File talk:Eustass Kid Portrait.png

Edit War
Clearly this is going nowhere. So let's just discuss it here. I think the anime version is superior because of how richer the colors are, and the angle. Plus the scars are a little easier to see. Yeah, the expression isn't the best, but I think the other factors outweigh that. 22:21, October 20, 2014 (UTC)

Disagree. Conveying a character's personality properly should always take priority over color color clarity and the angle of an image, especially when the character looks constipated in the proposed. In addition to that, the manga photo has more detail, especially in the hair. --Mandon (talk) 01:44, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

The only difference in "detail" with the hair is one is a different shade of red which is not a big issue. SeaTerror (talk) 01:50, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

I don't see how the anime doesn't convey his personality. I also don't see why that should make his appearance better. 02:38, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

Maybe not, Sea, but the expression is a very big issue. The constipated look isn't how Kidd is seen throughout the manga and it in no way conveys his personality accurately. --Mandon (talk) 03:31, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

Personality in a portrait? That's just not what they're for, man. Portraits exist for easy and quick identification in galleries. Personality is not part of that.

Anyways, both options are livable, but I prefer the anime since that manga version is a bit pixelated, and Oda's art there looks kinda meh. It's sketchy and kind of rough looking. Too many rough lines that go all over and aren't straight. He's normally better than that. 03:35, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

It may not be his best but it's fine as a placeholder until a decent anime image arises. Even if you don't factor in the personality not being conveyed properly, it's still a terrible expression overall and the image suffers from it. --Mandon (talk) 07:26, October 23, 2014 (UTC)