User talk:Dragonus Nesha

Edits
Your edits have been pretty good! Keep up the good work :) 21:47, December 4, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Radio Knife
Actually I did see Trebol piecing himself back together while after Law revealed to Doflamingo that he had the "D" but didn't see him pierce his staff. So I'm not saying that it should be added in, I'm just letting you know. ChasHades (talk) 05:16, September 6, 2016 (UTC)

re:Jet Board
Well, he was wielding the board at chapter 237 and episode 153. That's actually what counts, I guess. 22:15, December 20, 2016 (UTC)

In that case, I actually don't really know. I just saw the Jet Board was as it is under a subsection of the Dials, so decided to create the page. I never truly bothered to check clearly. 22:31, December 20, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Caramel
It was based on this: https://orojackson.com/threads/one-piece-chapter-859-the-yonko-assassination-plan.37221/page-33#post-2226148 Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 22:26, March 15, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Eternal Log
Ahh, thank you! I'll put it back on the page. 16:35, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

Pluton is not the god of wealth
You see Pluton comes indeed from the greek name Πλουτωνας (Ploutonas) and is the 2nd brother of Zeus and king of the otherworld known as Hades. The greek word for wealth happens to be πλούτος (ploutos) but they just happen to sound alike and Pluton's name is not actually derived by the greek name of wealth. In ancient Greece people actually feared wealth just because it sounded like the name of the King of Hades and his name was linked with the fear of greed the ancient greeks develped. It should be clear by now that Pluton is not the God of wealth but the exact opposite of it. His only epithets are either the God of Hades or the King of the itherworld or Hades (sometumes they call him by the name of his kingdom) but in absolute no way the God of wealth. How do i know? I just happen to be greek with a bit of love for mythology. Hope i helped.

I have from the greek wikia page for Πλούτονα but the translated english wikia page has way too much inacuracies regarding the subject. But anyway the thing is the "related to wealth" trivia part is wrong. The rest regarding the inspiration of the name is ok and thats why i didnt delete it.

Omatsuri
Hey Nesha. Sorry, I didn't mean to start a reference war, but I specified those references because I plan to expand the page. Also, I find that marking specific events (in my opinion) makes things easier to tie together. I did the same with all of the Movie 6 articles and a number of other pages I've worked on that have only one source document. I do like the idea of timestamps in the referencing, so hopefully we can come to a compromise. Thanks! 23:15, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

I agree with you Dragonus Nesha, not only timestamps but also home video releases should be included in references if not also American and if not than just japan Season and Piece and probably than some, also panels, anime adaptions do not always end with the page, if the Administrators have it in there power to change the reference code then we should ask.--Robertg27 (talk) 23:59, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

You're right that they don't add anything, but nothing is in the rule about it. I'm guilty of having done both ways in the past on many pages. So it's not like it didn't exist before. About the template, it's an extremely complicated one made by a user who's not around anymore. It's also kind of hard to have set rules on time stamps. So just want to say that both cases are accepted by me at least, I don't find anything wrong with the way Monty did it. Hope you understand, and if you disagree, we can always discuss it somewhere. Sincerely,

13:12, May 7, 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hey Dragon. Thanks for fixing some of that vandalism. I'll clean up the rest. 00:21, May 24, 2017 (UTC)

Stussy's ref
I cleaned up the references because there were some mislabeled, duplicates pages, and no explanation. I don't understand why you changed them back, so I reverted your edit, and I would like to ask you explain your reasoning before undoing it again. Thank you. Rhavkin (talk) 04:43, July 7, 2017 (UTC)


 * We do not know who arrived with which pig.
 * I did not know this is how the debut is registered. I agree that if that is the norm, them it should be changed back.
 * I do know, however, that double pages are always counted together regardless of what information appeared on which page.
 * I don't think "Intro" and "Debut" should be separated, but I may be mistaken. Can you explain the difference?
 * Pages 4-6 cover the whole "Stussy is from CP-0 reveal" how she revealed that and to who is not separation worthy.

Rhavkin (talk) 21:34, July 7, 2017 (UTC)