User talk:ScipioLecter

Crocodile's relationships
First of all, Crocodile and Hancock ignoring each other doesn't make a relationship. Second, Crocodile having a brief clash with Mihawk to defend Daz Bones doesn't make a relationship. Finally, Crocodile having a brief conversation with Teach at Impel Down doesn't make a relationship either.Fliu (talk) 12:29, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

They were still peers in the same group at one time, meaning that even a lack of interaction is a point of note. If they weren't all Shichibukai at one point then you'd have a ponit, but given they were all part of the same organization, even no interactions is somting to note, you also didn't talk about it with anyone one as far as I can see, you just used what your own opinion as judgment. ScipioLecter (talk) 17:44, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Here is from the relationship guidelines. You can find it by clicking on "Help" on the top of the page. Then click guidelines, then go to Manual of Style, then click on General Article Policies. Fliu (talk) 19:03, May 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * The relationship section should be limited to any sort of relationship between the character of the article in question, and the opposite character. Actions do not belong in the relationships section.
 * Relationships sections should be about what characters think of each other and not simply a recap of something that happened between the two. For example, saying "Luffy hates Blackbeard for capturing Ace, and so attacked him when the two met in Impel Down" is good, while "Luffy and Blackbeard once fought in Impel Down" is not.

Lack of response is still viable in these situation, becasue they were all in the same group, indifference is a part of reltionships as much as hating ot liking someone. Crocodile inderffernce to Hancock is notable becasue they were peers yet he didn't responded to her, or react to her beuty like every other prisonero ther than Jinbei and Ace. His interaction whith Teach as fits more in line with the "good example" than the bad one.