File talk:SMILE Factory Underling 1 Portrait.png

"Sanshita"
According to CCC's script his name is Sanshita, but according to some dictionaries Sanshita can also mean underling. What should we do? Should we delete the page or should we keep it? 22:28, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

I'm ok with deleting it. 22:35, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

But why would the dwarves call him underling? Isn't it kind of an offending word? Why would he allow the slaves to call him that? For me it makes more sense that it's his name. After all Oda is known to troll like that with names.

well just that "Sanshita" is wrote in kanji and not katakana should make we doubtfull about it. there're only two cases of kanji-named charas in one piece (sentomaru and kin'emon) 23:17, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

When I created the page, I didn't know about the connotations of his "name". I have done a bit of research, used a number of online translators, and looked at other translations of the chapter. The kanji for 'underling' is slightly different then this, but one of the online translators identified it as the same (using the katakana). About half of the online translators translated it as 'Mr. Sanshita' and the other half were 'underling'. The translation of the chapter I read first, Mangastream, said 'Sanshita'. The Mangapanda and some spanish site translations were 'underling'. Though I originally wanted the page to stay, after my research, I believe the best idea is to archive the page in my user page and wait until a chapter or databook that identifies the name properly. Montblanc Noland (talk) 23:20, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

I suggest to keep even the portrait - as for the gambler lackey - due to his slitterly-above-other-minor-charas importance and rename it as "Donquixote_Pirates_Factory_Underling.png" 23:26, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

So can I delete it now? 23:34, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

It's not like it'll take long to remake if the name is confirmed. Go for it DP. 23:51, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

The portrait is still a candidate for deletion. I agree with Rayleigh92 that we should keep and rename it. Montblanc Noland (talk) 10:37, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

I'll rename it if you link it. 15:38, February 20, 2014 (UTC)