File talk:Sengoku Admiral Portrait.png

Conflict
The non-frontal image may not be the best portrait, but it's still more current then the pre timeskip image. Portraits have to be up to date. 09:44, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

Just wait till we get an actual post timeskip portrait. 09:59, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

No need. The side view one is the best available at this time. It is an actual post timeskip portrait, so it must be used. 10:03, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

No, that is not a portrait. 14:12, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

It is until a better one is found. It is more up to date then the other one. 16:31, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

I can't see his face. 16:38, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. It's the best available post timeskip pic (and even Klobis's is better). We have to update the portrait one way or another. 17:01, June 23, 2013 (UTC)

We have to update the portrait when we can have an actual portrait. 17:09, June 23, 2013 (UTC)

It IS an actual portrait. It still is more recent then the old one, so it has to be used. 17:17, June 23, 2013 (UTC)

Bump. The appearance is not up to date. 13:40, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Unless the portrait isn't frontal or at very least 3/4 frontal we'll keep the current one until a better image appears. MasterDeva (talk) 18:06, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

I don't see why we should wait though. It's not the perfect portrait, but the other one isn't even current. 18:08, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Ahem. MasterDeva (talk) 21:32, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, if this was still pre timeskip, that would matter, but it isn't.. 17:58, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Rules > Latest appearance. We're not using 50% of his face because it's latest.

Correct image > rule that seems to only apply to other portraits. Situations like this are exceptions. 04:57, July 6, 2013 (UTC)

There is already a General Inspector portrait that makes mandatory use of it. That would be an exception, this one isn't. MasterDeva (talk) 11:02, July 8, 2013 (UTC)