Talk:Bounties

Fake Bounties
Seriously, the fakes bounties on Shanks, Roger, Ace and Dragon suck. No matter how hard you try they don't die! One-Winged Hawk 23:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't think bounty on Das Bones is true. I try to look around Baroque Works mini-series Ch. 359–413 but got nothing. if it is real, please somebody focus the position or chapter refer to the bounty because I think this is fake bounty.JGV 14:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Confirmed. Its not in the mini-series (never checked out the Baroque Works one, its dull).  Not in the anime... Ep. 130 brings up nothing. Chances are; not in the manga also.  One-Winged Hawk 18:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I think it's likely that at least those of the Baroque agents who were not captured iimediately in Arabasta (Mr.3, Miss Goldenweek, Mr. 5 and Miss Valentine) must have bounties since they were wanted by the Marines, we just don't know how high they are. I thin we should mention them in the "Bounties not yet determined" section. El Chupacabra 14:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Poster
I need some people to help me to find the wanted poster of anyone here.
 * On who? One-Winged Hawk 12:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

anyone

Overhaul
Trying to inprove the page a little. Okay a tables been added, and later today I will finish off the page (going out for a few hours). Hope everyone likes it.

The Straw Hats were orginally in order of bounty, I've put them in order of membership. Its easier to deal with them in this order then highest bounty. Anyway, it isn't important really. One-Winged Hawk 08:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Done... Now thats much better! :-D One-Winged Hawk 10:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Straw Hats and East Blue
Dont Luffy, Zoro, Nami, Usopp and Sanji come from East Blue? They should be included in the East Blue Table. An example would be Jewelry Bonny, she is currently in the grand line but her section is still in the west blue section. Oathkeeper of oblivion 04:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Because its the best way of handling the main characters. Basically its "Main characters" then "everyone else".  All the templates are set up this too (pirate crews and ships for example).  The only time we don't do this is like on the Devil Fruits template and Supernova template, because it wouldn't work if they were seperated from the pack on those particulaur ones.  --One-Winged Hawk 08:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Well shouldnt the Straw Hat's bounties count for something? I mean if you did count them for East Blue, then it wouldn't be the weakest sea.


 * Its the storyline that states the sea is the weakest. Even with Luffy + the Straw Hats bounties, that doesn't ness. mean that the East Blue has gained any strength.  For example, the West Blue is where Shanks is from, Shanks is a Yonkou.  The SHs are no where near Yonkou level, so therefore the East blue is no where near the level of strength by your logic of the West Blue  (ind you, both Gold Roger and Shanks are listed as Grand Line pirates and not from their listed seas... Never mind, I'll sort that out some point).  :-/  --One-Winged Hawk 21:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh i get it..it all makes sense except for the part where it says " the average is 3,000,000 B therefore it is the weakest sea." It shouldn't really matter what the average is, if its stated in the storyline. Oathkeeper of oblivion 21:54, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It is mentioned in the storyline, when Luffy is given his bounty Brandnew mentions it. It is out of date, but has never been updated by the storyline.  --One-Winged Hawk 21:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Seriously
Okay, its FINE rewording text, but can we NOT removing a chunk of heavy referenced stuff and put in stuff that isn't referenced at all. I have to revert in this case because its not on. If you want to correct text you've GOT to replace the text you put in with equally referenced text. This is the core of this wikia is providing information, but we can't call anything legit unless we give the sources from where the text come from. The idea is someone else can check it out and make sure its correct.

In other words if you want to rewrtie the bounty issuing bit - get those references in or it will just be reverted! I should never have to tell anyone off for this EVER! --One-Winged Hawk 22:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I know this sounds a bit dramatic, but if anyone does the above again (since I just found something else that needed to be on the page that got removed and it was sourced), for the following week its going on "no source = instant revert". --One-Winged Hawk 23:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Ideas?
Okay, I know I finished this template and all and it looks nice...

but take a looksie here

I'm thinking... Would anyone like me to drop this template again and write this kind of template onto the page? For anyone who hasn't guessed whats the difference, its that by clicking any of the factors on the header of the template you can re-organise it. Some bad sides... I'll hjave to drop all the individual templates and combine them but it should make for an effective template. The info stuff would be left off though, the other downside is that, so we'd have the amounts, references and all but not actually written why they recieved a bounty.

I could actually include it... But it would make the table much too long. I'll leave this in discussion and if anyone likes the idea I'll do a mock-up table. One-Winged Hawk 08:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not exactly sure how it's gonna be made but I would like to see what can accomplished.Mugiwara Franky 17:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Not sure myself, never worked with these type of tables before. But I'm dying to TRY one. :-D  One-Winged Hawk 18:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

"Possible bounties"
I have seen before that there was a session listing "possible bounties" instead of leaving them alongside the others as ???,???,???. I believe that is a better idea, because it takes too confusing to separate confimed bounties to especulative.

Ilovefoxes 05:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * "???,???,???"s are really full blown speculations and shouldn't even be on the table. I included them simply because they were already there.  Otherwise, due to our own speculation rules... "Bye-bye ???,???,???s!", take this in mind, its either this or none of them included at all.  One-Winged Hawk 07:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I am in total disagree in leaving this page with speculation and unknow values bounties one alongside other.


 * I believe that some few lines can explain that there are possible bounties. And there is no need to constant repeat that a Yonkou/Shichibukai may have a bounty...


