File talk:Gaburu Manga Infobox.png

Good image vs bad image
Why do you want white spots and a super-bright flag?

Sewil's. 18:39, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, the minor details that can cause an edit war... 18:58, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Though just to say, the contrast on Galaxy's image is...really bad. I doubt Viz's scans are exactly like the page, and this is proof. 19:07, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

It's exactly like the magazine. Non-doctored > Doctored. 19:16, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

What exactly makes you so sure that it's exactly like the magazine? 19:24, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

I don't need to be sure. You're being ignorant. They've advertised it as being directly from the magazine. It is exactly what you would see on paper when you bought it. 19:17, March 30, 2013 (UTC)

...So you just believe what the advertisements say, even without proof? Okay then. The other scan still looks better and is probably more true to the paper. The Viz scan has too high of a contrast. 21:55, March 30, 2013 (UTC)

I thought we said not to use Viz images in the forum vote anyway. SeaTerror (talk) 01:08, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

It's not doctored, it's cleaned, if you hate cleaned images so much, would you rather use the shitty raws and not let them get cleaned because they are "directly from the magazine"?

Too bad Nada. If the original looks like that, then it's edited. The raws are not directly from the magazine, those are from crap scanners. The viz one is the closest to the original we have, and therefore oda's original drawing. The mangastream one is way too dark. ST, that's only if it has english on it. 01:24, March 31, 2013 (UTC)