User talk:BattleFranky202

Hello, welcome to OP Wiki, your name sound fimiler so by any chance that you are same Battle Franky from AP.net forum as a Moderator?

Joekido

Hello
No. I just gave myself that name because i like Franky.

I'm glad I found this place! I love wikipedia and one Piece, and there are many articles in need of filling!

AP Forums
Huh? No, not all of them are. I happen to be one of the members of that site and I was a short-lived editor of the AP.net. Angel, Marsuki, and SigmasonicX are members of the forum as well.

Most of them hated Wikipedia due to it's cheap articles, poor page quilty, fanboyism and balant writing. They find that site to be a bad source and stupid rules. We don't want One Piece Wiki to stuffer the same as Wikipedia and we are to be 100% indepandance of them with our rules and we want this site to satifiy the One Piece fans and we want this site to become an popular hub for One Piece to enjoy and find information, we want a postive feedback from AP forums so it's better not to follow Wikipedia.

O RLY?
okay, then.

I'll do my best!

Favour
http://onepiece.wikia.com/wiki/Wikia_Main_Editors_Page#BattleFranky202

Can you write a brief short intro there please? ;) One-Winged Hawk 18:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Done
How is it?

-BF202

WTH!?
While your work was great, I really have nothing against you. Had I done this in the desktop computer I would have a easy time putting the summry in the "Long Summery" section and move the story mini-arc to the "Mini-story" section. I grew disappointed that no one is following the Chapter page layout that I setted up in chapter 431 and chapter 432 and plus the links are not like this: [Chapter (insert number here) -(insert title here)|(insert title here)].

I felt it was my fault for not setting up the layout all across the chapter monthes eariler, Had I done this, your work would not be deleted. I hold responsible for my actions, it's all because of my laziness mothes back that your work disappeared.

Now I'm trying to set up the layout plan on all 437 chapters before the same mistake happens.

I will recover your lost work after I fix the chapter pages

---

Okay, thanks for explaining that to me.

-BF202

BTW your work is restored, easy with the unnessassary "!"

Joekido

---

Thay, you're probably right.

-BF202

I Apology
I was sorry that i banned you yesterday and thanks for help me with One Piece Encyclopedia so it can be active after I logged out from the site 9 months ago.

---

Not prob.

-BF202

Double check
Can you run a double check on these guys BF Category:Seiyū in here. I spotted a few doubles in there this afternoon when I was catagory tagging pages. But you seem to know more about them then me. One-Winged Hawk 19:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

---

What do you mean "These guys" and double check?

-BF202, December 23, 2006


 * I was generalizing the Japanese voice actors... I was asking you to double check there are not doubles (people in the category twice). O.o' One-Winged Hawk 19:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

---

OH! Okay, but how do I do that?

-BF202, December 23, 2006


 * Oh. Excuse me... I'm having a coding failure moment everyway I end right now, I did a mistake with the linking there.  Anyway, just go through that category I've put here and the pages and see if there are doubles there.  There were about 3 when I looked, as I said there may be more.  One-Winged Hawk 19:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

---

Oh, okay then, i'll get on it.

-BF202, December 23, 2006

Templates
I'll have to explain everything to help you, so I apologise if you already know some of this stuff.

To create a template itself well... Firstly, they have to start Template: with then have a name on them. Everything on the template will appear on a page, you just have to put the name of the template in between. Then they just appear on the page.

To access them you can go to the "search feature" and type their name. Alternativly, go to the page they appear on and click the edit on that page, the templates will be listed at the bottom on the edit page. Lastly some of the templates can be found in the category:Templates.

Hope that helps. You should learn about templates quickly, you will need them. ;) One-Winged Hawk 18:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * BTW they edit like any other page. One-Winged Hawk 18:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

---

Thanks!

-BF202, December 24, 2006

Only/Onyl/Olny/whatever
I'm mild dyslexic (I can read + write, just my skills are notable to be below standards for my age). I'm suprised to here others doing it here with that in mind since (I'm actually used to people correcting me). I usually have to tweak up all my edits with half a dozen minor ones due to such mistakes. The other cause of it is of course - mild Dyslexia.

Very sorry, I'm not perfect even I proof read my stuff I miss things. One-Winged Hawk 10:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

No vote
New Admin vote page

We need you to vote here. You don't have to be too long. Just quickly done with it. One-Winged Hawk 21:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Me, vote? Eh, I really don't care if I become an Admin or not.

Your an Admin
Hello, BF, just to remind you that you are now an Admin, so you have the power to delete pages.

(Joekido 19:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC))


 * Whoa! Seriously?!  Awesome!  I won't let you guys down!  Or at least, I'll try not to. - BattleFranky202 19:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

We decided it's Arabasta
We have much more proof for it. Stop going to other pages and changing things to Alabasta. We ad this discussion awhile ago, and if you wanted to add proof for the initial decision, that was the best time. You have to learn to compromise too. I prefer Bon Clay and Juraquille Mihawke. But We use Bon Kurei and Dracule. You can't have every article named the way you want, if you like the name better for a particular reason, than the best thing to do is bring it up on a talk page. Since that already happened and we've decided Arabasta is more correct, it's going to take Oda coming out and saying, in guaranteed well translated English, "It's Alabasta" to have use use it. Everything else. I got away form the point though, in short, we've decided, if you can get more proof for Alabasta than Arabasta, feel free to bring it up again. Cody2526 07:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)