Talk:Riku

King Riku
The page "Riku" should talk about king Riku from 800 years ago. He is a named character, there is no reason to not have an article about him.

This is a great idea Levi. I've been meaning to create a page for him in order to add him in the Riku Family template. He was too important of a character, history-wise, to be left without an article.

Yeah, go ahead and do it. 22:06, November 13, 2013 (UTC)

We only have his surname. I don't think an article is necessary. 15:02, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

We also have history, repationships and personality material.

"We have only his surname" - for many characters we had only a nickname and we still created the page (i.e. Big Mom).

The kings in the last 800 years are all King Riku. --Klobis (talk) 23:26, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

^This. Both the king 800 years ago and Riku Dold III have been referred to as "King Riku", so King Riku is closer to an occupation then a name. All the information we have on the guy can easily fit into the Riku Family article, same as how the God of Skypiea 400 years ago just has a paragraph in the Skypiea article. We'd be better off doing this, and leaving Riku as a disambiguation page for all the Riku-related articles we have/will have if/when Rebecca/Viola/Scarlett are formally introduced as "Riku X". Same goes for "Donquixote". 02:56, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

Let's go with a disambiguation page where we link to Riku Dold III, the family, and the first king (wherever we talk about him).

I agree with Zodiaque. 13:46, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

So the disambiguation page is fine?