while in the Anime he kicked it away. In any case, he succeeded where Urouge failed. And Pacifistas should be heavy, too... Also, he did somehow better than the top members of the Straw Hats, who possess Super-Human Strength...
 * Those, at least about me, are some good points ;) Aldarinor 15:00, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Those, at least about me, are some good points ;) Aldarinor 15:00, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Common.css
Maybe I was not clear with the full url but the "full url" in the common.css give me a warning (not an error). Can you undo this edit

This is the relative url  /images/4/4e/Forum_new.gif  and this is the full url  http://images.wikia.com/www/images/4/4e/Forum_new.gif  to the image Forum_new.gif.

User:Mauzmauz
It's about the pictures that User:Mauzmauz has been uploading recently. They all have the "Toei Animation" watermark at the bottom right corner. Is that okay? And, he's placing these pics along with the headlines (check his edits, and you'll know what I mean). Yatanogarasu 17:28, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Char box images
I would like to retrieve the old versions of character box pictures so to have an historical of them on one single picture. File:Wiper1.jpg can give you an idea of what I would like to do. Unfortunatly a lot of the old images have been deleted (well I'm partly responsible of that...). So I would like to know if it was possible to have exceptional right to restore and delete files for a short period of time to achieve this task. I don't think it should take me more than one week. Kdom 21:44, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well there are quite a lot of them that's why I didn't want to bother you with the restoration and do it myself. Especially since they would be deleted immediatly after. As a test there is this one which could be one of the oldest. Kdom 17:53, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Blackbeard Moving
Ok, still I don't really see why not edit already. Maybe something written in japanese would have to wait until be translated so we would afirm that it's official, but in this case, since it was simply written in english, I though it was an exeption. GMTails 02:13, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Complaint about Tipota
Hello MF, please do something about Tipota's actions against my contributions to the wikia. I uploaded and added 6 images from the 2 latest official chapters, and Tipota has deleted all of them, based on extremist views towards the image guidelines. For whatever reason, instead of alerting me so I could change the names and/or re-upload the images, Tipota deleted all of them. This is an extreme abuse of power and has wasted not only my time, but the quality, and encyclopedic enjoyment of the wikia. Tipota's actions are only damaging the site, and he has overstepped far too many boundaries. Sables 15:52, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Uh, Tipota can't delete images, as only adminstrators can delete them so yer beef should go with the one yer just complaining too, Mugiwara Franky.

Joekido 16:10, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Haha, yeah that was a quick slip on my part - I was high :P But the fact remains that guideline-wh*res like Tipota, absolutely abuse power and waste dedicated OP and OP-Wikia fans time by deletion, rather than discussion. My quarrel is a simple example of this viral epidemic. Sables 12:59, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Shiryū
Why was Shiryū's name changed? (I've been away from this wiki for awhile). Shiryū sounds like a much better name (and the correct one) than Shilliew. Franky103 03:07, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Toggling bis
Can you make the tests proposed by Ruxax on my talk page and tell us what are the results on User:Kdom/Sandbox when using firefox ? Thanks Kdom 11:36, August 7, 2010 (UTC) I'm sorry, Ruxax and Tipota started a technical discussion after I made this comment. However it seems from now that Ruxax has found a solution (Cf the end of User_talk:Kdom. Kdom 05:57, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Please, make the following changes to MediaWiki:Common.js:

1) Move string addOnloadHook(foldingTabsMulti); after code of function foldingTabsMulti {...}

2) In code of function toggleInit change function toggleInit {   var togglerElems = new Array;    var toggleGroup = new Array;

// initialize/clear any old information togglers = new Array; allClasses = new Object; to function toggleInit {   var togglerElems = new Array; var toggleGroup = new Array;

// initialize/clear any old information togglers = new Array; allClasses = new Object; allClasses.watch = undefined; allClasses.unwatch = undefined;

Then toggling should work under Firefox also. Ruxax 10:59, August 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, toggling works now. Ruxax 15:16, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

