User talk:JustSomeDude...

Creepy Law is happy to answer all of your questions!
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/ag110/justsomedude7/tumblr_mcd18rooJe1qj313eo5_500_zps697b0237.gif

About me!
User talk:JustSomeBot... redirects here, because I'll never check that page.

Greetings, I'm JSD, and I'm an Administrator here. My goal as part of this community is to help make editing a great experience for everyone here, for new, old, and even unregistered users. I want to help make that happen with my privileges as an admin.

This is my talk page, feel free to leave me a message here if you ever want to communicate with me. Keep a few things in mind though:


 * Please leave your messages under a related section heading. This is one of my biggest pet-peeves on wikis.


 * If I leave a message or reply on your page, it's better that you leave your own reply here on my page, so that I am notified of your reply by both a message that pops up on wikia's toolbar (even when I'm on other wikis) and/or an email (should I be inactive at that time).


 * Communication here is public. If you would like to communicate with me privately, try to catch me in the chat.


 * I do not respond to simple, purposeless messages like "hi whats up" and I do delete them.

Anyways, I hope I can help make your experience as part of this community as pleasant as possible.

fmkff
DEMOTE ME WILL YA --Koromo

New affiliation
So the One Piece Role Playing wiki asked me for an affiliation with us. Want you hear your opinion, since we already have another fanon site like this. 01:41, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

Hey
If you have time, could you pop into the chat? Thanks. 23:55, May 30, 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, that is what I was hoping to discuss with you (the extension particularly). I guess that's that, then. 13:15, May 31, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Magellan Refs
Done. Ivankov basically said literally what needed to be reffed.

And yeah I forgot to remove the gravestone from the page after the emoticons were reinstated. Not planning to remove it though.

17:00, June 2, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Der secretest question
Do you still need to ask me that question? Because I haven't been able to find you in the chat, and you haven't responded to me on skype.--Xilinoc (talk) 00:03, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

Now I'm curious. 00:21, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Image Guidelines
Thanks for the informative help on the image guidelines (and yes it did scare me, just a little bit). When I add the episode title screen shot what type of image license should be used as the license guidelines are a bit confusing? Dragonquiz (talk) 19:17, June 14, 2015 (UTC)

Me, insulting ST?
I'm not insulting ST. I was just talking about him with Joekido and Aurora and both times I didn't start the conversation. Did you notice it? Otherwise I would have been silent.

With Aurora it sterted when I was copying his attitude, because people (like you right now) were saying that people can write that type of comments. And I accepted it. But then I can not tolerate Aurora, who said that I can't just say "no, I'm right". And then I found supernova's post, which confused more me.

With Joekido... I don't even remember how it started. You're free to check yourself.

And you say that I can write to you if I think a person deserves a ban. Ok. Then please check the link that Kaido posted twice on my talk page. I removed it both times because I felt insulted. Maybe it's not a flame, however I felt insulted. So was I allowed to remove it? --Meganoide (talk) 22:37, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Ok, ok. Does it exist a limit for the times I alert you for a person who deserves a ban? Actually, I don't care about the bans. I'd like to write to you if I think that someone deserves a warning. he It's your work to choose between a ban and a warning. --Meganoide (talk) 08:15, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

Request
Is it possible for you to make some sort of "Active Project" Template to add to pages like this, so that they show up on community messages? It's kind of a pain to have to look for the page in the activity feed or using the search bar every time. 16:32, July 1, 2015 (UTC)

Re:again
I'll stop being harsh when him and his fellows will stop to mock me. I think that this:

It appears democracy was on your side for once in 792. Happy fourth of July. 23:55, July 3, 2015 (UTC)

is a temptative of mocking my accusations. Please also read my answer to him. You will like it. --Meganoide (talk) 11:47, July 5, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry
I'm sorry for my behavior lately, and my treatment of Mega in particular; I wasn't trying to antagonize him either time but I guess things got out of hand. I think I've been on here a bit too much lately and my decision-making has gotten fatigued, so I'm giving myself a break and retreating back into the blogosphere for now. 18:39, July 5, 2015 (UTC)

