Talk:Shandia Chief

Conjectural title?
First of all, on Talk:Shandians it was proven that it's "Shandia" and not "Shandian", so he needs a name change. But if we don't know his true name, isn't this page conjecturally titled? And even if it isn't, how do we differentiate between him and the Shandia chief of 400 years ago? 15:06, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Do we have a page for the old Shandia chief? 15:14, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

How about turning it into a category and display the two known chiefs with "????" under their pictures, however stating all their appearance and other features?

Bump. 10:31, October 10, 2013 (UTC)

We need this solved before the chief thing takes turn. It's a pretty major thing and we are stopped half way editing the pages.

Didn't we settle that one? 13:53, October 10, 2013 (UTC)

Very clear majority there. No reason for the "should we" to be discussed.

As for conjectural, he's referred to as this many times (there's Kanji and Romanji for it, so it doesn't really fit the conjectural definition, like "Samurai from Wano" would), and I don't think deleting his article would be beneficial at all. 00:25, October 12, 2013 (UTC)

But how do we differentiate him from the Shandia Chief from 400 years ago? And how do we correct that we have no information or images for that character? 15:14, October 12, 2013

We didn't have a page for the Chief from 400 years ago before. I say we keep it as just unnamed Chief in the Shandia page. 15:22, October 12, 2013 (UTC)