Talk:Pet

Delete
This is completely subjective with a number of those characters listed as "pets" not being pets or are just used for traveling purposes. SeaTerror (talk) 05:37, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

The number is based on those included in the Category:Pets (and it's non canon sub category) so if there is an issue with the characters it should be discussed there. I am closing this discussion before it starts so it might start in the proper talk page. Rhavkin (talk) 05:54, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

Nope it goes here. This is the proper page. SeaTerror (talk) 17:52, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

Then you need a better reason then the characters because the gallery and navibox are based on the category, and all of those have their own talk pages. Do you have a reason to remove the page itself?. Rhavkin (talk) 18:12, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

The page was built with the Pet category in mind. I literally made the gallery while looking over Category:Pets.

If anything, complain about the category page. Pets are a widespread concept/occupation in One Piece and worth of note since lots of crews and organizations feature pets, to the point the World Government treats it as an official position in a pirate crew. KingCannon (talk) 18:14, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

The page itself needs to go because there isn't enough content other than the gallery which has characters in it that shouldn't be in it too. Also that's your own assumption about the World Government treating it as an official position. SeaTerror (talk) 18:49, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

It has as much content as Combatant, if not more. Why don't you try deleting that page?

And there's no assumption. Chopper being considered a pet is the reason used to justify his low bounty. The term "pet" is directly utilized in the work.

Maybe some of the characters in the gallery aren't pets, but the vast majority are. The page itself has merit due to the position of "pet" in a pirate crew being acknowledged in-universe.KingCannon (talk) 19:06, July 25, 2020 (UTC)