Talk:Kazekage

Identity
In episode 928 subtitles, 風影's name is not showed. So we can't decide who 風影 is. --Klobis (talk) 13:03, April 13, 2020 (UTC)

It is fukage also if you see this tweet you will see why he is fukage. . This oage should be deleted. 13:12, April 13, 2020 (UTC)


 * It is fukage: There is no furigana for the name. How do you know it is Fukage?
 * if you see this tweet: It is a guess by a fan. It means speculation. --Klobis (talk) 13:17, April 13, 2020 (UTC)

風影 could be Fukage or Kazekage, but we probably choose the latter because the ninjas are tributes to Naruto. A page called by kanji is really hard to search, so we should use a romanized name.--Mangautente01 (discussioni) 21:15, April 13, 2020 (UTC)

Aight, so is there a way of identifying this character? If we can't tell who it is, then this page should be deleted on account of providing no information (and the page name being in kanji).

If we can identify the character, I think we should decide on the most probable romanization and move the page to a romanized title. IMO, it's better to give the page an accessible title for searching even if it turns out to be wrong and we have to move it - of course, we should note the other potential romanizations in the article - than giving it an inaccessible title that may be technically correct, but would still be moved to the romanized spelling when we learn it. I don't think there'd be much to lose by just deciding on a romanized name, if we know who the character is. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 22:42, April 14, 2020 (UTC)

I agree with Kaido. If we can identify the character, the page should not stay in kanji. If we can't ID the character, delete the page for now. 01:13, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

I'm with Kaido and Noland. It's just ridiculous to have a Kanji article on an English website, so please find the right name, or get rid of this for now.Awareness Bringer 14:34, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

The page name should be reverted to "Fukage", and have information about the ninja from the tweet. Worst case scenario, the name and images could change. As for the why that ninja, the tweet is the only source we have, and we have nothing contradicting this, we had Bishamon identified the same way. Rhavkin (talk) 16:01, April 15, 2020 (UTC)