User talk:Sewil

Welcome!
Yeah, welcome!

It seems you are not new to wiki's in general, but still: If you need help with something, feel free to ask :).

Have a nice stay! 20:54, July 16, 2011 (UTC)

Signature
I will simply copy the instruction of a fellow editor, JapaneseOpfan: 

And if you are lazy, there is an editor who creates signatures for others, Roranoa Zoro:

http://onepiece.wikia.com/index.php?title=Forum:Smart_sig!!&t=20110702145929

Good luck :) 23:05, July 16, 2011 (UTC)

In your preferences put in the signature

Now it should works. The signature is in /sig2, so if you want to change it just made a new page and change the page in /sig, this will avoid changing all the old signatures. Be careful to not add new empty lines in the sig, otherwise the sig will be on more than one line. For changing the date format, see this page. Now you will have to sign with only 3 tildes not 4 ( ~ ) otherwise the date will be displayed 2 times. You can read my discussion with ricizubi, there can be other advices.

Haha
Hey..if you are a fan of making fancy sigs..you can add some over here...XD:)--

Dude Whats Your Problem Why are you deleting My posted/Uploaded pics in this Wikia &lt;font red=&quot;red&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt; 17:34, September 14, 2011 (UTC)  Gr  an  it    Hy  saj   

Then Don't You Ever do that Again, and yes this is my sig.:&#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Granit Hysaj}} 17:52, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

I Want To HELP THIS WIKIA With my contributions, i can Upload my own pics,No one needs to DELETE Them AND DONT SREW AROUND DUDE.&#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Granit Hysaj}} 18:18, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

Trivia Deletion
I wanted to know why you deleted what I wrote in the trivia section in episode 517. I only wrote that this is the first episode in the second half of the series. It's not a spoiler, especially when in the episode before, it says that it's the last episode in the first half of the series, so it's obvious that this episode is the first in the second half. So why delete it? --Strawhat1 16:50, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I said, there is absolutely no need to fill in any information what so ever, before the episode has actually been released. The page that is made for now is only created to make things easier for people to add information when the page is released.

re:why did u revert
We've decided long ago no gifs. 01:41, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Gifs
Hi there, you had been uploading quite a lot of gifs lately. I just want you to know that "Gifs will only be made in the situation when neither the anime nor manga are able to fully illustrate the technique or power, or an animated image is beneficial and can supplement the written description." Some of your gifs weren't quite necessary. So if either the manga or anime is able to show the technique clearly, could you not upload a gif of the technique? Thanks. 01:40, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oh I didn't know that, but you gotta admit that gifs look much cooler. Anyway, for Hakikane.gif, you need to see that his forehead turns black, you can't see that in the final punch, for Redhawk.gif, you can't view the full technique in one image, as the ignition is part of the technique as well. And as for Crossingofsixpaths.gif, seeing the actual slicing effect and the after-effect cant be viewed in one image. Although Tatsumaki.gif might not be needed. Sometimes .gif's just look better than still images. For example, when illustrating the gatling, you CAN illustrate it in one image, but illustrating it in an animated .gif gives more effect.

If you want to discuss the gif's, please refer to this forum. Seriously, you've made quite an overhaul and while I love gif's, there's always such a thing as too much. 02:09, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for telling me. I'll check the forum out. The Tatsumaki.gif will be deleted when the admins wake up.

Fansubs
Could you please give your input on the http://onepiece.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Fansub_Page?t=20121003201403 forum. It would be greatly appreciated. 20:54, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Prev/Next in Arc Boxes
Hello,

