File talk:Monkey D. Luffy Portrait.png

Better pic?
Anyone got a better pic? This one makes Luffy seem 8 years old... not 17. Go go to "upload new version". Settings are 120px by 120px. One-Winged Hawk 20:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Manga vs. Anime
Just adding my input. Manga is better. 14:50, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

Just adding my input. No. 16:17, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

It definitely is. Not drawn by a wonky animator, and is drawn by the man who created the series himself. 19:13, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

No. 19:31, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

Can somebody that actually responds with legitimate reasons respond? 19:34, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

SHL's arguments actually kinda remind me of some discussions with you, Gal! Anyway, "No" is not an argument. We got a perfect manga pic, no need to use the anime, for reasons stated by Gal.

The anime is better because it's brighter and luffy's scar can me seen and in the manga you can also see luffy's finger which is not good for a portrait. 20:02, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with SHL, the finger looks stupid. 20:12, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

Well thank you. 21:48, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

We can see Luffy's scar just fine in the manga version. The finger is barely a distraction. 21:54, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

No you can't 22:25, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

The finger is not a big deal, but the scar is indeed kinda hidden in the manga version.

Didn't notice the finger until you mentioned it. I don't see a problem with the scar.

Colored manga pic > anime pic. I can't see how some adapted content can be preferred to the original, drawn by the author himself. Shenduk (talk) 03:01, May 3, 2013 (UTC)Shenduk

The anime is more detailed. As I've already said colored manga is great but it's rarely good for portraits. 08:38, May 3, 2013 (UTC)