Template talk:Haki Users Navibox

Marine Vice Admirals
It's way past time this was sorted out. A month ago, there was an edit war primarily between Klobis and SeaTerror over whether Marines ranked vice admiral and above (who have been said as a class as all being to use haki, but have not individually been seen using it) belong in this navibox. Yata locked the page and asked them to sort it out, and surprise surprise they didn't.

When I created this navibox, I did include them, mainly to avoid the inevitable edit war with ST if I didn't (given his past edits to the main Haki page). I'm on the fence about whether or not they should be included - there's arguments both ways - so I just want to know if we can reach a consensus on what to do so this can get unlocked already. 14:02, December 2, 2013 (UTC)

There is not "Unknown type Haki" so they should not be included. And ST deleted Rebecca. We must revert it. --Klobis (talk) 14:46, December 2, 2013 (UTC)

If we can't say which type they use, don't include them. However, we should link the ranks of those who are implied to use it. I'm not sure what we should do in the future if we're encountered with a "____ can use Haki" quote that doesn't specify type though... Perhaps we just rename that section of the box "Unspecified Type"? 15:13, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

All vice admirals were said to have Haki so they have to be included on the template. SeaTerror (talk) 00:28, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

Just put a link to Vice Admirals in the template. We don't need to list them all. 02:41, December 6, 2013 (UTC)

I support ST here. 05:24, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Need more input on this page, since there's no clear majority. I still stand by my prior point that we shouldn't list all of the vice admirals. 05:28, December 15, 2013 (UTC)