I saw you changed the general presentation of the prev/next links in arc boxes. I really don't agree with your changes. Here are my problems (I give only one example per issue, but of course I disagree with all changes similar to those): Overall, I strongly disagree with your changes. I would appreciate that you enlighten me about their interest or revert them. (I'm not questioning your improvement of the template, though.) Thanks!
 * 1) Why removing the previous anime arc? It is far better to have one line for prev/next in canon, and another for prev/next in anime. The fact that the previous arc is the same on two lines is not a problem. Removing it does not improve clarity, it is rather the contrary to me.
 * 2) I don't get this at all. The SH's separation serial was meant to be seen as an anime arc here, cause it's the arc that comes before the Marineford Arc in the anime. You seem to have replaced that information by the previous and next mini-arcs in the manga, which is totally different, and makes no real sense (mini-arcs are parallel to manga arcs, they are not sequenced).
 * 3) This is incorrect to me. This is a mini-arc box, not an arc box, so the plain prev/next should be only mini arcs. Thing is, some mini-arcs are also anime arcs, so there's also the anime chronology here—but it's kinda secondary. Using only "prev/next" to refer to anime arcs is really ambiguous.
 * 4) Finally, mixing different types of changes you did, we get this. It seems the previous anime arc was the Arlong one, while it was actually the Buggy mini-arc. There's info about mini-arcs, but one doesn't know how it is related to the arc in question ("next mini-arc"? but the Loguetown Arc is not a mini-arc…).

Hello sff9. |prev anime = Straw Hat Separation 2 |next      = Post-War Arc
 * 1) What the Next/previous anime arc labels indicates is that the next/previous arc of episodes aren't in the manga, but only in the anime. What the Next/previous arc labels indicate is that the next/previous arc is both in the manga and the anime. We have the technology to merge them together to one, so why not do that? Writing the same arc twice in the same template is not only unnecessary, it is also quite confusing for the users who navigate through the arcs, thinking it might be a special or something of the same arc.
 * 2) That was a mistake by me, I didn't know that manga had it set up that way. I thought they had it set up the anime had it, which was splitting it up in 2 pieces. It's supposed to be
 * 1) Hm.. your right about that, I'll make it so that it says next anime arc instead then, since there are anime chronology in some mini arcs.

Finally, while I do agree that some of this might seem rather chaotic, I'm trying to improve it as we speak. Instead of having 3 different rows I'm going to make is so that if one row misses one label, and the row below only have one label, it will push that label up so that instead of having two rows with single labels it will have one row with two different labels. Also, I'm going to remove the links to next/previous mini arcs if they arn't connected to the anime, or if only one of them are following the line, like in the Amazon Lily arc, where it connects to the CP9's Independent Report, just because the next mini arc is the Straw Hat Separation serial. That was rather stupid of me.

Hope to hear back from you!

Hi! So, basically, I think the only aspect we are still disagreeing upon is the repetition of previous or next arcs when they are the same for manga and anime, right? Actually, there's obviously no real "problem"—all the information is in there in both our versions, and anyone can figure it out. But I find it clearer to have one row for navigation through canon arcs, and another for navigation through anime arcs. If you really think it's better to avoid repeating information (which I don't like too, but find less important), then I think the best presentation would be to have one centered row for the unique prev/next arc, and two rows for the others, kind of like this:

Also, about the compressing of two rows in one, I'm afraid it's going to be confusing. Personally, I expect prevs/nexts in a single row to be of the same "nature", and would be quite disturbed if it were not always the case. Anyway, even if I'm not convinced by all your changes, good work with the template and doc!

Actually, how you displayed it there was how I did it the first time before adding the mini arc as its own row. I could always revert back to that edit. Plus, not so much code is needed for that version either.

Was it? I thought it was more like but whatever. Gonna take a closer look to your final version tomorrow.

Arc Start
If you take a look at Template:Punk Hazard Arc you'll see that 654 is on that arcs navigation template. Since 574 will correspond with that chapter, it has to go on the Punk Hazard Arc. 21:28, November 10, 2012 (UTC)

The episode has not been released nor has the title. How can you possibly know it will be on Punk Hazard?

It's not the fact that it will be on PH, it's the fact that it is likely to correspond with the GAM chapter (on the scan that announced the filler arc, the panel from the GAM chapter was shown at the end. Anyways, if you really must, just change 654 to the Fishman Island Arc, and your arc box will work perfectly. 21:33, November 10, 2012 (UTC)

It's not that, I mean the manga and anime are not always parallel. Maybe they will input some fillers until episode 577? I don't think they will have one episode of punk hazard just to follow up with 2 filler episodes. Makes no sense.

