Talk:Jun Giant

Translation Confusion
No offense, everyone, but isn't it possible some translation site miswrote "John" as "Jun"? I'm just saying.--Observer Supreme 21:45, June 5, 2017 (UTC)

Talk:John Giant - Dragonus Nesha (talk) 22:10, June 5, 2017 (UTC)

This is pretty obviously John Giant. Someone with a low level of familiarity with English/the canon must be responsible.86.12.191.4 11:30, June 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * I guess we'll see how it goes.--Observer Supreme 12:37, June 6, 2017 (UTC)

Again, it would be Oda's mistake. Could he have forgotten John Giant's name? Sure, it's possible, but we'll see. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 13:39, June 6, 2017 (UTC)

There is a one stroke difference between the two names. There's no way this could be anything but a typo. 21:04, June 6, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, well, until/unless the tankobon corrects it, we can't take things into our own hands and assume. 01:14, June 7, 2017 (UTC)

God this is annoying. We're going to have misleading information for months. 01:16, June 7, 2017 (UTC)

It's beyond embarassing that the page is still here. Not only is the probability of Jun and John being different characters vanishingly slim, but the harm of removing this page ~should Jun not exist~ is smaller than that of perpetuating the myth if he doesn't.

This is exactly the instance where rules need to be checked if they actually apply or not, and appropriately revised. The rule in its current form is meant for a larger issue than this, and is scaling very poorly when strictly applied. Would anyone be actually upset if Jun was deleted? Consider instead how many people would be upset if John Giant was deleted. 86.12.191.4 15:24, July 13, 2017 (UTC)