Talk:Explosive

Needed?
I think yes but if anyone disagree go ahead. Rhavkin (talk) 10:53, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

Pamu Pamu no Mi and Tamatebako
I think the Pamu Pamu is close enough to be consider explosive because is it compered to the Bomu Bomu no Mi on multiple pages (its own and the Donquixote Pirates'), and it is stated to cause explosions.

The Tamatebako has a bomb of an unknown type inside of it, since its survived a fall from the roof the another floor and did not detonate when Du Feld peaked inside so I think its worth mentioning. Rhavkin (talk) 10:53, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

The devil fruits (bomb bomb and pamu pamu) should not be listed in the bombs section. They could be mentioned in a trivia or "see also" section, but by listing thme in the "bombs" section you are implying they are bombs. They are not, they are devil fruits. The same goes for the tamatebako: by listing it with other explosives you are assuming it is an explosive, but it's not. You said it yourself: the tamatebako has an explosive inside it, but the tamatebako itself is not an explosive. Like with the devil fruits, it would be fine mentioning it in a trivia / see also section, but it should not be mixed with the actual explosives.

The Bomu Bomu no Mi should be in the bombs section because its power is that of bombs. Its like saying the biscuits from the Bisu Bisu no Mi aren't biscuits.

The Pamu Pamu no Mi is indeed not a bomb, but it does generate explosions which is way I suggest to name this page "Explosives" instead of Rgilbert27's suggestion "Bombs". The Tamatebako was the thing that exploded. It was the casing of the explosive materiel. Every one said "the Tamatebako will explode" not "the bomb inside the Tamatebako will explode".The Tamatebako has an unknown type of explosive inside of it. Maybe they shouldn't be mentioned at the bombs sections but the "Others" section? Rhavkin (talk) 11:58, November 13, 2017 (UTC)