Forum:Remove the "Read More" section

I think it's good enough to remove the "Read More" section from all the pages..we've got Site Navigation which serves the same purpose.

So..what do ya think ?.. :)

It can be done by adding the following code to MediaWiki:Wikia.css: nav.RelatedPagesModule { display: none; } Ruxax 16:35, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

No not that,I'm talking about the Related Articles heading on many pages (example:Monkey D. Dragon).(sorry for the inconvenience I caused)


 * Oh those things ar suppose to list the x most important related pages. I don't know, they seem pretty pointless nowadays, I guess they were a tradition bought over from wikipedia thats long since become dated. Did we need them? I don't think so. O.o One-Winged Hawk 11:15, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify what this is about, you are speaking of the "featured article"..thing?
 * If so, agree. 11:29, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * If so, agree. 11:29, May 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, he talks about the "Related Articles" section in some pages. The layout guidelines describe it as "A quicklist of articles related to this one, such as important characters and groups". This seems unneeded, the naviboxes do the job better I think. sff9 (talk) 12:39, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. Yeah, unnecessary. 16:34, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

I don't mind keep the "read more" section because it's more eyes-catching than the navigation templates, but if most of people think it's useless then do as you like. leviathan_89  17:08, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Wait wait, I'm not against the "read more" section, maybe roranoa should change the first line of the thread to avoid confusion. What we are talking about is this (in Dragons case):

Related Articles (Example)

 * Monkey D. Luffy


 * Monkey D. Garp


 * Revolutionary Army


 * Emporio Ivankov


 * Bartholomew Kuma


 * Baltigo

Right? 17:31, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's what I understood. sff9 (talk) 19:13, May 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * You should have said "Related Articles" because everyone would have known that. Honestly, I like their presence on there but I don't think their needed anymore. One-Winged Hawk 21:13, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * And I said what? Or are you referring to Roranoa? 21:31, May 13, 2011 (UTC)