This is Toei we're talking about here. They interrupted Impel Down after 3 episodes to add the Little East Blue Arc filler. Also, the Z's ambition arc is more likely to be through all of December, according to the scan, it's just the titles haven't been released yet. 21:36, November 10, 2012 (UTC)

If they do not have any name for the episode yet, then please refrain from making the article. Wait until we get the name, and then make the article. Thanks. 21:37, November 10, 2012 (UTC)

Long Ring Long Land Arc
Hey, I noticed you renamed the Davy Back Fight arc. Would you be able to go though http://onepiece.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Davy+Back+Fight+Arc&namespace= and changed all the links to Long Ring Long Land Arc? If you don't want to do it, I'll eventually get to it. 02:38, November 12, 2012 (UTC)

Sure. I can do that.

Re:Raw
I follow the 2chan thread as the episode is aired.

http://dec.2chan.net/18/res/19249914.htm

01:01, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

Ahhh, thanks.

Anime Team
Why'd you leave? 20:52, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

Being in the team with points and stuff just feels like a constant competition agains other team members. I'd rather edit freely and in my own pace.

The group ranking board was just a huge chat joke, but whatever. 22:43, November 18, 2012 (UTC)

I'll still improve images and such by looking at the team page and see which articles to be improved, but I'd rather not be in the team.

eh
http://onepiece.wikia.com/wiki/One_Piece_Music?diff=783211&oldid=783210 Any reason for undoing my edit? Just wondering. --( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 04:20, November 25, 2012 (UTC)

You don't add an ending episode if the we don't know when it's going to end. It's probably going to continue through 575 also. Just look at Episode Guide.

No I mean removing the brackets around "One Piece". ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 04:35, November 25, 2012 (UTC)

That wasn't me.

Boolean tests in templates
 What are you talking about? It seems to work well: User:Sff9/Sandbox4.

Nope. It didn't work well. I checked with the arcs and it didn't span the rows when using your version. I fixed it anyway.

Yeah, I screwed up, but not because of Boolean conditions not working—fortunately they do! Anyway, your version still does not work when there are no anime arcs. My last one should be OK: Whiskey Peak Arc, Reverse Mountain Arc, Orange Town Arc.

What was wrong in the first place?

The bottom line of the frame wasn't shown when there was only one row of prev/next. It was because of the rowspan=3, which mustn't be used in this case. Check it there: User:Sff9/Sandbox2.

Oh, BTW, do you know about the "switch" function? I have the feeling it could make some of your coding a bit easier.

So I compared them here and there's no visual difference. The only difference is invisible in the code. And yes I do know of the switch function but I do not feel that it is a necessity in the template.

Well the difference is visible in my browser… Whatever. Problem solved anyway.

Confusion
I don't understand why episode 574 is counted as the Fishman Island arc when everything that happens in it is during chapter 654 which is during the Punk Hazard arc.Frozenstein (talk) 15:41, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Read the talk page.

I did and it still isn't cannoically proper, read the manga or look at the chapters listed in the Punk Hazard arc, cannonically it is this arc not the Fishman Island arc so it's a huge inconsistency and also a flaw.Frozenstein (talk) 03:08, November 27, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, 5th time now, TAKE IT IN THE TALK PAGE. Why are you still taking this discussion with me? Are you feeling alright? Stop changing things that have been discussed and try to win your argument. Good luck.

Special Edition Eyecatchers
What is the Special Edition Eyecatchers? Strawhat1 (talk) 04:50, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

They are from the remasters of One Piece which is an upscale to 16:9 720p resolution. They are released every saturday and currently there are 34 episodes released. Since they have the ratio 16:9 Toei animation had to cut off the top and bottom parts which made it a 4:3 ratio, and then upscale it, since they don't wanna stretch the image.

