Category talk:Mini-Arc Covers

Splitting into different categories
This category doesn't seem too useful the way it is now. If there's sufficient support, I'd like to (with some help) split them up so that each mini-series has its own category. Is there any good reason why it isn't that way already, or why it shouldn't be that way? 07:11, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

I missed this. We should definitely do this (and also remove the Chapter Covers category from the images that have both, because it's redundant categorization). 09:02, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

We should just do it. Nobody has objected. 04:14, August 13, 2013 (UTC)

Seems like a good idea to me. But what would you do with cover series that aren't arcs like "Straw Hats and Animals" etc? 12:54, August 14, 2013 (UTC)

Put them in a Straw Hats and Animals category. 07:07, August 15, 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. 13:24, August 15, 2013 (UTC)

Yup I agree too. 16:55, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

i agree-- 17:09, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Time to get things started, I guess. There's already a Straw Hat and animals category (although it should be named Straw Hats and Animals, which can be dealt with via bot, and it's missing the post-timeskip chapters), so we just need to do the mini-series. What format do we want to name them? Just or ? 06:57, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

I am leaning towards the one with "covers" at the end just because it is more descriptive and because this category also has "covers" in it and we are replacing this category for those ones. 15:32, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I figured that too. Can't really think of any reason not to have "Covers" so I'm not sure why I brought it up. I'll create the categories then. 15:47, August 22, 2013 (UTC)