It's not just the warnings, which I knew I was getting and deserved; I've actually been considering this for several days now. The amount of editing I've done recently has stressed me out to the point where I've literally felt physically ill. I'm not going to abandon articles completely, but mostly I'll do my typical chapter update edits and an occasional volume instead of the heavy patrolling I've found myself doing lately. 19:16, July 5, 2015 (UTC)

Facebook
Hey JSD, per this forum I was wondering if I could join the Facebook group. I am very active on Facebook, going on about 4 or 5 times a day. I could post chapter and episode updates since I am usually on top of those things, as well as post trivia and facts such as birthdays and things like that. 19:21, July 6, 2015 (UTC)

I'd also like to help out. I check Facebook several times a day and I was thinking maybe I could answer questions people send in like Jade and Ryu have been doing with the Tumblr. Is there a way to set up something like that with Facebook? 18:28, July 8, 2015 (UTC)

Birthday, You Fuck
This is the longest I've seen a day go by without the Birthday User getting a talk page message. Allow me. HAPPY BIRTHDAY I LOVE YOU YOU'RE BEAUTIFUL NEVER CHANGE BEST ADMIN 2016 BIRTHDAY BIRTHDAY YES. From, your secret crush. 15:46, July 7, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Finish what you start
Sure thing, I just haven't been posting on that particular one because I already threw in my two cents and all the messages after that were about my writing style in comparison to others, which I felt I couldn't really talk about without letting a whole lot of bias through. But now that it's moving onto content I can most certainly join in again.--Xilinoc (talk) 05:23, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

RE: Full Avatar
You'll have to take me out to dinner first! 02:29, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

Time to make people go mad
I consider this sentence, added by Xilinoc in the resume of his edit on chapter 702, as a direct attack to me. --Meganoide (talk) 10:23, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

Questions about the “Characters in Order of Appearance” section
Hello, I have a couple of questions about this section and I was wondering if you could help me.
 * First, sometimes various characters appear at the same exact time, so I guess the order of appearance should be from the top to the bottom and from right to left, am I correct?
 * Second, if, for example, a character only appears in the title card and at the end of the episode, should it be placed first in the order or appearance? DekkenMinus (talk) 02:48, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

I understand. Thanks for answering, it really helps. BTW, I noticed that in Episode 496, an unnamed character was included (Sabos's mom), was it an error or is it something optional? DekkenMinus (talk) 03:22, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome (for Spartan) 92.152.12.132 11:04, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Image Copyright Advice
I need advice on how your wiki managed to preserve artwork and other highly copyrighted media on your wiki despite the potential for copyright strikes from Shishuiea, Toei or others for misattribution. I need advice for a user on another animanga wiki who uploaded a bunch of raw chapter images to have a few of them strikedowned by a staff member (a valid action if its the copyright owner requesting it).

 Speedit     talk   contribs  11:59, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, man. I've credited your wiki to add image rationale templates to mine. Thanks for your help, I'm going to go to the To-Love-Ru Wiki for censorship help as your wiki is shonen and all the nudes can be just struckdown without your articles really relying on them (except some special cases I've seen while reading this wiki before my account-creation days). You should know that your wiki is an inspiration to pretty much all of the animanga wikis out there, including mine for the most part. We've got Unok-sama helping us so my buffoonery is kept in line (hehe). Hopefully our wiki will continue to grow (just after I add the fanfiction and spoiler warning to the main page).

 Speedit     talk   contribs  15:20, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

PS: I've interpreted your message "feel free to "steal" our templates" as permission to source it, after I link to this page and your template and credit you. I've also credited WP as that was your source.  Speedit     talk   contribs  15:24, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Chat emote
So any chance you could change that drinking problem one?

16:03, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Well, if you want to keep the longer one that'd work too, but thanks.

18:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Re:North Blue and Minion Island Characters
Ah, fine. I just wanted to help, but if that's unnecessary, so be it.--844996 13:44, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

Do my eyes deceive me?
JSD has...an ass avatar?!