Replacing Episode Images with PNG
Is it really necessary to replace the episode images with png? At the end, the images will all be displayed at a fixed width in their respecting episode article and won't take fully advantage of the PNG format. There is no additional benefit we could get from all this process. MasterDeva (talk) 04:00, December 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes there is. When the JPG is shrinked it will get pixelated, the PNG does not get pixelated by shrinking it. It's as simple as that. For every image I've replaced I've always compared it with the former and always seen an improvement. Currently every image except for 3-8 is a .png. I'm thinking of replacing 3-8 with the latest episode specials so that it gets to a 16:9 ratio like the latest 720p episodes.


 * What I meant was that we may have to change the width of the images to fit them in the text such is not the case with episode images. They are placed on a fixed width (380px) and will stay that way afterwards. Alas if you are willing to go through them then be my guest. I would urge you though to properly copy the source code from the JPG version and paste it on the PNG. I've noticed that issue on several images you've replaced. So please take notice. MasterDeva (talk) 05:03, December 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * I've already gone through them all. As long as the images I replace are either the ratio of 4:3 for SD or 16:9 for HD it's not a problem to replace the collages to .png. I didn't even recap most of them. The wikia has a problem in shrinking .jpg images, as it's pixelating them, shouldn't happen normally, but it does.


 * Make sure in the future to properly copy and paste the source code from the JPG files to the PNG ones. Other than that thank you for your work and take care. ^_^ MasterDeva (talk) 06:30, December 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * Alright, and thank you.

Chat
Come into chat. 20:12, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

One Piece Special Edition - Eyecatche
Can you please tell me what is the One Piece Special Edition? You add some photos of eyecatchers from the One Piece Special Edition, and I what to add an explanation to them but I can't because I don't know what is the Special Edition, so if you can, please tell me. 79.181.240.98 19:22, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

They are upscaled and cropped remasters of the old 4:3 (NTSC) episodes (1-206) to 16:9 (HDTV) which are aired every Saturday at 9AM (+9). Currently there are 38 episodes released.

Re:Image
I didn't. The raws I have are like that already. 02:07, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Quality is the same, but yeah, there's a tiny black border. 02:27, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Episode stuff
Need any help doing that? 19:33, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

I guess. You could start by removing the categories from the episodes that are listed under E. The template will put them under their corresponding episode number. I'm working on that right now. Other than that, the episodes that in the season categories aren't listed with a number should also have their categories removed, it's a lot of stuff to fix :P.

Listed under E? 19:39, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

In Category:Episodes they are sorted under letters and numbers, but I removed the ones who were sorted under the letter E (If you don't type a number when you add your category, like, it will just take the first letter of the name of the article, which is E (Episode)).

I see. So, if they are already gone, then there's nothing else? 19:46, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

Well there are all the Season categories.

K. Check how I did it on the first 3 episodes. Confirm if that's right, and I'll do them all. 19:51, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

There's no need to do it if they already have the correct categorization. Will just be a waste of energy. For the episodes that only don't have the, for example, 003, in the category, will be sorted incorrectly and can be removed. The easiest way to check is to go through the Category:Seasons and check if they are listed under a letter or a number.

None of them are under a letter there..

Wouldn't really be a waste of energy though, because leaving it in if it's automated is bad coding. 19:57, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

Lol it's a lot of episodes to go through but if you really feel like going through them all be my guest. I just added this to the template for consistency for future episodes.

Consider it done. 20:00, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

Can you guys use a bot when you do these kind of jobs? You literally flooded Special:RecentChanges, now it's hard to keep track of new contributions. You also increase the chance of vandalism being buried in the last changes, this is why we use bots. Pleas either ask sff9 or make one of your own next time.


 * Btw, for the sorting problem I believe you could have simply resolved by adding a to the episode template.

Well... this works too ^^

Sewil. Use minor edits and it won't show up there. That's what I do. 06:10, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Vandals don't do minor edits. Bots can only do minor edits, so the activity floods either way. People need to disable minor edits. 06:15, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

And it still doesn't matter, because bot edits are minor. 06:19, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Yep. Same to you. Gonna probably do that pirate category now though. 06:51, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Of course it's possible, but I'm like super busy right now, sorry… If you're not in a hurry I'll try to do it next week… (Also Gal, bot edits are not minor, they're simply flagged as "bot".)

