User blog comment:AnonymousAnomani/Any wikia admins are considered biased towards any and all wiki users and will not hesitate to write off anything deemed speculation./@comment-53539-20180510174644

Speculation should never be allowed on pages unless characters within One Piece have stated it.

So no matter what, the admins shouldn't be allowing it.

And if they are, I disprove; note I am one of this wikias founders.

Edit: In short, I expect certain things to be carried out, if people were not I would be the first to complain. You have the ability to question and raise points if anything sounds speculative, do so. The wiki is founded souly on facts and fact finding, anything else goes against its core principle. I would be one of the first to kick up a stink, as though I was never the best wiki editing here, I still believe this is the foundation of this wiki. If the admins and other staff do not follow the intentions of its founders, then its founders have every right to speak up. It lives in light of our legacy, it was our salvation when wikipedians were being jerks to the One Piece fans at the Wikipedia pages. IT gave us the freedom to do things Wikipedia prevented us from doing. Every editor who has come after us, continues to shape our original goals.

I do expect *some* things to change, like I protested as hell against videos and stand by you don't need any of them. I had my reasons, yet still they got let in. But these videos don't impact the core traits that the founders such as myself established, therefore despite my protests I would not push to get them removed by force. That's because despite being a founder, this was *not* one of our core foundations and still complies with those we did establish the wikia on.

grasp

Okay that's enough.

Edit: One Piece Wiki:Speculations