User talk:Dragonus Nesha

Birthday Calendar
Stop it deleting links to birthday calendar already. They are important. Babaev (talk) 20:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Then why was created birthday calendar in SBS Volume 79? Babaev (talk) 20:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

I want to know. Why characters can't share their birthdays with each other? Babaev (talk) 20:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Seriously? Сharacters can share their birthdays if they have something in common? Babaev (talk) 20:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

I want to talk about Zoro and Vivi's birthdays. Babaev (talk) 20:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Answer me already. I want to talk about Zoro and Vivi's birthdays. Babaev (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

I know they have different birthdays so they don't share. I want to talk about source of their birthdays. Maybe their birthdays comes from their names? Babaev (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

I want to talk about this. Babaev (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

I think I know where Zoro's birthday comes from. Babaev (talk) 20:50, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

I don't know how to solve the problem about Zoro and Vivi's birthdays. Babaev (talk) 00:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Can you reply already on my talk page when I write to you? Babaev (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

I would like to talk about Vivi's birthdays. It seems to me that her birthday, February 2, comes from her name since 2-2 can be derived from Vi-vi. Babaev (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

What do you think about this? Babaev (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

İ have read your response. And you're right, I really don't speak Japanese. I just need someone's help in solving this problem. Babaev (talk) 23:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Maybe you can help me with this? Babaev (talk) 23:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Then who should I contact to solve this problem? Babaev (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Trivia
Why "Playing gambling" is improper writing? Babaev (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Alright. Now answer on my question. Babaev (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Just like you repeatedly refused to listen to me. Babaev (talk) 22:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Re: Issue in Qref
The facts that the issue in chapter page is listed in the chapter box, just like the volume, the individual chapters are listed in the same page as those already in volume, and that both the magazine and the volume are the only official media for the information to be found, makes them on equal status and thus both should be included in the reference equally. If someone want to go to the official source of the chapter, where would they look if the chapter hasn't been released in a volume? The magazine.

Yes, this wiki uses the official English release in the manga plus site, but we list the chapter's volume when it is released in Japan, so until a chapter is released in a volume the the only way for most readers to look up that information is either the manga plus site, or the magazine.

The issues are listed with year and issue and they usually have the same year of the chapter date with the exceptions of the last few each year, so when we include the issue it will always be in the same format you call long, so instead of arguing on whether it is necessary, as it is curranty important enough to be listed in the chapter page, chapters and volumes page, and are the only other official source, just like the volumes, maybe TRY and work WITH other people to fix your problem with the "long" format.

If a section or an entry is to long, you wouldn't remove it, you would keep on editing it wouldn't you? So what's the difference?? Rhavkin (talk) 18:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your reasoning is again just that something is "too long" which again, isn't a reason to not include things. The code is massive because of the detailed lists whenever there isn't a that'll have the conditional expressions, and the rest in a separate Qref labeled "Eref" or have something like {{Qref|E|... for examples for everything else

Currently I can't fix the multiple issues missing the Chapter2\Cover2 issue so I'll try to talk to an admin or CM. Please do not take it as going over your head. This discussion on necessity, format, and general template improvements does not affect the fact that the template must work properly. Rhavkin (talk) 03:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Images
Impossible to change jpg images to png images? Babaev (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Luffy's Kenbunshoku Haki
thumb On Luffy's Abilities and Powers, shouldn't his future vision gif be replaced with this gif that shows that Luffy has now mastered Future Vision to where he can now see a clear transition of the future to actively change it instead of just showing the awakened aura version?

Images
What's wrong with that I added here? It illustrates the technique better and more focused. I can't overwrite the previous manga image because there are pages that use it. Kin201 (talk) 14:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Nika Nika Model Leopard
Why you've undo my change on Neko Neko no Mi, Model: Leopard ? I'll prefer a clear answer :D Thx!

Reply to my talk page: Yeah, it make Lot of sense, now I can improve my edits! (I appreciated the clear answer) JiunoLujo [Founder] 16:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Image Guidelines
I would love some advice on how to properly add images, could you help in any way?

MADS infobox
So no offense but I highly disagree that the Manga Infobox for MADS should be their ship. It is clear that the page is about the scientists and for every other group, we use the Members as the infobox. Also it is weird if people look up the page and see that a ship is supposed to be MADS. And then we have the members as a past picture instead of the main infobox. Can you tell me why ship over members? Vision34 (talk)Vision34Vision34 (talk)

SBS 76
What about Penguin and Shachi? They have animal resemblances, like Law? Babaev (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

So you want to tell me that only Law have animal resemblances? Babaev (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

What I majorly misinterpreted? Babaev (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

I ask again. What I majorly misinterpreted? Babaev (talk) 20:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Can you answer me already? What I majorly misinterpreted? Babaev (talk) 21:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

