Template talk:Canon

Needed?
As with the category that was attempted to be made a few days ago, I feel like this is a wildly unnecessary effort to be technical about identifying canon attacks with names from video games. Any good technique description of this nature should A) Have a source about where this technique appears and B) State where this technique was named. In my opinion, that gets the point across perfectly fine, and is far more informative and encyclopedic than this template. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 16:02, August 28, 2020 (UTC)

Delete it. The only reason we have the other template is because its for non canon. So by default this is useless since we identify what is canon automatically. SeaTerror (talk) 17:14, August 28, 2020 (UTC)

I agree. If the names are references (either through a qref or by stating, "this technique was in [game name]," then it is fine. This is unnecessary. 17:57, August 28, 2020 (UTC)