User talk:Adv193

One Piece Fanon News
At One Piece Fanon we got a Tournament if you enter and win firts place you will become a Bureaucrat and a Administrator! I hope you enter it's a Tournament about the most creative Location! And Welcome to One Piece Encyclopedia!

Young Piece 17:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

re:Manga and Anime Difference Guide deletion
My "plans" on deleting the page so far is just a suggestion. I want to hear some opinion on whether or not to delete that page, since we don't seem to be updating it that much anyways. 07:46, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

re:Deletion
Just deleted them. I didn't check the deletion today until just now, so I didn't notice. Thanks for the notice. 02:44, August 17, 2013 (UTC)

re:Comixology
Go for it, if it is like VIZ Media (official manga distributor), it gets a page of its own. But at least make sure you have enough info before creating the page, not just one to two sentences. 16:57, July 5, 2014 (UTC)

re:Omnibi
Yeah, I can see the situation calling for it. It shouldn't be their own page, but rather a subpage of the Chapters and Volumes page with the same layout. 06:17, November 26, 2014 (UTC)

Vol 4
Thank you. 02:12, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Reference List issue
I just checked the Post-War Arc article. The issue is that someone didn't do the references correctly. The references all come from the Story Impact section, and they all look like this-  . References should look like this-  . Since someone didn't name the references correctly, none of the text are showing up properly in the reference list. 20:52, April 9, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Vandalism
If you see someone doing frequent vandalism, put on their talkpage. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 13:44, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, works for me as part of the edits I've done over the years includes reverting vandalism. Didn't know about it until now.-Adv193 (talk) 13:47, April 11, 2016 (UTC)

Make sure it's actually a lot since people should not be banned if it's 1-3 separate edits. That's why we have the vandalism template instead. SeaTerror (talk) 16:30, April 11, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Draft Page
Sure, although you and anyone else are free to edit the page. Hopefully it can be moved to the mainspace soon, maybe tomorrow. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 22:17, April 20, 2016 (UTC)

re:Image Problem
That image simply does not exist yet. So if you can find one and upload it, that would be great. 07:30, May 19, 2016 (UTC)

Re:burning blood
I banned the IP, as well as another that popped up this morning. I've also put a 3 day IP lock on the page. Let me know if excessive vandalism continues. 14:26, May 31, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Chapter 846
Done. 18:57, November 21, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Question
I'm not sure, but my guess is that when either the vandal or the editor moved the page, I think they moved the new page's history over the old one, removing the history logs. I'm trying to find a way to undo it, but I think only admins can do it. 22:19, March 4, 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry you had to help out with it. Vandals usually get dealt with swiftly, but obviously all of the content mods and admins are offline, and I've been trying to contact them, but yeah.... Anyway, hopefully someone will come online soon, or I'll contact the VSTF. 22:33, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

I've restored the original and it seems clean thanks to you, Fliu and Jade. Sorry it took a while. 22:59, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Chapter 859
Thank you for pointing it out, however truth be told, it wasn't a prediction but a misunderstanding. I thought the "ename" meant the english name on the chapter release, not the literal english translation of the given japanese title. Anyway, due to the fact that I'm unable to purchase any official translation, and rely on others sources (even for the raw title I just hand write on google translate and copy the characters for the "jname" and "rname"), I believe that in the future it to be best if I just leave the "ename" for those who can, and apologize in advance for the trouble of finishing my work. Rhavkin (talk) 15:28, March 20, 2017 (UTC)

Story Impacts
I overhauled the WCI story impact section - whaddaya think? Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 18:59, June 7, 2017 (UTC)

The Zou Arc impact has been shortened greatly, though I hope I didn't leave anything out. I'll look into Dressrosa later, though I went over it earlier today and most of it was pretty good. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 03:15, June 8, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Need Help
It's dealt with. 20:49, June 12, 2017 (UTC)

Eyup. Keep an eye out for any socks 21:13, June 12, 2017 (UTC)

PS: Sock = duplicate account by same person 21:16, June 12, 2017 (UTC)

RE warring
Alright understood next time I will leave it alone, and let an admin take care of it.4orty5ive (talk) 22:37, June 12, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Community Corner
Wooooops. Thank you 14:15, June 16, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Opinion
I guess a temporary protection would be best.Fliu (talk) 21:43, September 4, 2017 (UTC)

Category
What was going on that Personality and Relationships page involved the issue with the relationship tree and I have still not heard back from AuroraOfDeath or Rhavkin so bear with me.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 18:05, September 6, 2017 (UTC)

