Luffy zoro Law sanji -1
And
Rayleigh Shanks Mihawk Fujitora-2
I know its a clichéd discussion but still...
In my opinion 1-luffy>zoro>law>sanji
2-mihawk=shanks>Rayleigh>fujitora
Luffy zoro Law sanji -1
And
Rayleigh Shanks Mihawk Fujitora-2
I know its a clichéd discussion but still...
In my opinion 1-luffy>zoro>law>sanji
2-mihawk=shanks>Rayleigh>fujitora
@takanova.. but if law use CoO that make transportation and cutting also quick, you dont know what happen when law sending luffy to ocean suddenly or cut luffy in pieces. gear 2 or boundman will be useless. you also forget law has countershock and gamma knife which is good physical attack too. therefore we dont know who's the winner.
Counter shock was scrap to vergo
And the same way doffy avoided being caught in his df, luffy can do the same too... That's supposing luffy has knowledge of the limits of his power
Genius lufffy@ Law is not CoO user.He's a CoC user.
PS: I don't know if CoC means Busoshoku Haki or Haoshoku Haki though!
Law has both @takanova. dont doubt your own answer. he's D after all. am i right?
Genius lufffy@ If he's a D doesn't necesserily means he can use CoO or even haki in general. Portgas D. Saul and Portgas D. Rouge are examples.Also, It's not mentioned in the wiki that Law uses CoO and he's never shown using it.
@takanova dont be fool please, every D. people have haki in general.
it's proved in manga and anime, you must look them very carefully. and once again dont just too much rely what wiki says. they can guessing whatever they want. but the facts speaks differently. ask oda or sbs if you wanna know the truth. okay..oh god you are really stubborn one. lol
I wonder whether you know oda personally or you chat buddies.
@takanova CoO is observation haki
CoA armament, while CoC.. Conquerors.
And being a Doesn't mean you must have haki, especially CoC
See @Genius lufffy even @Raw agrees with me. Besides, wiki based on facts and you're talking like you know something. And if you do then prove me wrong then we will see really who's the stubborn one.
@Takanova don't bother arguing with him.