Looks like the apocalypse is nigh --Mr. Mojo Risin&#39; (talk) 13:50, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

Oh my, you've finally accepted that asses are better than boobs? =D 14:17, August 9, 2015 (UTC)

Wait is you avi an image of... a butt "crack"?!! 17:48, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, yes to almost all questions. Boobs are still far superior, though who doesn't love some ass from time to time?

In fact, Ryu pointed out that in the original image, Nami had a terrible birth defect of having no butt crack. I asked him to fix that. I am quite pleased with the results. 17:51, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

http://i1173.photobucket.com/albums/r598/PiejoFan/Dudethatisawesome_019b536b8def1acec0ab2f66ce11537d.jpg 18:00, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Images
Hey JustSomeDude, sorry for the mess up on the images, just a quick question, how do i remove a category? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 15:01, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to explain that. I think i should be good from now on :) --Sarutobii2 (talk) 02:52, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

re:speedos
Done. In vol. 55, it was パンツ (just underwear) so I put "briefs". For vol. 61, it was 海パン (lit. sea underwear) so I put "swim briefs". 17:00, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

image guidelines
Alright so, I always try to follow the image guidelines but sometimes it seems I make errors, but I usually don't understand where I made them. Can you tell me for example which was the image guideline I did wrong (you wrote about it in my talk page)? I want to learn from the error :)

Grievous67 (talk) 08:54, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

On IT we are basically me and meganoide, and I'm also fairly busy between UNI and Wikia IVT stuff. You can also try to ask for help on central directly, staff won't to promote these things so they will probably try to help you directly.

Infobox thingy
Sure Ill help, but since I havent been checking on wikia at all, its the first time I hear about that, I need to make a quick study on it first. 15:42, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Don't make me laugh
I'll read your message even if I have not already done it. First of all I must underline a thing or two. YOU'RE THE FIRST BULLY HERE, BECAUSE YOU CONTINUE SAYING "THE RULE ABOUT BANNING IS THIS, BUT I'LL BAN FOR TWICE/THREE TIMES/FOUR TIMES". And then you insist on saying that your a fair admin? You're the first one who doesn't follow the rules. The second thing is: stop saying that you're on my side. You're just on YOUR OWN side. You decide what to do checking the popularity of your decisions. A stupid user who is supported by a lot of sheeps will gain also your support, because otherwise your autority would decrease. You disgust me. Oh my god, I expressed an opinion that goes against you!! I'm going be banned again! Well, now I'll read your message and if it needs an answer I'll write it. Just remember not to write again things like "I'm trying to help you" 'cause I don't believe in your good intentions. --Meganoide (talk) 22:51, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

As I thought your message is full or rethorical sentences and poor of honesty. I'll answer in the SBS mode, bolding your sentences to make the text easier to read. First off, you MUST listen to the concerns of other editors, this is a COMMUNITY, and if you are not available to work together with others, I don't see why I should let you edit here. I don't read only Kaido's ans SeaTerror messages, cause for sure their messages are full of insults well hidden, so you will not ban them. The only way to don't get angry is not to read them. Second, I don't want to ban you. I don't believe it. I will actually defend you from other users, because I don't want to see users being treated unfairly. I don't believe it. I'll be the first to admit that the circumstances surrounding your first ban 2 or 3 years ago were bullshit. I don't believe it. I surprisingly both like and respect you as an editor and user, and in many cases such as the recent issues with summaries, I agree with the reasons why you start shit. I don't believe it. '''I will tell other users to lay the fuck off you, behind the scenes. But you don't see that, and you waste every opportunity I give you.''' I don't care about opportunities. Let me do my work and don't disturb me. I'm a bot-man, why do you insist in talking with me? '''But the bottom line is that your behavior after you start shit makes it sooooo goddamn hard to work with you. Not just for everyone else, but for me too. You only accuse others of behaving poorly, and recently have tried to use the flimsiest of excuses to try and get other users banned out of some need for revenge or something. I am never going to ban anyone just to prove my dedication to you, I will only ban someone if they actually deserve it. In discussions, you rarely discuss the topic at hand in any detail, and only accuse members of this wiki to be stubborn, when it is you that is being stubborn.''' Since I was banned for bullshit (as you admitted) you shouldn't be surprised if I ask someone to be banned for simply bullshit. But, hey, I know thatconsistency is a rare thing. '''I want very much to make things better for you, me, and the community, and all the relationships between us. But your inability to think about and acknowledge and wrong doing on your end has made it impossible for the situation to improuve.''' I repeat: I don't care about relationship, I don't care about the community. The "community" you're talking about exists only to create the wiki. I'm not interested in improuving my relationship. I'm interested in improuving the wiki. As I said I'm a bot-man. Bottom line: It starts with you. And I started ignoring evilish people who do bullysm against me. I do not want to ban a member of my community for shit like this, especially one whose presence I feel is important to the wiki. I don't believe it. And I'm sorry for the obscenities in this message, but I'm talking in the exact language I think in, because I very much want this to be an honest message. Don't worry about the obscenities. You dind't even notice that I prefer a flaming message that a hypocrit one. Please just read this, think about it I did it. and know that I actually care I don't believe it. Meganoide (talk) 23:11, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