RE:
Look Adv193 if I knew how to do that I would but anyway have you checked those messages I've left on the forums and talk pages you've been messaging.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 00:17, December 29, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Dressrosa Story Impact
Oh yeah, I just forgot about those. Added them along with Usopp. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 14:06, May 9, 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah shit, I was in a rush and completely overlooked that. Added now. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 17:04, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

Edit War Tips
Some things to keep in mind for edit wars:
 * When both of you keep undoing the other's edit, you should start a discussion on the article talk page.
 * The page goes back to the version it was on before the disputed edit was made. In the Brook page's case, it was the one with the full trivia, in the Sanji page's case, it was the one without the addition to the "Mellorine" point. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 05:06, April 8, 2020 (UTC)

Past tense for history section
Please use past tense when updating the history section.Fliu (talk) 16:58, August 23, 2020 (UTC)

Re:Chapter 992
Both Mangaplus and Viz list a delayed date, although they disagree on the exact date. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 02:20, September 30, 2020 (UTC)

Edits
How are my edits speculations? I was stating the obvious, and I did say that the connection between Whitebeard and Dragon was unofficially confirmed. Frontierchris 16:46, July 4, 2021 (UTC)

The first paragraph in this image. the dates for the translations might be ambiguous, but the WhichMangaDate shows the Japanese release in WSJ, whose dates are known. Rhavkin (talk) 04:04, September 30, 2020 (UTC)

Chapter articles
I clarified the spoiler rules recently after discussing it with other editors. From now on, wait for official release date confirmation before making the chapter article. This was the original intent of the rules rather than making the pages based on spoilers saying "break" or "no break". 06:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

No worries, I was just explaining in case you were wondering about the change. It's not that I doubt the release information either, this is just about keeping things straightforward (one unreleased chapter article at a time). 07:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Re:Protection Request
That limit is already known from SBS 93 and Chapter 997, so I don't think it'll be an issue. 19:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Re:Zoro
The protection is lifted. 21:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Re:Need a Small Favor
Manga Plus lists it normally. March 7 following Japan's timezone. 15:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Re:Protection Request
The page is already semi-protected. I won't change the protection level unless an edit war starts. 16:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Re:Image Request
An image of that exists on the Z's Ambition Arc article. 19:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Luffy's Dream
That's not an impact to the story, because I think that's the dream, they kept censoring in the flashbacks. DragonEmeperor (talk) 01:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Re:Spoiler Crackdown Alert
It's made clear in the chapter that Luffy's approval is required, so I think the protection can be lifted for now. We'll see if any issues arise. 15:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Re:Question
Stick to one unreleased chapter article at a a time. 16:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you very much and I apologize profusely for the mistake. In the late night I mistook one for the other, I'll take care not to make the same mistake again.Blackdagger01 (talk) 06:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Re: Baratie Arc
Hi! I didn't wanna go back and forth with the edits on the page, but I did see you add another reference for episode 29. Wouldn't it make sense to just lump the reference's episodes instead of having two for that chapter? What do you think? :)


 * Okay, noted. Thanks for the clarification! -Choppaw (talk) 23:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! I must have missed it. I think I was too focused on the Fish-Man Island flashback part. I use the free MangaPlus app but it doesn't really give me the confidence to reference the pages since the Wiki sometimes says there are 21 pages, but the MangaPlus version shows 24 or vice versa. I also can't re-view once I finish with a chapter so for second readings, I crosscheck and use... "free to read" sites which use the official translations.

-Choppaw (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Egghead Arc
What about Luffy's dream then because that's connected to his goal of becoming Pirate King. DragonEmeperor (talk) 03:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

We do have some info for an Artificial Devil Fruit section but got moved to the Punk Hazard Arc. DragonEmeperor (talk) 22:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Spoiler Rules
My bad. Sorry I went on a little holiday right after I edited that. But noted on the spoiler rules. Thanks for the heads up!

-Choppaw (talk) 09:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Devil Fruit Users
I am not adding information based on speculation, this is listed on both Chapter 1064 and the Blackbeard Pirates pages, and was confirmed in the manga by Blackbeard himself. We listed character because they appeared in supplementary materials (Reiju in One Piece Magazine, Tamago's fruit class by a youtube video...) as oppose to those two and S-Hawk being confirmed in the manga, and listed Sanjuan Wolf despite not seeing his ability used.

For a reference, we list the Jailer Beasts as DF users based on Crocodile comment, despite now being aware of the existence of Minks (I am NOT speculating they are mink. This is just to make a point). A credible character mentioning someone is a DF user has always been acceptable.

And going to an admin before talking it out in our talk page is childish and counter productive. Rhavkin (talk) 05:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)