Category talk:Characters by Gender

Males/Females
No one would have a problem with it going from X Characters to just X right, (i.e. Males/Females)?--Rgilbert27 (talk) 16:50, April 5, 2019 (UTC)

I can assume that no one will have a problem then?--Rgilbert27 (talk) 22:02, April 6, 2019 (UTC)

I support it. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 23:40, April 6, 2019 (UTC)

I opppose, current format sounds better. 07:58, April 8, 2019 (UTC)

I agree with Kage. 12:56, April 8, 2019 (UTC)

Changing it won't improve the wiki in any way, also, you can't assume a disscusion is over only one day after it's been opened. 13:16, April 8, 2019 (UTC)

The Characters part isn't necessary it can just be Males or Females plus it would reduce byte count.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 13:35, April 8, 2019 (UTC)


 * Supporting this suggestion. Also much more concise since we have no real humans on board besides Oda. (please remove the colon in Source mode unless directly replying here)
 * (Right, Ed?) 14:29, April 8, 2019 (UTC)​

This category is pretty pointless. Also Okama is not a gender anyway. SeaTerror (talk) 18:23, April 8, 2019 (UTC)

If we do that, so for consistency we should remove the word "Characters" from any sub-category in Category:Characters, and sub-sub-category and so on. Being "Female" or a "Female Character" is the same, so what's wrong with keeping things as they are? Also, ST, the Okama topic should be discussed separably. Rhavkin (talk) 04:24, April 11, 2019 (UTC)

Because there's no real world pages, other than Oda, characters should only be referred to as males or females.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 04:36, April 11, 2019 (UTC)

I don't see what "real world" pages have to do with this. Byte count is a decent point, but I don't think removing the word "Characters" will create a significant decrease. 18:45, April 11, 2019 (UTC)

Characters implies that there's real world male and female pages while just Males and Females are the in-series ones.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 18:55, April 11, 2019 (UTC)