What you did? I don't understand. You wrote to me that I majorly misinterpreted what the animal references mean. What I majorly misinterpreted? Babaev (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Close up
I don't know what details can be seen on the infobox images. Babaev (talk) 21:54 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Director Categories
Hello. Thank you for telling me about the director categories. I find that fact very interesting. I'm not sure what else to say about it, but thank you for telling me. It's really interesting. ZJ2001 (talk), 1:54pm, January 7, 2023

Character Histories
I don't know in what tense and in what style to write. I tried to explain to you what it's like to be in Bonney's story, but you didn't listen to me. If you know in what tense and in what style it is better to write, you could change it a little. But instead, you just deleted it. Please stop deleting what need. Babaev (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

I won't waste time reading the wiki's Manual of Style because you don't care what I'm trying to explain to you. If you don't listen to me, then I won't listen to you too. What I wrote should be in Bonney's story, period. Babaev (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

If you how to write correctly, then could have corrected it a litle, but instead you just deleted it. Babaev (talk) 00:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't know to properly correct the additions. Babaev (talk) 19:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

I insist on edit-warring because you don't care and you don't want to help me. Both Adv193 and you have don't tried to tell me what corrections I need to make and how to do them. You don't show me example. Babaev (talk) 20:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Then I'll ask Adv193 for help. But even if I write to him, I'm afraid that he won't answer me and won't help me. Babaev (talk) 21:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't know which wiki I should practice writing summaries that I'm more comfortable with. I do not have that. And I don't know what summaries you're writing about? I can't do everything myself. Babaev (talk) 17:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Again, deleting important for a page is a sloppy job and ruins the articles too. If know how to edit correctly, then do this already.Babaev (talk) 08:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

New pages
I would like your opinion about creating some pages about some Kuri towns, since as I have noticed they can be very useful as well. Because no, literally the Ryugu Kingdom has the same way, even for a simple store or factory

Spoiler Rules
Stop spoiling the characters' stories already. Not only did you ruin Bonney's story during the Egghead Arc, but now you're ruining Vivi's story. If you know how to edit properly, then do something already instead of deleting it. By removing the necessary, you spoil characters' stories. Babaev (talk) 19:50 7 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't want to take some time to read the rules that you linked. For me it's waste of time. And I repeat in last time, if you know how to edit properly, then do something already instead of deleting it. Babaev (talk) 20:18 7 February 2023 (UTC)

About Black Maria's Haki Section
Why did you revert the changes I made to Black Maria's haki section back to the way they were before? She actually did use Busoshoku Haki on her brass knuckles during the fight with Robin, it's shown in both the manga and anime. In the anime, the Haki sound effect when she uses it confirms it even further.

But she clearly did imbue her brass knuckles with busoshoku haki in the manga and the anime supports it, this isn't them just adding haki where it didn't happen in the manga like Zoro using Conqueror's Haki during the Raid long before Kaido was supposed to revealed to him that he had it. If you would go look at the panel in Ch. 1021 while she's putting on her brass knuckles and saying "I'm a fighter, you know. And I show no mercy to anyone..." she's coating her brass knuckles in haki. They're even blacker and shinier than they were when she wore them to torture Sanji right before Robin and Brooke rescued him, you also see bits of black sparks of electricity in her right palm because she's using haki.

Also, if Black Maria using haki in the anime doesn't count, then why does Sabo using kenbunshoku in the anime does? He doesn't have any kenbunshoku feats in the manga. 16:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

I still disagree but I'll wait until the Colored Comics version of Chapter 1021 to come out before I bring this up again. Hopefully a clearer image of Black Maria coating her brass knuckles with haki in the manga. But until then, if I mentioned it's the anime's representation, could I include it in Black Maria's haki section that she used Busoshoku in the fight with Robin?

Re:Red Hair Pirates Officers
Still you can not deny they, like the Straw Hats, are officers and recognized as such on both the page and template. Rgilbert27 (talk) 15:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Move the discussion here. Rgilbert27 (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Swordsmanship style
Excuse me for a question about the attacks of Nekomamushi and Inuarashi, Oden Ittoryu: Neko Niko Ban and Oden Ittoryu: Inu Spire, because they are exactly Oden's Two Sword Style, if they only use one sword to perform it. It would not be better to create another page like One Sword Style of the Flower, since they are different

Black Maria Haki
What? Black Maria definitely used haki in the anime, it's confirmed by the armament haki sound effect and the red haki aura that appears around her fist when she first does Oiran Knuckles. Then she clearly uses haki again in conjunction with her poison when she tries to go for an Oiran Knuckles against Demon Robin. And as for your comment about the colored comics, we'll see when the chapter comes out.