I was sure you would have said it. Actually it didn't seem it needed an answer. I'll read it again and look for an answer. --Meganoide (talk) 11:56, August 22, 2015 (UTC)

Even if ST didn't write to me, he still continued to undo my edits for stupid reasons. Even if Kaido's messages don't contain insults, the most sicure way to not get angry is not reading them. Because, since I believe you're not a good admin, I can't believe you when you say he's not insulting me. --Meganoide (talk) 12:01, August 22, 2015 (UTC)

Oh very good. Since I accused you now you want to ban me. That's a fair behaviour. What about your "I think you're a good editor" and other things? As I thought you were saying false things. --Meganoide (talk) 16:18, August 22, 2015 (UTC)

Re
Forum:Meganoide Looks good enough? 12:56, August 22, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Super happy.. thing
oh shit i forgot

Blog Idea
Hey JSD, I have an idea for a blog you or another file editor could write. One of the main reasons images are deleted here is because they don't have proper categories, but it's incredibly difficult to look up which categories go with which images. It would be good if there was a blog going over the categories for each type of image. 17:20, August 24, 2015 (UTC)

Well that escalated
"Please read the image guidelines and the message above before you upload any more images, or you'll face a ban. Thanks."

Jeez. 04:45, August 26, 2015 (UTC)

(^_^;) 16:30, August 26, 2015 (UTC)

Re:today's edits
So there is a misunderstanding about the meaning of "working with the commmunity". While you simply mean "work", I mean "be your buddy". I'm not interested in being your buddy. I'm interested in working. Why were those two pages empty since september 2013? And why more pages suffer the same fate? The answer is: people here is not interested in working. You, all, spend your time in the chat, and arguing about the use of one word instead of another in a sentence in a paragraph in a page, and that needs weeks of discussions. You all love two things: popularity and working on recent issues, discarding old problems. What do you think that I do on the italian wiki? I WORK, I DON'T WASTE MY TIME. In the last six month I've expanded a hundred episodes' summaries. And I'm ALONE on that wiki. Leviathan only works part-time and only on source codes. Come on, ask Xilinoc to expand my summaries, because "his summaries are perfect and can't be trimmed", am I wrong? I hope you're not waiting for my apologies. The mobbing made against my edits is unforgivable and your blindness about it is unforgivable too. --Meganoide (talk) 11:28, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not against "anybody". I just dislike three or four users. My rudeness is only towards them, and is only the consequence of their behaviour. --Meganoide (talk) 16:33, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

