User blog comment:AnonymousAnomani/Any wikia admins are considered biased towards any and all wiki users and will not hesitate to write off anything deemed speculation./@comment-3986064-20180503015354/@comment-53539-20180510181335

Circumstantial evidence is speculation if you state it as fact.

It should not be allowed on the wiki either, things should be black and white and if anything is not black and white it needs to be removed.

For example, we can speculate Luffy's strength is growing but we don't not need to add this as its speculation. Sure we can see it before our eyes, but there is also the possibility he isn't getting stronger but who he faces is getting weaker (ridiculous, yes, but not everyone he has fought is a Yonkou). If Oda flat out states it, then its considered factual.

I brought this up in regards to calling Robin and Nami "beautiful", as beauty is subjective and varies per person. Therefore, you couldn't just leave "they are beautiful" on the page. By now, Oda's more or less addressed this enough for it to be left on the page in SBSs. Its the same thing with speculation.

This is not now an excuse to enter lots and lots of edit wars to remove things that often end up not being speculation at all, I don't think anyone wants that. =_=