Blue Deep
Yes I've acknowledged, Blue Deep databook does indeed contain the information on Luffy's height and age after timeskip. But still, just like I said, one reference is not enough. Moreover, information from the SBS is easier to find than from the databook and other sources. So had to clutter infoboxes with SBS reference and they don't redundant citations. Understand it already. Babaev (talk) 0:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

No, it's easier to find SBS pages than databook pages. Babaev (talk) 1:18, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

What dishonesty are you talking about? I write the truth as it is. You just don't understand it. Babaev (talk) 8:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, this was the lie. But after I saw Luffy's profile from the Blue Deep databook, now I believe. I noticed that you messed up the Straw Hat Pirates' infoboxes again. Again, I have to fix everything for you. Babaev (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Do you understand how hard it is to find information from a databook? I repeat again, one reference is not enough. Moreover, information from the SBS is easier to find than from the databook and other sources. So had to clutter infoboxes with SBS reference and they don't redundant citations. Babaev (talk) 20:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't believe one reference is enough. Babaev (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Because Straw Hat Pirates' profile after timeskip was revealed twice, first in Blue Deep and then in SBS Volume 69. So need not only a Blue Deep reference, but also a SBS reference. But you, as always, you do not understand anything. Babaev (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

If their profile was revealed in Blue Deep and SBS, so need not only a Blue Deep reference, but also a SBS reference. How many more times do I have to repeat you? Babaev (talk) 21:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

What are you talking about right now? You don't understand, one reference is not enough. Babaev (talk) 21:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't know how and what write up a proposal in the Site Changes forum. Babaev (talk) 10:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Hey DN, please don't engage in an edit war. IMO Babaev has a point about Blue Deep being hard for most users to find and refer to, and there's nothing wrong with having two sources for certain details. It doesn't seem like Babaev wants to change how we reference across the wiki, just a few details. It could go both ways, hence starting a forum or talk page discussion.

Since Babaev doesn't know how to start a forum, could you please start one? I know onus is usually on the person who made the original edit, but you both have been engaging in the edit war. It would help stop this pattern. 14:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Seriously? Do you really believe that I started the edit warring first and you think I want to start the edit warring again? No, this is a lie. I never start an edit warring first. And I was unfairly banned. To be honest, I've always been accused of being the first to start an editing war, and that makes me the scapegoat. Babaev (talk) 23:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

It seems that you do not listen to me and do not believe me. Babaev (talk) 7:35, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

I want to talk seriously. Babaev (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Page Splitting
You don't understand, I have a serious problem with the category "Pages where template include size is exceeded". I tried to edit the pages so that they no longer belong to this category. Babaev (talk) 19:55 24 February 2023 (UTC)

And now how to resolve this issue? Babaev (talk) 20:10 24 February 2023 (UTC)

If you could do just one citation per piece of information, then why can't you do this now? Babaev (talk) 20:41 24 February 2023 (UTC)

You wrote to me that need to get permission from an admin before attempting big changes like that. Unfortunately, I don't know which administrator to get permission from. Babaev (talk) 9:48 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Something needs to be done, otherwise these pages will remain in this category. Babaev (talk) 22:56 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I read the wiki's guidelines and I'm not interested. Now the main thing is to edit the pages so that they no longer belong to this category. Babaev (talk) 0:51 1 March 2023 (UTC)

S-Hawk and S-Shark
I noticed you removed my contributions to S-Hawk and S-Shark, because now that S-Hawk also has a Devil Fruit ability while being cloned after someone who doesn't, this trait isn't unique anymore. I understand that, but I personally still think this detail should remain in both articles, albeit not being cited as unique any longer. I'm not re-editing this yet because I don't want to start a revert war, but I would like to hear your opinion anyway before and if I do so eventually.

These Devil Fruits are making me thirsty! Piposh D. Hezi 16:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Alright, I think I understand. So if you were instead of me, where would you cite this fact?

These Devil Fruits are making me thirsty! Piposh D. Hezi 19:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Re:Chapter Summaries
I apologize for that mistake. The confusion stemmed from my incorrect assumption that these events should be written in the past tense in all cases. I will try not to do that mistake anymore, I shall focus mostly on the grammar instead. Thank you for pointing that out for me.

These Devil Fruits are making me thirsty! Piposh D. Hezi 21:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

God usopp
If you don't mind me asking, why do you think the God usopp redirect should be deleted? In your latest edit you mention restoring "the original God Usopp redirect", but unless I'm misunderstanding, that redirect still exists (God Usopp). There are a lot of unused redirects that are just to make it easier for users to search; the way I see it, there's no particular reason to delete redirects as long as they're accurate. They don't count towards page count so they just exist in the background. Walrsu (talk) 02:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Were or Was?
I understand that this wikia favors American English, but which form is preferred?

"If [insert character name here] was not a pirate" or "If [insert character name here] were not a pirate"?

Several months ago I used to go with the latter, but I got into a conflict with another user (you can probably guess who) who not only undid my edits, but also accused me of trying to make a grammar error.

These Devil Fruits are making me thirsty! Piposh D. Hezi 16:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

I personally think "were" is more correct in such cases. But what if someone gets into an edit war with me over that matter (especially if it's you-know-who)?

These Devil Fruits are making me thirsty! Piposh D. Hezi 18:20, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your help.

These Devil Fruits are making me thirsty! Piposh D. Hezi 21:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)