In a "logical" edit war, caused by different opinion, you would be right. But you're not right here, because their actions towards me are only caused by their decision to be against me. They will never change, why should they? Here's some examples: Did you like this two examples? So you DISAGREE that it's their fault? In a world in which I'm attacked without any reason there is no reason for me to make the first step. --Meganoide (talk) 18:20, August 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * This is really funny, because just now user Shadoguardian has done the same edit that I did. I should assume that his edits will be undone, because they're wrong. Right? Or maybe when I do something it's wrong, and when someone else does it it's good? SeaTerror undoes my edits even if they're logic.
 * Another example. Let's analyze the sentence "you, JSD, are going to ban me because you're a son of a bitch". Uhm, at first it may seem a flame. So you should ban me. But then - here's the magic - my sentence is no more a flame, but a prophetic sentence. Am I wrong? That's exactly the same thing that happened when Xilinoc, writing his absurd summaries, said "let's make someone angry". He mocked me, but since I really got angry his words became prophetic, so his attack was magically cancelled.

File Links
Should be fixed, sorry havent had time for wiki these days. 16:53, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Sandbox
Yeah that's fine 17:10, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Image Guidelines
Fine--844996 18:28, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

Again, you're wrong
Oh, my edit wars are old things and I should forget them? Xilinoc's stupid summaries are only two months old and Seaterror's undiscriminated rollbacks against the logic still continue, as he reverted Shadoguadian's edits. So it seems to me that the first problem is recent (and people support him and his crazy ideas) and the seconde user is always the same: an illogic user and nobody corrects him, because he's popular. Is it this what you call "the wiki has improuved in last three years"? --Meganoide (talk) 02:04, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Oh, well, since I'm going to stay here after my ban to take informations for my wiki, I'll check periodically Xilinoc's summaries to be sure that they will be trimmed. And with ST, discussions work only when I'm not the one who starts them. I started a lot of discussions, they never work, why should I continue? --Meganoide (talk) 02:28, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

You're right, I have a very bad behaviour. But I have it only with a few users, and they deserve it. They brought me to the point of directly starting my discussions insulting them, because it can be assumed that they will disagree for illogical reasons. --Meganoide (talk) 07:32, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

I acknowledge that my behavior is bad but I refuse to change it... while talking to/with those people. With other people I'm kind or at least "normal". "I'd rather get permanently banned than try to see if I can change my approach and improve those relationships"? They can't be improuved because they're acting blindly. Their actions are a clear mobbing and so I don't think there is space to improuve relationships. "I say I want to help the wiki, but I don't want to if it means I have to change my behavior"? That's not exact. I'd like to help the wiki ignoring them and not seeing my edits always reverted, working peacefully with other users. "You think I am much less logical than the 100% logical I say to be". I am wrong sometimes, but I act thinking about what it has to be done. When my edits are wrong I accept it. When my edits are good I don't accept that they are undone with no reason, only saying "it's wrong". "I assume that if I act more nicely and cooperatively, that they will still treat me the same, and that assumption has led me not to try". That's exactly what I meant. "Other people, especially Kaido and Xil are capable of change, you just don't believe it since you are so stubborn yourself". No, I don't believe it because I've seen it. Example: I explained to Xilinoc why his summaries are absurd, but he still continue to write them. People agreed (in some talk page) but he continued. Meganoide (talk) 14:19, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

Still waiting for an explanation of Xil's behaviour. Meanwhile, again and again SeaTerror undoes a perfectly logic edit. But that's not mobbing, noooo! It isn't! So WHAT IS IT??? --Meganoide (talk) 21:16, August 28, 2015 (UTC)

On wikipedia they don't use "site navigation" just for categories, if I remember well. It is absurd to do like you do, because categories are not a real part of the text of the page. They are parte of the source code, but not of the text that appears normally. Of course things change when you add naviboxes. However, while I think that the rule should change, I can accept it for now. But look at a very very very very very strange thing. I clearly said that I don't want to be your buddy, right? Do you remember it? Well, Xilinoc just called me his buddy. It is a coincidence, isn't it??? He's not trying to make me angry, right??? His behaviour is perfect, right??? He's not provoking me, right??? Do you have guts to admit that he's mocking me? --Meganoide (talk) 04:08, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Still waiting for your opinion about Xil's behaviour. --Meganoide (talk) 14:40, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

