Talk:Louis Arnote

Race
How do we know he's a human? --Meganoide (talk) 20:34, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

No evidence to suggest he isn't. 20:37, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Until we get literally anything to suggest that he wasn't human, he may as well be human. It really doesn't matter.

20:44, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Considering him human is nothing but speculation. --Meganoide (talk) 23:21, March 29, 2015 (UTC)

Link your evidence or consider this discussion closed. 23:56, March 29, 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, no evidence for a citation, so it's been removed. No other mentioned character is "presumed human until proven otherwise". 14:14, March 30, 2015 (UTC)

BTW I find annoying that everytime I underline a mistake there is always someone who is against me. And often an admin comes and notices I'm right, so I'm starting to think they are against me even when it's clear I'm right. People consider me a vandal. No other possibilities about being against my obvious sentences. --Meganoide (talk) 19:56, March 30, 2015 (UTC)

If someone has an opinion someone else will have an opposing opinion. That's how people are.

19:59, March 30, 2015 (UTC)

I'm referring to nonsense answers to my logic questions. I.E. we don't have any clue he's human. That's a fact. But people say that I must demonstrate that he is not a human. One world: absurde. --Meganoide (talk) 20:08, March 30, 2015 (UTC)

In this case, I actually do think you guys are being unreasonable, which is why I just stepped in and made the edit, and closed the discussion. This one should have been open-and-shut and really could have been made by just making an edit, but you guys felt the need to overlook our standards for other pages just to argue with Meganoide. This is the kind of case that should not be opinion-based, but instead come from looking at our own standards. 20:59, March 30, 2015 (UTC)