 * Ilovefoxes 06:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * No disagreements on their removal... To be honest, I'm ashamed because I've had a soft spot for the bounties page because of the slaughtering that happened to it on wikipedia.  Its the page I admit I tend to be a little less enforcing on the rulesbecause of it (except when there is a plain all out rumour put on there). One-Winged Hawk 07:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Meaningless Coding

 * -style="background: #F2F2F2;"

This is a rogue line of codig that does nothing. Its been completely removed from the table. Going over he revisions, its slipped in when I was orginally editing and ceating a table and I did not mean or it t be there. o get it to work, the intended colour nees a word not a code, for some reason. ts not in all the entries bcause I ever intended it to be there, as I've stated - it does nothing, least on my browser. I don't know about anyone else.

I can't spot n the revisions when it sliped in but I think I am aware of how it did. I was double checking some codng on wikipedia on thir help guide, it was suppose to do what I wanted but didn't. Looks like I missed it in places during the transfer of coding from my test page to here. I apologise for the confusion, however if I remove coding like this from a table, its for a reason and I'd prefer it if that person would come and tell me why rather ten wasting time by readding the mess. One-Winged Hawk 10:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * On my server, the code makes a line of cells of the table turn light gray. Removing them turns them white.Mugiwara Franky 10:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * To get it to work for me I've got to write something like "Silver" in place of "F2F2F2". One-Winged Hawk 10:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * It works for other people, but because it doesn't work for you, you remove it? Stop being so selfish. 71.161.226.43 15:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Please don't make me repeat myself, but since you misunderstood I have to regardless:


 * I never intended for that line of coding to be there, so enough already. It was a mistake.  An Error.  A slip-up.  If you look back at my edits on the history page, everything that I added after it was introduced to the page did not include that line of coding.  Only the transferred bits from my test page.  If I remove an unintended coding, am I really being selfish considering I wrote the thing?  Because that code doesn't work, I never spot it in all the edits that have been done this, thats why it wan't removed sooner.


 * I'm actaully working on another Bounties table, but its WIP since I have no idea if it will turn out better in the long run. One-Winged Hawk 00:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * So having the gray highlights is a bad thing just because it wasn't your original intention? 72.82.1.5 02:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Besides, this is a wiki, so suggesting that no one should add anything to code you originally made is ridiculous. The whole point of wikis is that other people can change things. 72.82.1.5 03:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Unneeded Coding. I tend to avoid coding since I would probably screw up. I'll remove your edits if you try to do it again Supreme Lordship IP Address. Drunk Samurai 19:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, you mean like how you reverted the color changes to Sweet Pea twice without explaining yourself, and then had the admin undo your reverts? Sorry, but with that you proved you revert things for no reason, so you saying you'll revert any changes I make doesn't mean jack. 72.82.1.5 03:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Please do not fight with other people random IP as it is rude. The issue is currently being discussed and a solution is being thought up. It is unwise to add flame to an otherwise friendly discussion.Mugiwara Franky 03:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

From what can be assessed from this discussion so far, Angel made a table for the bounty page with everything including the highlights. The whole structure of the code was not changed since the beginning except for some additional bounties from others. As she was looking at the code, she discovered something in her coding that doesn't seem to show up in her server. Because nothing showed up, she thought it was useless. However as she was removing it, she asked others if anything showed on their monitors with the code. Others have responded to her accordingly. Some politely, some rudely. Her actions were made with good intention.Mugiwara Franky 04:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

I'll tell you the reason why I removed the coding shall I? BECAUSE I can't see it so if I need to EDIT the table at any point I can't TELL IF THE NEW CODINGS HAVING ANY EFFECT ON THE OLD !!!

I'm annoyed at the reaction I'm having. This is stupid MF, people shouldn't be fighting if coding that wasn't intended gets removed. As I've stated, I can't see it! But if the person who is readding had used their head I said I CAN see if its a word like "Silver" in place of the colour code!

Regardless, its not going on there. If people don't mind me getting a little bit tempermental, but you must understand this is being blown out of preportions and I don't want this. Lets put it this way; I'm happy doing coding for a wikia, I'm happy editing coding to make adjustments, but I'm not happy about an argument over nothing. Is the coding important to the table? NO! It wasn't intended so got removed. Is it ness. to argue over it? NO again! But the reason remains - what good to a coder is something they can' even see? As stated if I have to make adjustments to that table at any point and that code is messing it up/playing me about I won't be able to fix it. I'd rather not be put in that in that shoe thank you nor would I want others. If I can't see it, there will be others who also won't be able to see it. One-Winged Hawk 17:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * A few hours to cool down. Okay, as stated I'm not against adjustments, but its got to be fair so:


 * -style="background: Silver;"


 * Instead of:


 * -style="background: #F2F2F2;"


 * Or another grey colour instead of Silver please if you must readd it. I can see one form of coding but not the other.  And please, no more arguments, its not worth it over something small.  What would have been better would have been if the person arguing had took into consideration that I was having problems with that code (not the first time something like this has happened with the wiki coding).  Sometimes the wiki coding will work for me on one wiki system (AKA Wikipedia) and not for another (AKA this wiki network).


 * Why didn't I just do this alteration myself? As stated, I just never intended the coding in there.  To me, I was fixing a bug.  To someone else it was making the table look better.  It wasn't just others who have added new input into that table, I myself did too and all edits since the orginal table didn't have the mistake coding in.  Thats why som had the highlight and others didn't - I never intended the highlights, others pretty much copied me.


 * I was going for a simulair look with Timeline, but in Timelines case the needed was hard to read and I had to put in that coding in for everyone's sakes. Thats a long table with a lot of text; in comparison this is quite small.  Thats why timeline has highlights and this one doesn't, or not intentionally meant to.  In this pages case, that table is truthfully just seperating the info, and making it neater for easier reading and not trying to handle huge amounts of info and make it look good.


 * But there you go... You can pretty much ignore that last paragraph, thats designers waffle and isn't really needed for this discussing (don't hurt me much for wasting 30 seconds of your life please :-P ). One-Winged Hawk 18:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)