Forum:5th Headings

Discussion
Yesterday on Chat DP mentioned something about changing 5th headings to 4th headings because %th headings are smaller then regular text. Should we be changing them appropriately. I'm a bit confused. 22:04, January 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * The solution is to remove the "history" section title in each history page. They are useless now, since the whole pages are histories. They add an unnecessary heading level.


 * Sounds plausible but should we do it yet? 22:26, January 28, 2012 (UTC)

What are you talking about?

Why not? It should have been done a long time ago anyway, as soon as the articles were tabbed. Fliu and I did it. (BTW these pages are waaay too detailed. But whatever, I'm not gonna fight about this.)

What's wrong with the 'History' section/heading and we should remove it?

Just to be clear, I'm not arguing against headings in general, just 5th headings. They can't be edited and are hardly noticeable to be of any good. Most of the headings on history pages are size 3, so everything should be able to fit under them pretty well. We don't need sub-sub-subsections with 5th headings. If we use them we might as well use normal text to show breaks in the story. I want the smallest heading to be heading 4. 06:33, January 29, 2012 (UTC)