Talk:Loki

Age
The flashback started 63 years ago and then (when we see Oimo and Kashi) it says 10 months later. That occurred some time AFTER Linlin entered Sheep's House. Loki could very well be 62 and if there is a reasonable "If" we put nothing until confirmed. Rhavkin (talk) 15:16, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

It should be the same year though, since it was Linlin's first winter solstice. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 16:01, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

Just put "Around 63" then. 16:08, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

The last festival could have been a week before she was abandoned. And it still should be "around 62" because it's closer than 63 even if it was the some year. Rhavkin (talk) 16:10, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

Well then, put down 64

Joekido (talk) 04:01, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

Assuming a year could have passed is ridiculously speculative. A year hasn't passed since "63 years ago", we have a hard number, no need to speculate. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 19:47, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

10 months passing is close enough to a year, especially when we don't know the exact month Linlin parents abandoned her, how long she waited by the beach before entering Sheep's house, how long is it been since the 10 months skip has started (since it was some considerable time after Linlin entered Sheep's House- enuogh for her to do many thing for Carmel to forgive her for). Rhavkin (talk) 19:53, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

Just put 63 to 62 years old then. 19:57, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

We don't even know if "63 years" meant 63 years exactly, but I think we generally just count in years to come up with the ages. Here there's a 10-month skip so I guess we can put "62-63". 20:29, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

I'm fine with having it be 62 to 63 Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 20:50, May 26, 2017 (UTC)