Forum:Page Issues

Welcome to the Page Issues, where, hopefully, miscelaneous issues that do not fall in to blanket categories may be resolved.

Issue # 1: One Piece Mugen
http://onepiece.wikia.com/wiki/One_Piece_Grand_line_bout

Note, I do not nominate the article for deletion, but I just wish to know how it could be improved to make it not look like someone advertising themselves.Basicly, it would need a general re write, but I wonder if anyone else thinks so.

--New Babylon 00:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm unsure. Their not offical, so don't count as anything.  Mugen games in general are in most cases not referenced on wikis.  They are made up, unoffical, etc, etc.  It saves a lot of time if you don't write anything up on them.  Plus, they pretty much are "fan fiction" as such in my books and we have guidelines advising against them.  Its pretty much a simulair situation as with "dub piece" which also had made an article here.  Plus, mugen games can end up being remade several times, thus its impossible to track all the versions.  One-Winged Hawk 01:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Another point is, they voilate copyright rules and the wiki staff are against illegal activies. We have a link straight to that Beta, which must be removed ASAP without question.  We have only passed the rules once on this sort of thing; our main page, which safely counts as we have strick warnings on the contents of other sites.  We cannot link to Bittorents, so we like wise, cannot link to betas for illegal copy right infringment based games.  Mugenitself has been questioned since day dot of its legalness.  One-Winged Hawk


 * Fair enough. --New Babylon 01:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Issue # 2: Wording Creativity
Can we have some sort of consensus upon not being too "creative" with forming sentences and paragraph headings? Im talking about "Dark conspiracy", a former name for a paragraph on Robin's article, or "death to all in the way" (yes, MY FAULT, please, I was hyped, forgive me). We realy should try to aim for a more encyclopedia-esque wording, or we will end up looking not to professional. --New Babylon 01:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)