Forum:Twenty Kingdoms

Well now, should we give Twenty Kingdoms it's own page now that we have 2 kingdoms.

Joekido (talk) 18:19, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Discussion
Wat SeaTerror (talk) 18:20, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

No need, they can be mentioned in the World Government article. Maybe if we had all twenty, that'd be better, but we don't. 18:22, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Even if we had all 20 they would only go on the World Government article. SeaTerror (talk) 18:23, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Isn't Ancient Kingdom supposed to include that info? 18:25, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

The Twenty Kingdoms are kingdoms that fought against the Ancient Kingdom, so to include the Ancient Kingdom in the list, you are saying the Ancient Kingdom fought itself? Anyway I wrote a draft in the World Government page

Joekido (talk) 19:00, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Then I think we could make that page. 19:02, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Ancient Kingdom is a bad place for it. Just leave it on the WG page and close the discussion. 19:39, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Why not make a page for it? It doesn't hurt anything. 19:40, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Because there's not enough content to fill a page. And all the information that would be on that page also needs to be on World Government as well. Rather than having the same stuff on two pages, we might as well just keep it on one. This is why the redirect Twenty Kingdoms exists. 04:35, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

I agree. All I can see this page having is the same information that's already on a bunch of other pages and we don't need to do that. Besides that, we'd have very little to go on. I'd only say to make this page once we found out what the other 18 kingdoms are. 04:46, September 26, 2013 (UTC)