User blog comment:DancePowderer/No Room at the Inn, Deductive Reasoning/@comment-2226235-20150612202422/@comment-1595565-20150612223912

When it comes to ambiguous cases, I agree as long as the option has little to no room for error. For instance, say we never completely learn if Lola and Big Mom are related, but Big Mom mentions a daughter sailing back from the new world. Now, all evidence would clearly point to Lola at that point, but at the same time, there's still a decent amount of room for error. Now, if Big Mom mentions her daughter and her crew getting stuck on Thriller Bark for a while, then we could move ahead and say it without having to hear her flat out say "Lola is my daughter", but we shouldn't always make a definitive move on ambiguous cases like that.