Forum talk:Community Café

We have a place to talk on less then serious stuff... I hope this works out alright and doesn't cause us too many problems. One-Winged Hawk 08:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I just want to say while this place is quiet, its much nicer then Wikipedia right now. There are too many people beginning to get snobby about things, plus every time we do something we get the 'general anime' rules shoved down our throats and are told 'you can't do it that way!'. I hope it stays that way even when we get more people in. :D One-Winged Hawk 22:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * It is way to quiet though. I have plenty of time so I've been working on many articles, most notably The Going Merry. I've been adding redirects like crazy. I am surprised noone thought to redirect Luffy to the proper article, Monkey D. Luffy. We should probably start with early episodes, and create a baseline starting from the Captain Morgan Arc, and work our way up, and add pages as it goes along. So when we get to Captain Kuro's arc, we'll add the Usopp article, and if there arleady is one, improve upon it greatly. But's thats just my 2 Belly!Cody2526 00:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Some of the characters mentioned though... I have no clue as to who the hell they are.  Some of these characters are going to be rather small, like 4 sentances.  :One-Winged Hawk 07:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * FOr minor characters, we'll probably merge them into the proper Arc page. So someone who's name was mentioned, and they were shown, but not important to the story too much, would probably go on the page for the arc they were in. But in the case of an Organization, such as Baroque Works, they'd go there. IF any characters ar emajor, but belong on that page, like Rob Lucci belongs to CP9, we can link there with a short description. Whats really bothering me though, is havng STatistics in the article. THey should be on the sid eunder the picture. I wrote a ton of stuff for the Going Merry, and someone came in, and redid the article from scratch, with less details, and putting statistics on the side. Another case was someone disagreed with the Omake intro, because they misread it, and deleted everything in the article, and rewrote the intro badly. We need to talk about this kind of stuff before we go ahead and change it. thats what talk pages are for. If you disagree with anything, bring it up there and if people agree, by all means, edit the heck out of that part. Just make it better. Cody2526 20:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think even the minor characters should have a page, a stub, because as we've seen recently with Dragon and Garp, you never know when the next piece of info will be revealled.


 * Right now, Wikipedia is buggy... I can't edit things without 50% having a problem and having to re-submit it. I give up with that place completely.  One-Winged Hawk 11:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Another thing, they complain about speculation on there, yet today I found a speculation about Dragon being one of the 4 emperors... Being a revoloutionary... I doub he i one anyway, and besides... What about their 'We're against speculations?' thing.


 * I'm against speculations myself. In a forum, they have a place, on a enclopedia, they do not, unless they are a populaur theory backed with hard evidence as to 'WHY' many consider it a possiblitly.  But only then, a few thoeires is all you need, not 30+ or some other stupid number, one or two... With GOOD proven evidence.   One-Winged Hawk 11:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * It would be so much easier to put people in the proper articles. If enough information is available for at the very least about 3 paragraphs, I'd say that warrants an Article. It's easy enough to move them when the time comes.--Cody2526 00:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)