Talk:Orochi Oniwabanshu

Honorific o
Why is this article written entirely with the honorific o included, when others such as Tama are not? • Seelentau 愛 議 20:04, February 1, 2019 (UTC)

Well, I had initially named the article going on Jaimini's translation, and had no way of knowing it was an honorific O as opposted to the O in Orochi or Onigashima. So to clear things up, I assume the O- prefix can apply to groups as well? Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 19:29, February 3, 2019 (UTC)

Yup. • Seelentau 愛 議 12:43, February 6, 2019 (UTC)

I'd prefer keeping it as Oniwabanshu since the honorific version of the historical term seems more universally used. It would feel awkward to drop the o from the middle of the full group title. I don't think we have as strict naming guidelines for non-character articles. 16:49, February 6, 2019 (UTC)

So you want to introduce more inconsistency to the already inconsistent guidelines? • Seelentau 愛 議 21:50, February 6, 2019 (UTC)

I would personally like to wait to see how people address them. If they get called the Niwabanshu, then I'd be fine with renaming. If only Oniwabanshu is used, though, then I think it'd be better to leave it. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 03:20, February 7, 2019 (UTC)

They won't be called that, for the same reason Robin won't be called "Robi" instead of "Orobi". But leaving this article with an honorific O and others like Tama not, would again be inconsistent. There's no difference between a name and a name. • Seelentau 愛 議 12:31, February 7, 2019 (UTC)