Images
Raw isn't out yet. How'd you get them? 07:37, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Some guy sent a mediafire link on 2chan with each frame from the episode.

Image categories
Ideally it should be all 4 of them. The current state of the categories is a mess, so it's surely not always possible, but we're gonna succeed eventually! Your edit seems perfect, that's the general idea.

It may be obscurely said, but that's what I meant though: a pic must be in one subcat of each of the 4.

Doesn't Exist
Only in your mind does that "pointless" space actually exist. There is no point in keeping the episode title combined with the coding of the infobox. This was one of the changes we had changed to when redoing episode formats. SeaTerror (talk) 23:26, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

You mean something that is incredibly minor? I assumed you were talking about something that required the {-} template. Not to mention I looked in both monobook and new wikia look and did not see that so called space on any released episodes. Oh I see it now. It only appears when an episode does not have an image in it which is only the unreleased episodes. In fact your way is worst because it makes the infobox go into the short summary section. I missed your other messge. You're completely wrong about the episodes not having the space. Every single episode has it because of the new episode format we went with. SeaTerror (talk) 23:41, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

The only episodes that did not have the space were newer ones which I had changed to go back to the format that we were using. The "space" isn't much of a space at all. Every episode before those episodes had the space. SeaTerror (talk) 00:32, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Nobody at all will think that there is anything wrong with the template. It looks fine and does not look "ugly" one bit. The space has been there for months and nobody ever said anything about it. SeaTerror (talk) 00:50, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

SBS 68
I noticed that you were uploading the pictures for SBS Volume 68. I also noticed that there were a fair number of them that were red-linked. Were they deleted, and if so, would you like me to restore them? Or are they being replaced? Either is fine, just let me know if there's anything you need me to do. 18:48, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

Neither, I just prepared the links for them when I was typing, and they are all uploaded now.

Stop removing the spaces, it hasn't been resolved and kinda spamming the RC with your edits. 00:43, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

It's not against the rules so I'm not disallowed to do it as SeaTerror can't come up with any reasons. Also, turn off minor edits if you don't want it to be flooded.

Episode "design flaw" edits
Stop frickin changing it while the discussion is still ongoing. 00:45, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

The discussion was resolved a long time ago, ST is just stalling and can't come up with any good reasons, read it through yourself.

The discussion is far from resolved, so just stop for now. 00:49, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Maybe in your head it isn't but if you would look at any debate against a monkey who just keep on saying the same sentence and has no valid arguments you could say it's resolved.

No it hasn't. So far only you and Galaxy want to remove the space in the discussion. Go to the discussion, I gave my reason. Well I can't turn off the minor edits because I pretty much only use the "Recent Wiki Activity" page and it doesn't allow you to. 00:50, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Sanji
.

05:45, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

Ref Pirates
Hey Sewil, welcome to the Reference Pirates! You can start whenever you want, but notice that if there isn't 1 job per month done, there'll be a consideration in excommunication. Recommended is reading the rules and if you have questions, just ask them :P. Happy editing. 15:23, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Image Source Format
Could you please be consistent with the source format in use for images? MasterDeva (talk) 06:54, February 7, 2013 (UTC)


 * What do you mean? I always use the same format.


