Forum:Bounty Section for Character Pages

I think that we should add a new section for bounties for every character that has one. As discussed on this talk page, there is currently no defined place for information on past bounties for characters who have received more than one. I believe it should be its own section, and defintely not a subsection of Abilities and Powers, as bounties are a response to actions and threats, not power level.

Does anyone disagree? And what would be the best way to place and format the section? 02:46, February 16, 2017 (UTC)

I agree with this idea. I think putting it between Abilities and History would be good; basically we would list the bounties received, and when and why they were received. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 03:00, February 16, 2017 (UTC)

Instead of bounties, why don't we have it be about there reputations. I mean reputation = bounty.--Robertg27 (talk) 04:49, February 16, 2017 (UTC)

It doesn't have to be characters either, it can also be factions too.--Robertg27 (talk) 04:56, February 16, 2017 (UTC)

How about, instead of adding a section, we add them to the info box, then either cross out or write "former" next to the old ones. That would save a lot of space. 05:19, February 16, 2017 (UTC)

Adding them to the infobox makes sense. I'm surprised they're not already part of infoboxes and there's no need for an entire section for something this small 17:36, February 20, 2017 (UTC)

I think former bounties should be listed in the intro paragraph like suggested on Bart's talk page. The current bounty can be listed in the infobox. 17:39, February 20, 2017 (UTC)

Infoboxes makes sense. The problem with listing all former bounties in the intro paragraph is that that can often be more than one, and we don't want to clog it all up with numbers.

17:42, February 20, 2017 (UTC)

I agree with placement in infoboxes. Any opposition, or can we close and start making changes? 05:49, April 23, 2017 (UTC)

I support. Go for it Godess of Time Dimaria (talk) 18:48, April 29, 2017 (UTC)

On the IT wiki we do it like this, although he may be a bit cluttered in some cases, so a section in the article would work too.

I would prefer they were included in the infobox. 23:50, May 2, 2017 (UTC)