Talk:Enia

Are you sure he deserves an article? --Admiral Sugar (talk) 15:50, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Purpose
This article shouldn't be deleted. It has as much relevancy as Hera, and he has a page. His name patch may not have the number on it, but that could be an anime error. Montblanc Noland (talk) 15:57, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

But wasn't hera spotted In a block In the manga? --Admiral Sugar (talk) 15:59, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Or it could not be a name. It's speculation to say that it is. "Could be" = speculation. 16:02, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

It doesn't have as much relevancy though does It? It was explained on Hera's talk page Talk:Hera that he In group 6 Hera has a number in the manga as least we get that much Information --Admiral Sugar (talk) 16:07, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

I agree that "could be" is speculation. The letter font and color is the same on Enia's patch as Hera's. It is similar enough that it is a name. Montblanc Noland (talk) 16:11, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

The anime has never been known to pay attention to detail like that, so a lot of text looks the same most of the time. This page should go. 16:34, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Well, the names of Lucy, Dagama and Sai had the same font color too. 16:41, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Then where's his number? 23:47, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

There was no number in the episode. Even though there is no number, the shape and size of the patch and the color and font of the lettering are the same as the patches found on Lucy, Hera, Dagama, and Sai. You said the anime doesn't pay attention to detail like the color of the patch, but they might not pay enough detail to give a non - canon gladiator a number. Montblanc Noland (talk) 00:41, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

You're taking what I said and blowing it out of proportion so your ridiculous argument sounds plausible. We see words on t-shirts in the series all the time. If we thought everyone of them were a name, we'd have dozens of random articles about people whose names come from t-shirt slogans. The animators may be lazy, but they aren't stupid. 04:49, February 20, 2014 (UTC)