File talk:Hina Portrait.png

Edit War
The manga image is more detailed. 10:12, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

I agree. --Klobis (talk) 10:36, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

Great. 10:41, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

Klobis always agrees when it comes to manga. SeaTerror (talk) 17:30, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

The anime looks nicer. Why are we using old stuff when the new clearly has sharper quality to it? Genocyber (talk) 05:11, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Genocyber, the anime does look better overall. I'll search the manga again to see if there are any important differences with the anime. If not, I'll try to find a better anime version with more focus on frontal display and no sunglasses covering her eyes. MasterDeva (talk) 09:05, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Newer Version Dispute
I find that the manga version is of lower quality to the most recent anime version. They are essentially the same pose, although the manga version has a downward angle. My biggest problem though is that the scan quality of the manga is quite low, as you can see obvious gridlines from the paper it is scanned from, it's pixelated, and quite small. The most recent anime version is of substantially higher quality and has equal artistic detail. 17:37, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

We should attempt to look for a better scan of the calendar. I'm sure it exists somewhere. Anyways, as for detail, Hina's nose in the anime version is not as detailed as the manga version. 17:44, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

The anime is more frontal, HQ and she doesn't have her arms open so we should use that version. 19:43, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Manga seems "frontal" to me. Arms aren't distracting from the overall purpose, so that's not an issue. The only issue is the slight quality loss, but I'm sure a better scan exists somewhere. 19:55, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Then find that version Gal, otherwise my support is firmly with the anime. 20:29, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

The anime pic is more frontal than the manga pic. Even if you get a HQ version of the manga, I still support the anime. 20:31, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Same amount of frontalness actually. Compare them and check it out! You're not addressing the detail of her nose either, so please do that, in 100 words or more please (Staw).

I'll look for the thing also. 20:38, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

I personally found this image to be good enough. It has enough detail, the perfect position (not too close, not too far), and there is no griddy-look. I'm sure if we could find an HD version of it, the color could be untinted and it would be clearer. 23:06, September 18, 2013 (UTC)