Talk:Trap

Is this still a stub?
Currently, this page has information in all of the sections. Therefore, by definition, it isn't a stub. However, we know little to nothing about Trap and all of the info is pretty ambiguous. Should we leave the mark till all info is available or take off the mark and fill in the info later? Montblanc Noland (talk) 20:52, October 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * A stub is an article that has to be completed, not "an article with empty sections". So you cannot say that "by definition it isn't a stub". However, if you can't think of anything else to add nor of anywhere else to look for information, then it most likely isn't a stub indeed. Remove the template.


 * As of now, no one can find any more info on Trap since his special isn't available online. Would that qualify as not being able to add anything else? And thanks for a quick response. Montblanc Noland (talk) 21:40, October 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * I believe the stub template should be removed only when all the information available are given in the article and not when we cannot find them. The article lacks information that we cannot find anywhere, but it's yet to be completed. The stub template remind us of that. Ideally a non-stub article is complete, this isn't.