Forum:Birkans: Unofficial Name

The name Birkans is not official, as Oda never gave it to us in anyway (unless I missed it). I think some editor just made it up based on the word "Birka". Therefore, it is unofficially named (fan term), and should be deleted. Please discuss about it. Yatanogarasu 20:38, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Discussion Starts Here
While the name is probably true (If a country ends in a vowel the citizens are usually called something-an (america->American; Skypiea->Skypiean; Morocco->Moroccan etc.) I feel that Birkans could easily be merged with Birka instead of being deleted. Angel Emfrbl created the Birkan page, so we should probably wait to hear her input though Panda 20:49, April 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * While we're on the subject, is Skypieans and Shandians official too? I think Shandians is, but I don't think I ever heard of Skypieans. If not, let's merge it, after this discussion is finalized. Yatanogarasu 21:55, April 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Skypieans and Shadians are. One-Winged Hawk 13:02, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

You are going conjectural-names-crazy. The fact that some name is unofficial is not a reason alone to merge/delete/... an article! It's only an additional reason to get rif of articles about minor, insignificant things. I don't remember about Skypieans, but to merge the two pages is not a good idea, I think: we have a separate article for each race/tribe, and it would be strange and inconsistent not to have it for Skypieans or Birkans. Ruxax 22:35, April 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it they are too short, then merge. If they are long, like Franky Schematics or one of the fake Straw Hats that haven't been named yet, then we keep. But let's hear some opinions on how to handle Birkans and Skypieans. Yatanogarasu 23:16, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

In my opinion we should treat Birkans the same way we treat Skypieans and Shandians, meaning if we decide to merge them, then we merge the three of them in a race/tribe page or if we decide to keep them separated, then all of them will have their pages regardless of the their length. Regard the name, it's not a big deal that it isn't a "official" name, if you don't like "Birkans" then change it into "Birka inhabitants", "People from Birka" or "Birka tribe". The fact is that in the One Piece world exist a tribe who come from Birka so it deserve an article like Skypieans and Shandians, the problem of naming the article is a problem on our side it's not a reason to delete it. leviathan_ 89  15:47, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with what Yatanogarasu said: if the "Birkans" article is long enough, then we might as well keep it. If, however, it's little more than a stub, it might be good to merge it with the longer page... Otherwise it might feel insignificant xD Aldarinor 19:13, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Ruxax perfectly summed up my thoughts about this. sff9 (talk) 20:27, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

I think the article should be kept as it is. It's certainly long enough to justify it standing on its own. As for whether or not they're official, you should ask Klobis of JapaneseOPfan if a translation exists anywhere. 20:33, April 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * I wish there was another name, but they all came from Bilka, there was no other name to talk about them. They are not "the same" as the Skypieans and Shandians and while it was a fan term theres absolutely nothing else to label their people as. One-Winged Hawk 13:02, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Also this image I'm posting here represents the 3 races of the sky we saw in the skypiea arc. What we're missing is a huge chunk of the Skypiean, Shandian and Bilka history that ties the 3 races together. But, I do note we have the Void Century involved which may explain why, since we also know at least the shandians were involved with that. One-Winged Hawk 13:05, April 15, 2011 (UTC)