I've not asked his ban, have I? So you could have kept for yourself your "I'm not banning anyone for you". And while you accuse me of saying that he's "one of the greatest evils this place has ever seen" (a thing that I haven't done; I'm only saying that he's mocking me), you blindly say that he is "a trusted user and chat mod who knows the boundaries of the wiki". So my opinion (that actually I haven't said) is that he's totally evil and I'm wrong; but if you say that he's totally good you're right, isn't it? And you're really crazy saying that I'm constantly provoking him. Probably I've cited him one or two times. And, even if you are right (and you're not), does it make legal for him to provoke me? It seems you're saying I deserve it. You're on thin ice, with your justice which changes every day for every user. If you consider me a troll I'll not fill empty summaries as I'm doing nowadays. I'm sure that the perfect community you have will do it immediately. --Meganoide (talk) 17:06, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

The Vandalism and Ban template
Hey boss, so I'm pretty confused on how things should be dealt with. Some awc changed forearms to foreskin twice and I simply put the ban template on its talk page. ST believes even after a one-edit vandalism the vandalism template should be put, but Kage told me what I said was right. The Vandalism Rules also seem to suggest (it's not really clear) what I was doing was right. So I have no idea right now. Mind to clear it out? 21:56, September 2, 2015 (UTC)

Re:New template
I'll see what I can do. And yeah, gotcha. 08:33, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Chat Ban
Thank you. I'm not being ironic or lying here and... yeah, I admit that you're right that I harassed her. But I'll say both of us have faults here, it is just mine's bigger. I'll just use this to temporarily break away from community matters and/or just spend time on editing the objective stuff on articles like I used to do every single time before joining the chat.

EDIT: I've been really thinking of staying out of chat for a few weeks (and to get rid indefinitely), so thank you.

Chat Issues
For some reason whenever I click on the chat for the past few days it will simply show the chat but with everything blank, no chat, nothing in the sidebar and not being able to talk.

Is this a glitch or issue?

Have I been banned? I never heard anything, got in a fight or broke any rules so I doubt it. I couldn't know since I've never been banned before.

If it's none of these it most probably is a computer issue.

Thanks

Grievous67 (talk) 16:35, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Advert spammer
http://onepiece.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Playwok

Any chance you could remove this guy's stuff and ban him?

20:58, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

re:chopper
Sorry, no idea :/ 02:11, September 9, 2015 (UTC)

nvm, I searched by image on google. Apparently it's from this (From TV animation ONE PIECE 設定資料集 vol.2 by MOVIC). The Japanese part in that title roughly translates to "design collection", but ask Klobis for a better translation if you need one. Here's a full blog on it. 02:24, September 9, 2015 (UTC)

Forum
Yeah sorry I have been like dead these days.. been busy with stuff. I actually saw that guy's reply but didnt have the time to answer. Will see into that in a bit. 08:38, September 9, 2015 (UTC)

THANK YOU FOR BEING SANE ON SWORDSMEN

07:47, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

RE: I dunno
My bad, dude.

This ought to do it.

10:27, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Pings
You seem to know stuff about chat hacks so I'll ask you just in case, but recently, my pings seem to not be "pinging" me. The text turns red, and my volume is definitely (200%) on, but I just don't hear any sound. Do you happen to know anything about fixing that? 22:20, September 11, 2015 (UTC)

Technique Image Distribution
I might make a forum about this, but I wanted to ask someone who's been here for a fair bit before I do anything else: is there a rule, formal or informal, about which techniques, whether on Devil Fruit or fighting style pages, get their own images? I ask because I can't really see a pattern across pages; to illustrate, the Supa Supa no Mi has an image for almost every technique, which I personally think looks pretty good, while Okama Kenpo has one image on a list of fifteen techniques, which leaves the page looking pretty barren. Any idea what the rules surrounding this might be, or is it another example of user-by-user differences?--Xilinoc (talk) 23:21, September 15, 2015 (UTC)


 * Hm, alright, that makes sense. Danke.--Xilinoc (talk) 05:18, September 16, 2015 (UTC)

re:Swordsmen
Sorry, I don't have my volumes with me right now. Could you get me a raw? 04:03, September 23, 2015 (UTC)

Power of Destruction
http://mangafox.me/manga/one_piece/v48/c468/1.html

04:56, September 23, 2015 (UTC)

... my bad, you guys just seem to be making it into a bigger issue. It's easy to know what was said about power of destruction; because it was basically nothing.

