Talk:Liar Noland

King Merger
Not happy with how that was done, I do remember seeing it but now I've seen the result myself after my departure for a while, I can say now after seeing it that its not worked out so well. The page isn't about the King, this is where the merger has gone wrong, its focus is the book, not the characters inside. The haracters are handled by their respect pages, and honestly... The King's page when he ha one should have just been deleted and not marged with this page. Merging it results in someone just lazily C + P-ing that pages text onto this one without adapting this page to suit it. Still, its been sorted an the page is back to focusing on the bok itself.

I will note, as the one who set it up, it was intentionally set up to list the contents of the book first and the information on the truth second. There was a reason for this, but I doubt anyone will see what the point was, so I'm not going to detail it. Regardless of what happened anyway, the page is back to being in order and I know someone will likely complain about the King's personnel profile (well, it wasn't quite that but you know what I mean...) being removed, but you know what... When someone looks at this page their not here to read about a King we don't know the name of, their here to read about the book mentioned in the storyline. :-/One-Winged Hawk 11:07, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

Book name
Isn't the book name just "Liar Noland"? How did "King of..." get added to the front? It's not "Usotsuki O no Norando". 21:37, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Right, "king" is unnecessary. --Klobis (talk) 00:25, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

I think we have Funimation to thank for that little bit of mistranslation. 14:18, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Shall we move it then? 04:30, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Image names
I know this should be raised on each page, but since there's a lot of these images and they all have the same issue, I'll say it here instead. I think the images should be renamed to something that makes a lot more sense than "KolT2" or what have you. Does anybody disagree, or should I just go ahead and change them?

19:47, June 12, 2014 (UTC)