 * The source format we use is this:


 * Where the source on top is the for the image currently in use. The asterisk can be omitted if there is only one source. MasterDeva (talk) 07:02, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

11SN Portraits
Rergardless of your opinion on the matter, the wikia has decided to use pre-skip portraits on the Supernovas page, since we consider people to be Supernovas only before the skip. So please do not replace and mark for deletion all the 11SN portraits. And if you disagree, don't complain to me about it, do it on the proper talk/forum/whatever. 15:05, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry
Ohh I'm so sorry....I wanted to remove my vote because i voted many times and I apperently removed yours but really I didn't intent to.My pc crashed while I was editing the poll so I accidentally deleted yours instead.I'm deeply sorry.. 14:57, February 21, 2013 (UTC)

Why did you undo my categorization on Luigia and Mendo
Yo Sewil, it's WU barging into the house on a whim! I have seen that you have reverted my non-canon categorization on the following characters; Luigia and Mendo. Why did you do that? I just want an explaination because you didn't give me one when you undid me, that's all. No explaination and the user who got reverted doesn't know why, and can't learn anything from it, so please give me one or i will change it back. Just a warning bro, nothing else ◉︵◉ Wish you'll have a still great day, and I'll see ya later. WU barges out of the house again for no proper reason, and doesn't leave a sign that he ever was there at all (☄ฺ◣д◢)☄ - 17:37, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

Kay, I see. I am really an idiot, sorry for interrupting whatever you happened to do when I said the message :P Another question; do you have a clue when the whole "Community Anime Night" starts? WU the total BAKA rides his total BAKA horse into the dawn - 19:20, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

Hey man just dropping bye to ask u why you put down Zo as the name of the when it's written as Zou ?

Please write Back i would like to have a conversation on this topic of disscusion, Captainwinslow10 (talk) 23:09, February 27, 2013 (UTC) Captainwinslow10

Title Cards
Let me just say thanks for updating all those episode images with title cards, with no fansubs either! Nice, dunno where you found files without fansubbed title cards, but thanks for your hard work! 03:44, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Episode Images
Why did you change the images of every episode? It was fine the way it was! 05:12, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Never mind, I foud out why. 05:21, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Raw episodes
Hi sewil, I heard you have all the episode raws, is it true? I'm interested in the first 300 episodes, since K-F uses hard subs. Do you know where I can find them?

Signing posts
oh god, im so stupid :o i thought it was only 3 tides. sorry about that

it works now :D Shokoluffy 21:01, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

Redirecting categories
I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve by redirecting non-empty categories. It does not automatically put all pages in the redirected category. Maybe there's something I don't understand? Anyway, if you really want to remove a category and put all of its content in another, just ask me to do it, it's fairly easy with PX-Bot.

Now, about it is not redundant since it adds information. Category:Cover Story Images are all images from cover stories, including appearance and infobox images for example. describes both the source and the use of the pics. However, while it is not redundant, it may be considered as useless. If you really think so, and want to remove it yourself, then make sure all pics are put both in Category:Cover Story Images and in Category:Plot Images, otherwise some info will be lost in the process.

Yup, I see your point. I too don't think there is much to say for this category's defense. I'll remove it. (About redirecting categories, it is not supposed to work as you thought, and the theory was confirmed experimentally with the few categories you once redirected.)

Re:Logic
I know, but if the Straw hats are automatically featured, then I don't want to have to post there again. It's laziness for the future, not a lack of logic.

Also, I noticed your Deletion button-thingy and I'm interested in it. Does it work, and would you mind if I copied it for my own use? Thanks. 19:00, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

I've just tried out your deletion button, and it works great! Thanks! Also, do you think it could be possible to make a similar thing that add IGR to usertalks (In the proper Username ~ format, of course)? Because that would be totally awesome. Thanks. 14:05, March 24, 2013 (UTC)

Hey, can you change the delete button so that it blanks the image's page before it adds the deletion template? 04:36, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

"You can only vote once and you can not vote on your own nomination."
Just to say, you might wanna change your vote in the Featured Article polls, since you're not supposed to vote for your own. 19:26, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Is it? Could have sworn it was an actual rule...seems reasonable, since it's unfair to vote for your own nomination. I'll bring it up later. 20:48, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

It was at the beginning. SeaTerror (talk) 05:12, March 30, 2013 (UTC)

Sabo
http://puu.sh/2rF9h

Unfortunately, this blog was deleted without reason. I urge you, kind sir or madame, to petition the administrator in order to have the blog restored to its original state.

Sincerely - 11:02, April 1, 2013 (UTC)