Talk:Hito Hito no Mi, Model: Daibutsu

Name
Daibutsu and Buddha are not same, I think. Daibutsu is statue of Buddha. --Klobis 10:42, November 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * That would be correct, Yatanogarasu rushed a bit to create the name. MasterDeva 19:38, November 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, you people also also just put up the name of something you read on Binktopia scanlations, before other scanlations come out with more accurate translations. Just move it to "Hito Hito no Mi, Model: Daibutsu" then. Yatanogarasu 05:31, November 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * I can only speak for my self and with 100% certainty I've never done that. I always wait for Carlos (cnet128) translations if I have to write something and I also check Stephen's for the old volume's and stuff. Mangastream/Binktopia is a speed scanlation group and as such their chapter translations will always have more mistakes since it's speed>quality in terms of proper script translation.


 * Note: Binktopia's scanlations usually were better than many other speedscan groups on the scene but after their their merger with Mangastream resulted in dropping the translations done by cnet they are not doing so good anymore... MasterDeva 11:01, November 5, 2010 (UTC)

SBS Volume 60
Shouldn't you guys have just waited until a translation of SBS Volume 60 was put on the site before you made this page? And don't tell me to go find it myself, because the job of editors here is to put up credible information with reliable sources as well. I don't think this page should have even been made without that source to back it up. I've been surfing Arlong Park all day before and after class and I haven't found this translation of it yet. Subrosian 01:59, November 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually there's been confirmation and proper translations done at Arlong Park, you just didn't search good enough. By the time you wrote this message it was out! MasterDeva 11:01, November 5, 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but it still isn't my job to confirm your sources for you. I'm not a veteran editor here so I shouldn't have to search anymore than to pique my own curiosity. I found nothing, so until I see some hard evidence this article is unnecessary to me. I believe it was you who said my "edits are in good faith." Subrosian 17:12, November 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * You've made a mistake there though Subrosian. Part of people's work in this IS finding references to add to the articles, myself included, that's no brainer. How many articles you think there were that had no sources and editors added them or hom many articles there that still have none? Too many! Like Wikipedians say "editing an encyclopedia isn't only spelling correction". As I've said before your edits are in good faith but you must also understand how this wiki works (and generally the majority of them); finding sources and adding text isn't a privilege of some "elit" of editors sort of speak. The One Piece Wikia grew to become what it is because people cared enough to contribute and improve it! MasterDeva 21:37, November 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * No matter how one may try, not all sources will be available to everyone everywhere. People have confirmed this translation, and not everyone, myself included, will ever see it. Regardless, enough independent confirmation exists for the go-ahead. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 20:04, November 5, 2010 (UTC)