Talk:Vinsmoke Family

Infobox Image
Should I add Sanji as the info-box image? Something better than nothing. 22:30, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

We can use Sanji for now & make a proper infobox later when they're introduced. We could use Sanji's father, since he seems to be the patriarch. It's also possible that they have an insignia, as these sorts of families sometimes do.
 * 海賊☠姫 (talk) 22:45, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, that'd be good. We can also put Big Mom in the Charlotte Family infobox. 02:10, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

043
Okay, I wanna bring this up here. How is this NOT an Easter Egg? Rei(0)ju and Yon(4)ji's names, combined with San(3)ji's name, all make up the number of Sanji's first appearance. Oda could have used ANY other number, like Eichiju or Niji. But instead, he introduced the Vinsmoke Family with numbers that correspond to that specific chapter. No "rhyme or reason" for the numbers? I don't think that it's just a coincidence that Oda would choose these SPECIFIC numbers to introduce the family in. Oda very often has Easter Eggs in One Piece, and this is just one in the form of a chapter title corresponding to the family. Specifically, the way the family was introduced. 08:14, May 21, 2016 (UTC)

100% agree. He chooses any two numbers and they just happen to complement San-ji to make his appearance chapter? Oda doesn't do accidents like that.

10:32, May 21, 2016 (UTC)

It's just as silly as the "Gear Fourth was introduced in Chapter 783 which is the chapter where Gear Second was introduced backwards (387). There are just so many ways to manipulate numbers that any sort of chapter number trivia is banal. The only evidence of Oda structuring his story around a chapter number is chapter 100, where he rushed Loguetown so they would enter the Grand Line in it. "Oda could have used ANY other number, like Eichiju (sic) or Niji" - obviously they have a different role in the story and need to be introduced later, like how Mr. 1 and Mr.2 were introduced long after Mr. 8, Mr. 9 and Mr.0. 104.238.45.96 12:03, May 21, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, what the AWC said. This is just reaching, the "0" doesn't even factor in at all. 12:16, May 21, 2016 (UTC)