Forum:Dragonus Nesha

Dragonus Nesha continues to annoy me and imagines that since he is a moderator, he can edit the fandom however he wants. I tried many times to explain to him, but he refused to listen to me. He removed what needs to be added each time. I tried to explain to him that SBS Volume 105 should have all the images, and not only did he delete some of the images, he also protected them so that I couldn't restore the images he deleted. Thus, he corrupts the pages. Therefore, I demand that he not only be banned, but also deprived of his status as a moderator. Babaev (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Discussion
DN is an amazing editor with excellent knowledge of the wiki’s policies. That’s why he is trusted with the role of Content Moderator. He is correct in removing the unnecessary images from SBS Volume 105, we should not have every single image from each SBS. He is not “refusing to listen” to you, he is just preventing your edits from harming the wiki.

It’s disrespectful to assume that he is in the wrong here, and often enough to open a ban forum. We’re always open to discussing the reasoning behind edits, but if you can’t have that discussion with respect, or “demanding” someone’s bans, it’s you that will be facing the ban. And considering your previous bans, that next ban would be at least 6 months. 12:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Let's go with the points I brought up for the removal of the images from SBS 105:
 * "Terrible" referred to the broken text formatting and long stack of images. Placing images in the bodies of text affects how the text is displayed and can make the answers difficult to read and follow as they force line breaks and shifts in text. Other images weren't properly spaced so they stacked on top of each other, pushing them further away from the corresponding question, which runs counter to the images' purpose.


 * The wiki is for recording information about the series, not recreating the SBS in whole. The latter would be an attempt to create a copy to supplant the original material, which is not allowed under the fair use doctrine of copyright. As such, our use of images has to be limited to those needed for the explanation of the Q&A. For examples, the absence of Luffy's face doesn't affect our understanding of whether or not the newer Straw Hats know about the earlier East Blue adventures, whereas the illustration of Kaidou's puckered face is the entire answer to a question so it is required for understanding. Your repeated counterargument ("SBS Volume 105 should have all the images") supports my assessment that these were a misuse of images.

If you had asked, I could've provided you with these specifics. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Nesha, I didn't ask you about it because I didn't want to. Babaev (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Then why did you create this fourm just to attack him in such a childish matter? Communicate is the key to understanding each other.

If you don't like what Dragonus is doing then you can move to other subjects or leave.

Joekido (talk) 18:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)