Talk:Final Saga

Rename
I propose changing the name to Fifth "Eleventh Saga". It is a more specific and accurate name going by the information we have so far. The oft-cited tweet doesn't use the same term that we do for "saga". Having it labeled "Final Saga" feels premature at this point and could also be setting us up for another situation like the "Four Emperors Saga" split. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree, the term "Final" has been announced but it's quite possible that the arcs will not all be linked, especially with regard to the future confrontation against Blackbeard, the World Government and the journey to Laugh Tale. Afterwards, I don't know if the term "Fifth Saga" is the best, maybe "New Pirate Age Saga", "New Pirate Era Saga" or "New Era Saga" compared to the fall of Kaidou and Big Mom (the last pirates of the old generation) and the advent of the new pirate era. GoldTesoro (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

You don't need to look at me. I'm not the one who created the article. Newgate438738743 (talk) 21:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

I agree with renaming to something else, but I'm not sure about "Fifth Saga" either. This is only the fifth saga post-timeskip, not overall, and the numbering may also be subject to change. Perhaps simply "Current Saga"? 21:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * It can also be suitable, it's almost certain that the name will have to change when we have the main goal of this saga, you just need a simple name so that it's easy for the bot to modify the name of the saga when we have a definitive name in few months. GoldTesoro (talk) 22:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

I think Final Saga is fine. It's conjectural as a name, but is rooted in an official statement. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Calling it a Final Saga is accurate for now. Knowing Oda it might subject to change in the future.

Joekido (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Oops, I got my numbers flipped; I should've put 11, not 5. While a recent upset changed our counting, the official saga-breakdown probably won't end up changing much again, especially not before we get a clearer view of the saga and a name for it. Yes, the numerical title isn't very appealing, but that's kind of the point: to be objective about it since we have so little off of which to build. Ones like "New Pirate Age Saga", "New Pirate Era Saga" or "New Era Saga" are exactly what I would want to avoid here. They also don't match well with the actual saga names we already have. Again, the staff tweet is a rather weak root. It isn't even really about this saga itself and suggests Issue 34 (Chapter 1054) as the beginning, rather than 1058 where we're currently placing it. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 04:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Infobox Image
Since there has been an edit war over the suitability of the infobox image, discuss it here. Are there any alternative image suggestions? 21:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't know if it's the best solution, but I see the image of the Four Emperors of Chapter 1054 in this place, it represents the new era of pirates. Otherwise, the image of Chapter 1060 can do the trick for the moment, at least until Oda does a color spread that will better represent the new saga and arc. GoldTesoro (talk) 22:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I just took the current one because it represent "final" best. I'm agreeing the complete version is too much. But i have no idea about alternatives. Newgate438738743 (talk) 22:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't have a problem with the image, it was the tease for the final part of OP which this saga is generally considered to be. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Truly a final saga.
It is clear that this saga was meant to be the final Arc, why can't we just say it is the final saga.

Joekido (talk) 06:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

"Knowing Oda it might [be] subject to change in the future." Dragonus Nesha (talk) 14:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)