05:37, September 23, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Issho Game Attacks.
Hello! Sorry for the delay, lately I haven't been getting many Wiki notifications so I've been missing out on certain conversations. I'll be making up for that soon and plan to start editing a bit more.

I'll get right on it! To also note something, I've never made a new section for attacks, so forgive me if I mess something up 	AsuraDrago 17:55, September 24, 2015 (UTC)

Yo.
If I'm still on chat when you see this, could you join? There's something to discuss. 21:32, September 28, 2015 (UTC)

Jigoromi
What makes you think that Jigoromi is Galaxy? His edits don't seem to fit Gal's usual MO and he contacted me on my talk page at Central, confused as to why he was banned, which really doesn't fit Gal's MO. If you know something I don't, please tell me. Otherwise, I think we should lift his ban. 23:46, September 29, 2015 (UTC)

I agree. The whole situation seemed awful trigger-happy on the admin's part and I really don't see anything to suggest a correlation between Gal and this new user. --I am a crooked man (talk) 23:55, September 29, 2015 (UTC)

Links
Bot, man. Leave it to me. 17:40, October 2, 2015 (UTC)

Ok those links are all fixed. What are we splitting now? 09:19, October 3, 2015 (UTC)

I have split Heppoko, Peppoko and Poppoko too. Yeah Ive been looking for some codes this weekend for the infoboxes, but my problem is that I dont have more than an hour's time per day for wikia, and I need to work on the for quite MUCH time to make them what I want them to look like. Anyway, I highly doubt I will have any time to check on them today since i finish my classes on 10 pm, but tommorrow I will probably be able to. 10:41, October 5, 2015 (UTC)

Again
You don't need a translator for something that Oda flat out spelled out in English. SeaTerror (talk) 03:23, October 5, 2015 (UTC)

So sorry about not following the image guideline, thank you for pointing me to a blog telling me what to do. :D

Fusionater (talk) 10:13, October 5, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Random idea?
Sure. 15:06, October 5, 2015 (UTC)

re:Overprotection of Pages
I'll go with that for now. So long as we can keep up with any potential vandalism with our crack-team of editors. I guess it's only fair for the editors to have a chance to edit. 05:41, October 7, 2015 (UTC)

Straw Hats Pirates
Hello i was pointed in your direction when i made a request in the chat for an addition to the One Piece Wiki, Where the allies are listed in the Straw Hat Pirate's page, i would like to possibly see all of the pirates in the Grand Pirate Fleet. I elieve they are all just as much of an allie to Luffy as the Heart Pirates at this point. Sry. i would add this myself but i dont know how to edit wikis. :/.

Thank you for your time! User talk:A.J.Nye825

Thankful for the advice
Hey, thanks for the tip-off, JustSomeDude! At some point I feared this was too many a day, but the recent chapters have been a flood of new post-timeskip content and there were no uploaders, so I took the day to help the wiki.

Yes, a talking panel definitely isn't as good as an action panel (as they say, show, don't tell). Except it's a double-edged sword when the panel offers you something that's worth noting in terms of appearance. A lot of characters have just made their first post-timeskip appearances, and it felt as though Oda's panels as of late have been drawn in such a way that the text boxes obscure the image of the person in view, (the ones with Buggy being the worst offenders, and Burgess's face having a huge bubble over his mouth). Usually, I try to preserve the figure of the person in the image where a speech bubble is overlaid, but if you would like them sheared out, I can crop the uploaded images down a little bit more.

