Talk:Paradise

Do you really think that "Paradise" is the name of the first half of the Grand Line? I think that your opinion come form the sentence "all men of honor who step foot in the New World say this, about... : "that ocean was paradise"". Well, that is a joke, a gag, I don't know the real name. I mean, when Luffy and Buggy went from Impel Down level 1 to level 2, they could have said "that level was paradise" but this doesn't mean that "paradise" is level 1's name! If you are right, then that name would be known also in "paradise" itself. Instead, that is only thought by people who are now in the New World. However we can mantain this name until the real name is presented. --Meganoide 10:47, August 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * In agreement. One-Winged Hawk 11:03, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree too. YazzyDream 14:57, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, that's what the pirates call it. It's a lot better sounding than "First half of the Grand Line". Yatanogarasu 16:01, August 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * It is just like an epithet of a character. Ruxax 16:31, August 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, it's the only official name we got so far, so let's keep it. A lot better than an unofficial name. Yatanogarasu 16:50, August 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * In fact, all info at this page is already contained in Grand Line page, so I see no need for this page. And for places in the first half of Grand Line reference that they "are in the Grand Line" is much more common then references like "they are in the Paradise". Ruxax 16:57, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Paradise is the official name. Therefore, what is the different between the New World article and this? New World also is an epithet for the second half of the Grand Line, why no one complained about this? Merge both articles or leave as it is. Tipota 12:08, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Tipota, either Grand Line shall have 2 sections, Paradise and New world with their location list or we keep the 2 pages. If we keep the 2 pages the § Grand_Line#Places_in_the_Grand_Line shall be deleted as it is completely redundant with the other pages content. Kdom 12:19, August 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * Have to agree with reasons for keeping the page. Its all we have to go on.Mugiwara Franky 12:39, August 26, 2010 (UTC)