Category talk:Smokers

Brook a Smoker
heres confirmation that Brook smoked in Strong World http://s1262.photobucket.com/albums/ii609/DarkSkullPirates/?action=view&current=tumblr_lj6dd7Fray1qah4nko1_400.gif

~DSP 22:37, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

I remember seeing Brook smoke for a couple seconds during Movie 10. Should we add him, or is it un-nessacary? (forgot to sign, Sanji the Cook (talk) 15:32, August 20, 2012 (UTC))

Please confirm, and remember to sign in the future. Evanalmighty 11:49, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Useless
Facial Hair category useless? Then so is this one. Burn it with fire. Galaxy9000 (talk) 15:05, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

I dunno, I kind of like this one. I discovered a few new characters that smoke. Sanji the Cook (talk) 15:31, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

I discovered some new people with facial hair. That one got deleted, so this one is useless too. Galaxy9000 (talk) 15:33, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

The number of people in this category is smaller, so smoking can actually be considered a distinctive trait. On the other hand, every man and his dog has facial hair. 16:08, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

There are a lot of antagonists... should we get rid of them? There are still a lot of characters without facial hair. Galaxy9000 (talk) 16:12, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, looking back, I see how useless this category is too. But I like it anyway 16:19, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Cool. If this one exists, then why not facial hair? Galaxy9000 (talk) 16:21, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Because we don't need anything else excessive. You're obviously just bashing this one because you're bitter about your category getting deleted. Yes, there's some vestigial stuff here, but that doesn't mean we need more of it. 16:29, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

I think facial hair is a too big of a category for something pretty trivial. Smokers is smaller than Facial Hair, so I guess it can stay. 16:31, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

But there are also a good many people that do not have facial hair. Also, this category incorporates people who aren't even regular smokers, so yeah. Galaxy9000 (talk) 16:34, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

This category is fine, just leave it. The category for characters with facial hair was really unnecessary, it would be like adding another ridiculous category like "characters with black hair". 16:43, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

That one would be stupid. But people with facial hair isn't. If you go any further than that, then yes it's bad, but facial hair should be fine. Galaxy9000 (talk) 16:45, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I know it would be stupid. Characters with facial hair also is. You added some characters that did not belong to that category such as Bepo. 16:53, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Stupid to you. You're not looking at it from the perspective of someone who is just reading the wiki. Bepo was an accident during my sleepy state. Galaxy9000 (talk) 16:55, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Actually it's stupid to several other people. Even a wiki contributor asked why we had that category in the talk page. Ok then, I guess that's an excuse, still random though. 17:12, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

That wiki contributor was someone who hadn't logged on. They never act like that. Galaxy9000 (talk) 17:17, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

thats a pretty big stereotype of AWCs 17:21, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

It's true anyway. It was LPK. SeaTerror (talk) 17:23, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Exactly. We can find it useless all we want, but the ones who actually read the wiki probably don't. Galaxy9000 (talk) 17:29, August 20, 2012 (UTC)