Thanks for the constructive feedback! Thunderush (talk) 04:53, October 10, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Roll back rights
Hey! I apologize for not mentioning that earlier. I am pretty inactive in every wiki atm and this is not going to change I'm afraid. Of course it is your choice to handle the user rights and taking them away would make sense. Cheers!

Skype
If you could get on Skype or chat as soon as you can, that would be great. Skype is preferable because chat PM has a tendency to get wonky, but it's your choice. --Koromo (talk) 20:29, October 11, 2015 (UTC)

Possible Gal
Does this sound familiar at all?  21:30, October 12, 2015 (UTC)

Issues
Get on chat ASAP. 14:56, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

Bad Page
Could you delete Chapter 804 and semi-create protect it, as AWCs have made this page at least three times now. 17:35, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

Language help template
I was thinking maybe we should create a template like Active Discussion to tag all the discussion that are in need of a "language consult" (a.k.a Klobis/Jopie help). What do you think? I have no idea how to call it though.

One Piece: Pirate Warriors 3
I think you should keep the  Plot Alterations & Storyline Differences because it adds valuable insight to the game.

TonyTonyChopperTheEditor (talk) 23:17, October 25, 2015 (UTC)TonyTonyChopperTheEditor

Stop removing the glitches section.
Will you stop censoring the truth about the broken PC port?!

Are you working for Scamco / Koei?!

If so shame to you!

At least move the info in the trivia. People must know of the said bugs before paying 50 EUR for a broken PC port!

OsmundNeuron (talk) 07:13, October 28, 2015 (UTC)OsmundNeuron

With you talking like that is why he's doing that

Joekido (talk) 07:20, October 28, 2015 (UTC)

Delete Process Question
I accidentally created the Extra Isle page here when I meant to be on the treasure cruise wiki. I changed it to a redirect to the game page One Piece Treasure Cruise for now as I wasn't sure what the strategy was for games and if it belonged on this wiki. Should I mark it for deletion or just leave it as a redirect until that concept is further expanded here? Apologies for the mistake. --Unatratnag (talk) 17:29, October 28, 2015 (UTC)

One Piece PW 3 PC broken
Bans can't scare me. Nothing can.

But I do gave up already. It's useless trying to share something and get censored. Scamco win with their Broken PC port. Game is great on PS3/PS4/XB but not on PC.

BTW good wikipedia. Sorry my intention was only truth to be shared not something I have just decided to. All I did was for the PC players to be aware what they pay for. Guess I am out of luck here. No one visits the talk page so sharing stuff there is useless. Anyway.

I am not a cheeky person so don't think I will continue trying...as I said it's useless. If you do not remove what I post others do so no point for me trying to share bugs stuff.

Good luck with the wiki. And glad you aren't some jerk using Admin rights to self-defense in arguments.



OsmundNeuron (talk) 09:19, October 29, 2015 (UTC)OsmundNeuron

Cultural References
Why are you saying: "Not needed. Keep the references on the relevant articles"? I can't add this information in the section of Gear Second (that article don't even have a trivia section and one of the info is about the Gear 2nd), so I want to add those references in one only article).Dragon NJMB (talk) 16:26, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hi, I have a request. Could you please warn this user for undoing all the edits I did using this IP address (changing romanization for vs to Bāsasu), and make him fix them back to way I did them? The edits I made are clearly correct; if you look at the Chapters and Volumes page you'll see that recent chapters are done correctly, like Chapters 662, 681, 729, 751 and 777. Other examples of correctly romanizing English lettering can be seen in Chapters 593, 596, 597, 601, 667, 677, 690, 731, 778 or 789, along with many others. Discrimination against IP edits should not be tolerated - in fact, the reason why I stopped halfway was because I knew that he or some other clueless editor would undo my edits, just because I choose to edit anonymously, like has happened many times in the past with other IP addresses. I'm sick of it, and the practice of regularly undoing legitimate edits based on who makes them, without doing any research to see what's actually correct is destructive to the wiki. 167.160.116.166 01:39, November 15, 2015 (UTC)