File talk:Anime Sanji Post Timeskip Infobox.png

What a Horrible Night to Have an Edit War
Discuss here. More detailed, or less "awkward"? That's actually a very vague reason to not have it. 22:45, January 12, 2013 (UTC)

Simple. No poses in the infobox. Mine is neutral, and therefore better. Find a better one, or mine is good. 22:50, January 12, 2013 (UTC)

Except it isn't detailed very well compared to the other. The position isn't THAT big of a problem. He's slightly lifting his leg. That's all. It's barely a pose. Yours isn't detailed. Find a detailed one, or yours is bad. 22:52, January 12, 2013 (UTC)

"What a Horrible Night to Have a Curse" - The Black Dahlia Murder.

I think the Unknownada's image is the best because it's of a higher quality and doesn't have a watermask that covers 50% of his face. Do you even know what a pose is?

Didn't notice the watermark. Guess that's another reason. Heh.

And that's a quote from Castlevania 2, not Black Dahlia Murder. 22:56, January 12, 2013 (UTC)

This discussion is redundant. The one Nada and I reverted back is so much better compared to Galaxy's. If you keep calling that picture as a "awkward" pose, then why don't you call Franky's current infobox picture awkward? They're actually similar, such as the angle. So literally it's three against one who want to keep it. 04:29, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

If it wasn't for the watermark, I'd agree with Gal's version. But there is a watermark... Anyways, this picture should still be replaced with something else because the pose is a bit awkward (though still acceptable since it's just a mildly awkward pose, and not a forbidden action pose). The whole knee thing throws off the perspective of his height, which is something that infobox pictures need. 22:08, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Part 2
Gal's new version is fine, and it's better than the other one because he's in a more normal position. 20:45, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

The other image was fine too. How many times are you people going to ignore the fact that the tv watermarks are fine? SeaTerror (talk) 21:07, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

It was covering his face ST. Anyways, yeah, this one is good. 21:25, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

No it's not, his face is abnormal and deformed. Am I the only one can't see the watermark? I see one in the corner of the picture, but there's none covering his face. I remember reading a guideline that said that TV watermarks are fine. 01:30, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

So just for clarification, this is the watermarked image. This is the new one, and this is the other one I believe we were using before. 01:57, January 27, 2013 (UTC)