User talk:Defchris


 * Please add a new section with caption. TIA. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 16:31, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Talk page edits
Hi Defchris, In Forum:Broken Links on User, Talk, and Forum Pages it was deiced that users could edit other people's content if it would help with the formatting of the wikia as a whole. So in this edit, Besty was just replacing a .jpg with a .png so that it wouldn't be listed in Category:Pages with broken file links once the .jpg version was deleted, and it is not vandalism. We've been making similar edits with the NoPic template to forums, talks, user pages, etc for a few weeks, but it's better for everyone if people can just link to the new version of the same picture, just as Besty was doing. Thanks. 20:42, January 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Then something really changed here from the initial warnings towards Meganoide about not editing redirect links...
 * I know that pages with broken image links are enlisted there. But there's an easy way to prevent them from that: Don't delete images used on talk pages, as they can be enlisted in Category:Images Used only at Talk Pages once they are replaced in articles. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 21:05, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Why would we do that? The images are the exact same, but in png format. Really no reason to not just replace the extension. 21:06, January 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * As much I'm going to explain to you, that wikia had enough space for having such duplicates for talk pages, and that I'm sick of visiting this site with mobile and tablet, you're not going to listen anyways, Galaxy9000. So, would you just back off in this matter, please? -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] ·

Doesn't matter if we have enough space or not. There's no reason to have duplicates of other files. Not sure how you viewing the site with your phone or tablet matters at all in this discussion. 21:13, January 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * We've already talked this through. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 21:23, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

No you haven't. SeaTerror (talk) 21:25, January 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh yes, we did. You were simply banned wikia-wide and couldn't troll the discussion. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 21:47, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Look, all the images we use in every article are shrinked with the thumb function, which makes them faster to load. I don't understand your problem with the loading speed of an article since obviously they load fast enough, since the difference in file-size between a .jpg and .png that are shrinked that much is not much. And if you're on your mobile internet on a wiki, which often uses lots and lots of images, you shouldn't expect it to load fast, whether or not they are .jpgs.


 * The image Besty put on the Talk Page is 45.8 kB large. The JPEG is only 6.26 kB. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 21:44, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Again
Remove your talk page messages again, and I'm putting a ban template on your userpage. That's all. 22:46, January 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't care. Really. How often do I have to repeat that I don't care what actions you, Galaxy9000 or SeaTerror are going to take. That's why SeaTerror joined the discussion above in the first place. Forum:Defchris. Just go on. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 22:49, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Nobody is against you Defchris. I wouldn't be undoing you if it weren't for you blatant breach of policy. I'm not starting a ban forum, because in my opinion, it's not that big yet. 22:53, January 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't care if anyone is for or against me. SeaTerror came here to troll the discussion as he always does. I remove troll comments on my talk pages whether anyone allows this or not. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 23:00, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

But he wasn't trolling as far as I could see. You don't like our decision to use pngs, so of course, the obvious suggestion is to make a forum. 23:03, January 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh, he's trolling just as he always did in any discussion he joined so far. He prolongs discussions for no reason but to troll. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 23:09, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Stop being trolled then. It doesn't matter if it's your talk page. Removing other people's messages is prohibited unless you're an admin and the message in question is a violation to any of the policies.

I know ST usually trolls, but I didn't see it as trolling this time. 23:14, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Enough
My edits were undoing your vandalism, because you were clearly warned about it and persisted. 23:12, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Block
You were blocked for a misunderstanding, hence I unblocked you. Some users still wants to block you, though.


 * Thank you, yeah I offered them to do so. But I won't participate that nor any discussion nor this wiki any further than adding interlanguage links to this wiki's articles targeting the German and any other language version, if I'm allowed to go on editing here. I'm going to test Opera Browser on my mobile to do that while being outside of my wlan as that app can be asked not to load any images at all. And if not, oh well... This wiki hasn't been good for my mood anyways then.
 * If wished, you or any administrator, vstf member, helper or staff may reestablish the original ban until the week is over. After the ban is over, I'm going to merge the User talk page archive into this page, and put back the still missing troll comment myself as last actions.
 * P.S.: The reason I added the ban template to Coffee Shop Corporate Raider's user profile has a simple reason: He overused his rollback rights undoing my reply to Galaxy9000. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 02:25, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

I wish you would understand that it's nothing personal, but removing talk page messages was decided to not be allowed, due to the preserving of the history. You were insulting in your edit summaries, and your disregard for the rules couldn't be tolerated.

As for Coffee, he definitely didn't abuse his rollback rights. He rollbacked your talk page after you undid multiple revisions (deleting of history). I don't think it was his intention to remove your one message that you left. Adding the ban template to his page was uncalled for (same to him for adding the ban template to your page so soon.) 02:34, January 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * I didn't say he abused his rights nor did I imply that it was motivated personally. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 02:38, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

"The reason I added the ban template to Coffee Shop Corporate Raider's user profile has a simple reason: He overused his rollback rights undoing my reply to Galaxy9000." Definitely sounds like you implied that to me. 02:39, January 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * See, Levi? Please reestablish the original ban. Thanks. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 02:40, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

??? See what? You definitely implied it with the statement. You don't need to be banned, you didn't do anything extremely ban worthy, like I said. 02:44, January 29, 2013 (UTC)