Talk:Kazekage

Identity
In episode 928 subtitles, 風影's name is not showed. So we can't decide who 風影 is. --Klobis (talk) 13:03, April 13, 2020 (UTC)

It is fukage also if you see this tweet you will see why he is fukage. . This oage should be deleted. 13:12, April 13, 2020 (UTC)


 * It is fukage: There is no furigana for the name. How do you know it is Fukage?
 * if you see this tweet: It is a guess by a fan. It means speculation. --Klobis (talk) 13:17, April 13, 2020 (UTC)

風影 could be Fukage or Kazekage, but we probably choose the latter because the ninjas are tributes to Naruto. A page called by kanji is really hard to search, so we should use a romanized name.--Mangautente01 (discussioni) 21:15, April 13, 2020 (UTC)

Aight, so is there a way of identifying this character? If we can't tell who it is, then this page should be deleted on account of providing no information (and the page name being in kanji).

If we can identify the character, I think we should decide on the most probable romanization and move the page to a romanized title. IMO, it's better to give the page an accessible title for searching even if it turns out to be wrong and we have to move it - of course, we should note the other potential romanizations in the article - than giving it an inaccessible title that may be technically correct, but would still be moved to the romanized spelling when we learn it. I don't think there'd be much to lose by just deciding on a romanized name, if we know who the character is. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 22:42, April 14, 2020 (UTC)

I agree with Kaido. If we can identify the character, the page should not stay in kanji. If we can't ID the character, delete the page for now. 01:13, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

I'm with Kaido and Noland. It's just ridiculous to have a Kanji article on an English website, so please find the right name, or get rid of this for now.Awareness Bringer 14:34, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

The page name should be reverted to "Fukage", and have information about the ninja from the tweet. Worst case scenario, the name and images could change. As for the why that ninja, the tweet is the only source we have, and we have nothing contradicting this, we had Bishamon identified the same way. Rhavkin (talk) 16:01, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

Are you serious? As I said, there is no confirmation for the character's identity. It is a fan's tweet, not an official source. Also, Fukage is very strange way to pronounce 風影 in Japanese. --Klobis (talk) 23:10, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

So name it "Kazekage" and we'll change it if necessary, we can even add Conjectural Name to the page if it is such a big deal. And again, like Bishamon, it is best to go with the assumption we have since we know it is a character. Even official sources misidentify characters like Charlotte Gala was in the official site. This is all we have, and it is better then a general page, so it is either that or delete the page altogether. Rhavkin (talk) 03:11, April 16, 2020 (UTC)

If we can't ID the character, then delete the page for now. 03:14, April 16, 2020 (UTC)

There is literally no information aside from an episode appearance. The page does not need to exist. 03:59, April 16, 2020 (UTC)

Didn't we identified Bishamon based on the same source? Rhavkin (talk) 16:08, April 16, 2020 (UTC)

Talked with Awaikage about it. I don't think we can clearly determine who the character is. So the page should be deleted for now. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 22:03, April 16, 2020 (UTC)

Again, how is this different from Bishamon? Rhavkin (talk) 07:12, April 17, 2020 (UTC)

I'm with Kaido and Nada on this one. It's premature. 03:19, April 18, 2020 (UTC)