Forum:Placement of stub template

Maybe that is just a minor issue, but I want to unify placement of stub templates in pages. Currently the following variants occur:


 * before "Site Navigation" section:
 * after "Site Navigation" header but before naviboxes (illogical in my opinion)
 * after all naviboxes (this seems to be the most frequent variant)
 * (rarely) at the beginning of article or another position

Also, sometimes there is a gap (blank space) between stub template and the following/preceding content and sometimes there is not such gap.

So, let's decide which one to use and thus unify look of the pages a bit more. --Ruxax 16:25, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Poll
Where should stub templates go? Beginning of Article Before "Site Navigation" header After "Site Navigation" header but before Naviboxes After Naviboxes

^Here's a poll. Normally I'd say at the beginning of an article, since that's the norm of most wikias. But for this one... I'm not sure... --YazzyDream 16:41, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

I think after the Naviboxes, because it looks visually better that way. Well, if you reduce the size on the Gaimon picture to as small as the "This article about a character is a stub. You can help the One Piece Encyclopedia by expanding it", it'd look nicer enough to go on the beginning of the article, or in a box, like Template:Featured Article. Yatanogarasu 14:50, August 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * Right, if it goes to the bottom of the page it would be nice if all the sub templates were uniformed and looked like the Template:VA stub. YazzyDream 16:32, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

I myself prefer after all naviboxes, it's visually the best, imo. I don't like inside "Site Navigation" because it is illogical - stub template is not a means of navigation. In the beginning of article will be bad when there is another template there - an often example is template. Ruxax 09:21, August 27, 2010 (UTC)