File talk:Franky Portrait.png

Silliness
I know one of you stated that "it's better to have good lighting, and a smiling portrait". Hypocritical much? 04:56, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

That's a rude introduction for a talk page. It's not about the smiling, it's about the fact that this is frontal. Your image is at an angle, and most portraits are supposed to be frontal. It's better to have a frontal portrait than an angled portrait when it comes to Franky. 05:13, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

The only fault I can find with the version uploaded by Galaxy9000 is that it's not quite a frontal one. Other than that I see no other problem with it. A full frontal is preferable but I could go with either of the two images uploaded so far. MasterDeva (talk) 05:15, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Nada's is too dark, and he's frowning, so yeah.. not a very good portrait. Never said mine was the perfect one, but it's miles above the other one. 23:23, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

It's not "too dark". Too dark would be if you can barely see it at all. An ideal portrait should be looking at a camera. 23:25, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

It's definitely too dark. He's not smiling either, which screws up the entire template. 23:26, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with what Nada has said here. It's a little dark, but not "too dark" as the darkness doesn't create misunderstandings. 12:42, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

JSD, this is a 3 month old discussion. Just wanted to make you aware that the default is the image that has been in place for the entire period. 12:46, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Use Nada's portrait. Its better. 12:48, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

As stated above, it had bad lighting. Kind of ruins the Straw Hat template, since all of them are smiling. When I get home, I'll look for a more "frontal" light image. 12:52, May 1, 2013 (UTC)