User:Anactualsmartperson
User:Anactualsmartperson, I think he's the same vandal from the past. See Forum:User:Anactualsmartperson and please deal with him. Yatanogarasu 04:56, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I suggest you ban him for life without comments next time that is just what he is expecting for. Us complaining about him. Kdom 05:37, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Wikia appearance images
Could you add Category:One Piece media to File:OP wikia template.png and File:OP wikia header.png? Ruxax 15:16, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Marco... Tangible?
Hey there! Don't want to bother you for nonsenses, but there something I'd like to change on Marco's page, with your approval (don't worry, it's not about super strength xD).

In the section regarding his Devil Fruit, it's said that his phoenix form, unlike Logia, is tangible, as Garp was able to punch him. In this case, I'm afraid I have to disagree: Kizaru's Yasakani no Magatama passed right trough him without damaging him, in a similar fashion to the Logia's intangibility. I think this may be attributed to the regenerative capabilities of the Fruit, which, I suppose, heals so fast that it doesn't let you ger really injuried nor feel pain. After all, Oda stated his blue fire was the source of his healing capabilities, and fire isn't certainly tangible. I think that Garp used his Haki to hit Marco, just like Whitebeard or other powerful individuals are able to hit Logia. What do you think about it? Aldarinor 19:45, August 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * So... We can see Marco's "regenerative intangibility" only when he receives devastating blows? I always thought Garp was able to hit him using Haki... Aldarinor 07:11, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mmh... You think that he blocking Akainu's attack could be attributed to the same extra-fast regenerative factor, that healed him while touching the magma and thus allowing him to put himself in the Admiral's way as a physical obstacle and as a result to "block" it? Because that would certainly be a devastating blow, seen the previous cases... Always astonished by lava "burning" fire... Something there I just don't get... It might at limit take the oxygen away from it by swallowing it, but... Burning... Fire? Really sounds wrong. Aldarinor 07:31, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, not really: I was actually referring to Marco protecting Luffy from Akainu. Aldarinor 07:53, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright then, thank you for your explananions :)
 * Since we are at it... May I wright down on his page that he possesses Super-Human Endurance? I mean, he took four laser beams from Kizaru, directly in his chest, and was still able to retain his consciousness, move and talk... Kizaru's lasers have been noted to be devastating on both Marco's page and others, as the Admiral could bring down Supernovas - level opponents with just one...
 * Well, since the page is probably going to be deleted it probably doesn't count much, however... Marco was able to retain consciousness and even run and think clearly after two lasers from Kizaru pierched his chest while he wasn't able to heal himself, and when he tried, Onigumo put Kairoseki cuffs on one of his wrists (Grrrrrrrrrrrr >.
 * We might discuss on whether he managed to heal this wounds before he came in contact with Kairoseki or not. In any case, he was pierched by two more lasers then. What am I saying is that he was able to react normally even when gravely injuried, and, of course, TO SURVIVE. A normal human would have died for that kind of injuries, two or four, doesn't matter. That's what I'm saying. Aldarinor 09:29, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Pages to delete
Please consider deletion of pages I nominated here and here. They have, imho, pretty clear reasons to be deleted. Ruxax 20:35, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Luffy's age
Can you please tell me why you deleted Luffy's age at his infobox of currently 18? I gave you a reliable source: Volume 0, Oda says: "This story is Luffy's last adventure as a 17 year old so watch it over and over again!". Yatanogarasu 03:14, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Gallery
While gallery tag's behaviour is changing every day, may be to use a template-based alternative? Please, look at Forum:Possible alternative to gallery tag. Ruxax 16:52, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Troublesome Unregistered Contributer
Please take a look at this guy. So far all of the edits he's made have been reversions of mine, and when I've tried to both explain the reason for the edit as well as talk to him on his talk page, he simply continues to revert edits without giving reason. The Pope 16:24, August 13, 2010 (UTC)