Forum:Gifs Discussion, Re-opened

Where .gifs are concerned, there seems to be this prevailing belief that they are simply not allowed, because they are rarely seen here any more. This is despite there being set rules which specifically illustrate where and when the application of .gifs are allowed. Rules, some users here would rather bury, and ignore. I understand the fear of these bandwidth draining images being spammed, however that shouldn't result in an outright shunning of a valuable, and effective means of presentation.

That's why I'd like to re-open this discussion, to a certain degree. I myself recently learnt how to make quality .gif images, and have already updated several images as necessary. I also know of a couple other users (such as Croc), who also tried this new method and got a grasp at how to make them.

The point I'd like to present, is that I feel one of the problems with using .gifs is that we've (presumably) had to rely on alternative sources for our animated images. This would mean risking subtitles, watermarks and general low quality. What I'm trying to present is, with users who know how to make these images and have quality footage on file waiting to be used, why not make a collaborative effort in providing proper animations for articles that both deserve and need them?

If simple talk pages are insufficient, a page could even be made where requests for specific files could be made for the users who possess the skill required, to come and see to. This would allow for more efficient images to be made. I envision it as being something like;

''Hi! We need a short .gif of Blamenco pulling out his weapon from his chin. The image only needs to be 190px wide, as that's what we'll set the image as.''



Or something along those lines, this would maximise the effectiveness of the .gifs and not result in unnecessary file sizes. Knowing you guys though it'll probably be requested in a much less formal manner~. Basically that could work whenever a .gif is absolutely necessary, and any resizing wouldn't be an issue as the .gif creator should still have the footage required to make a new version of the file.

Well, that's my proposition and I'd be happy to be the 'go-between' guy for this process if it is accepted. It'll sure as hell be a lot easier to acquire proper .gifs then just searching Photobucket or the forums. 19:08, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Gifs suck hairy donkey balls, tijuana style. The less we have of them the better.

They're really only needed on Devil Fruit pages. The ones we have only suck because the rules hugely limited them. SeaTerror 01:13, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

^ That's exactly right, Devil Fruit/Powers only, whenever a still image cannot show what's being illustrated. Like the above .gif, or Sanji's Blue Walk technique. 01:27, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Magellan's powers is a big one too. SeaTerror 01:49, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, but I think we should have an additional rule: .gifs are not allowed to have fan-subtitles within them, as both File:Blue Walk 525.gif and File:Shambles.wmv.GIF do. 03:43, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

That was already the rule from the original forum. I see absolutely nothing wrong with subtitles anyway. SeaTerror 03:45, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

I don't mind either way, but fan subbers make it difficult to remove those specific subtitles as they are put directly onto the video, and aren't a separate subtitles file like the rest of dialogue. And as they are the source of high quality footage... So unless we crop them out (reducing visibility significantly) or search for RAWs (which are difficult enough to find recent episode, let alone older episodes), then technique names might need some leniency towards, unlike regular dialogue which can be removed without any complications. 05:00, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

Yonkou and Yibis use MKV so those are the only subbers you could get subless GIFs from. Like you said, it would be impossible for older ones. SeaTerror 06:46, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

If the gif has good quality and no subs, then its perfect. I agree on having them.

I'm ok to remove some restrictions to gifs, but I'm afraid that this will lead only to a mass upload of pointless gifs... I mean "Sanji's blue walk" technique? It's something that probably will never use ever again... who cares if there we haven't a gif of it. After said that, I'd like to know how to create/edit gifs, which software are you using?

Well, the rules already in place would allow for mass uploads. So really what's stopping it from being spammed is so many people simply do not know how to make them. I only made one of Sanji's Blue Walk because we had a manga image instead, so if that's the technique that's being illustrated why not put the gif there? As for the program I use, it's just through Photoshop which allows me to create gifs of any size up to the original video proportions, and edit them freely (such as cropping the black letterboxing).

I'm just suggesting that rather then rely on .gifs found on Photobucket or Google Images, we simply make use of the resources at our disposal, in an effective manner by making our own proper .gifs that show exactly what's needed, nothing more, and by determining the size of the .gif we will be optimising the file size as well. 07:12, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

‎‎ A gif should be added if really necessary in my opinion, I know it's cool, but a gif is very heavy, so too many gifs will just slow down the page, this is also a thing to take in consideration. And the current rules doesn't allow mass upload, there are some restrictions. I'm sorry to say this, but I think the blue walk gif and the Utase Ami one are really not necessary... can you focus on more complex techniques? I mean, blue walk it's just Sanji swimming fast... if you really want to show a more complete image add the manga image.

