Talk:Smoker

Zoro Saving Smoker
What episode was it when zoro saved smoker from drowning??95.93.121.210 19:06, April 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * 109 Tipota 19:27, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Speed
When he display speed similar to soru during his first encounter with luffy?He only used his devil fruit to knock out sanji and subdue luffy. UsoppSpell 22:01, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

anime only78.23.240.235 11:18, December 8, 2010 (UTC)

Smoker isint really a villain just a Marine officier and is against the corrupt Marine leadership Smoker rocks!!! hes a smoke man! 24.23.162.249 20:56, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Hair colour
The description of his appearance becomes a bit jumbled over the hair colour. Is his hair supposed to be still grey in the anime or is it light green?

His hair in the anime is gray. The green is just used for highlighting, similar to how zoros pants occasionally appear green although they are black. Oh, and please sign your posts with four of those ~ Panda 18:08, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I can't edit it myself. But there si a typo on this page.

History>Baroque Works Saba>War in Alabasta.

It says: "Once out of the trap, Smoker tells Luffy to go to Alabasta, but next time they meet, they will battle"

But it sould say: "Once out of the trap, Smoker tells Luffy to go to Alubarna, but next time they meet, they will battle"

Alabasta is the whole country, they're already in alabasta (when this is said), but they are in the Rain Base city (where crocodile casino is) and they must go to Alubarna city (where the palace is).

Please, somebody who can, edit this and delete this message.

ViscaV 23:43, November 20, 2011 (UTC)ViscaV

Thanks for noticing.. I changed it ok..

Haki
Now that he is a Vice Admiral, we can clearly say he has haki. All of Vice Admirals are known to have haki. And Smoker is now a part of them.

I agree this totaly proves it now. 02:24, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

This proves absolutely nothing. 02:44, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

Let me elaborate on that: It is completely baseless to presume that just because he is a vice admiral now he is able to use haki. The main reason for this is that in the vice admiral haki reference all marines of vice admiral class and above are able to make use of this ability" it doesn't state whether this only refers to the current bunch of vice admirals or whether it is a prerequisite for the position. Let's say all the boyscout leaders of a boyscout group are able to use a compass it would be "all boyscout leaders and above are able to use a compass" Now one of them dies in a tragic hiking accident, and they get a new one. Does he automatically know how to use a compass, just because his predecessor did? Of course not. I'd really appreciate if one of our japanese speaking editors could look at the raw of chapter 594 to clarify that translation. Because if it could mean "all the marines of vice admiral class and above are able to make use of this ability" then it points to the current bunch of vice admirals even more, instead of being a prerequisite for the job. 03:18, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

Wheres the syphillis example..? It was better than this one :P .. But seriously, all Marines that are Vice Admirals or higher have haki.. Admirals and Fleet Admirals too...

Because you said so or do you have any evidence? And the syphilis example was scrapped, since this is a PG talk page :D 03:25, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

It was on the manga and the syphillis example was better!!!

I found an alternate translation from iNaruto. "That's...What all the vice admiral class Marines use!" That means all the vice admirals. You're being too narrowminded by only applying it to the ones at the time the line was said. Why would future vice admirals be exempt from having to be able to do it? All vice admirals can use it, past, present, and future. They wouldn't be va's if they couldn't. 03:34, January 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * The translation you provided makes it sound like it only refers to the to the ones at the time even more, as it is referring to a group of people, not to a job description. " Why would future vice admirals be exempt from having to be able to do it?" That's just the point though. Nowhere does it say that they have to be able to use it, it just says that they are. 03:39, January 12, 2012 (UTC)