"A gif should be added if really necessary" - I agree with this. But what is 'necessary' or not is something I feel we're going to disagree strongly on. By mass uploads, I meant over the wiki entirely, not just single articles which I am well aware of the restriction. It's common practice to replace manga images with the animation counterparts, which is why I am against retaining the manga images when the anime has shown the technique clearly, but on rare occasions requires an animated demonstration. Whether the technique is recurring or complex doesn't matter, as a wiki it's our responsibility to provide clear understanding of the topic and if that requires the occasional .gif then so be it.

And as you brought up here about the subs, that is a restriction that should be removed as like I stated in that talk, high quality footage is difficult to come by, and even more difficult to find one that hasn't embedded the technique name (not dialogue, just the name) into the video.

I'll reiterate, I am not suggesting we let loose with the gifs and clog up the articles. I am just suggesting that we take advantage of the fact we have people who can custom make these gifs (file size, image size and length or what is presented) and do so when absolutely necessary. Like in the case of this gif for Luffy's Gomu Gomu no Storm, the original was taken up mostly by Luffy's initial punch going through the sand - unnecessary. So I instead cut the footage into a way that showed more of the technique itself.

If a still image can show the technique, great! We'll use that. If it has been animated in a way that won't allow this, then don't be so stubborn about using a gif, and take advantage of the resources available to make an effective gif that isn't larger then it has to be, doesn't show more then it has to, and is of a decent quality. 12:06, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

I have all episode from 382+ with soft subs if that's can be helpful. I understand your point and at least you know what you are talking about and not just upload random thing, as you said the issue was born on "A gif should be added if really necessary". I think that we should focus on main techniques anyway, I just questioned the purpose of uploading a gif for a minor technique... there are tons of technique that don't even have an image, moreover a gif.

Well, I've already gone through Luffy, Zoro and Sanji's pages, updating them with images (sparingly because an image for every technique would just be the same as putting heaps of gifs in). So that's why I know many techniques are presentable with still images. It's just that a couple aren't animated in a way that allows this, (I'll completely ignore the anime-only section as they'd all require gifs, no single frames). And if we're going to present these minor techniques (with manga or anime images) I feel they should still get the same treatment of any other technique, and in the case of techniques such as Blue Walk, Trawl Net or even Robin's cloning ability (which caught my attention about the whole anti-gif attitude) they simply need a gif to receive the same treatment.

Which is exactly why I'm offering to help with these, and not just let editors rely on Photobucket and Google in these rare cases, where they have no control of what the gifs show, and can only take what they get. 12:33, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

I wasn't against you uploading/editing gifs, please do it, I was questioning the purpose of some gifs... just like the history page has some pictures of important moments, the techniques pages should have some illustrations for important ones, not necessary all of them, that is my opinion.

In my opinion a GIF should only be used when a still is not enough to illustrate what really needs to be illustrated, that means GIFs should be used for techniques only. There is no need for them in the history section.

Rather than discussing whether GIFs are good or bad we should list which techniques are actually worth illustrating them with a GIF and then ask Kuro to make one for them.

19:08, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the support Neo, I think that'd work best when it comes to using gifs. :)  15:09, July 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * Too bad Wikia doesn't host video files itself, does it? AFAIR, the embedded plugin uses Videos from other portal sites as YouTube. D:
 * I just created a video version from File:Bubbly Coral 539 V2.gif as Ogg Theora with 1,600 kB/s - 240 Pixels width, TrueColor, 23.976fps and 605kB (ogg) vs. 240 Pixels width, 256 colors, unknown framerate and 1.21 MB (initial gif). -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 18:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, Wikia does support Ogg Theora files - but the Image Guidelines don't allow them here. Just saw it when I was about to test it. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 18:42, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hm. It actually works pretty fine, even as thumbnail within an article. -- [ defchris ] · [ Diskussion ] · 18:44, July 20, 2012 (UTC)