FANDOM

5,427 Pages

Forums: Index → Site Problems →  Onepiece.Wikkii.Net External Links
Note: This topic has been archived because the discussion is considered solved.
Do not add to it unless it really needs to be reopened. Consider creating a brand new forum instead.

Overview

This forum is concerning the matter of the various Onepiece.Wikkii.Net external links that have been repeatedly removed since I revisited here. I wish that this matter didn't have to come to this but because of a lack of response, it has come to this. For those that maybe new to the matter, here is a history lesson.

Prior to wikia's current skin format, it used to be something like that of Wikipedia's. However, the big wigs at wikia decided to change it per case study or something. In response to this, a group of editors banded together calling themselves the Anti-Wikia Alliance in opposition to the new skin choice. Part of the response the alliance had was moving content to new wiki hosting sites since wikia won't concede. Thus was the creation of Onepiece.Wikkii.Net at Wikkii.

In order to help "promote" the site and get possible editors on board, I previously placed several external links on certain articles to their respective articles on the Onepiece.Wikkii.Net. While I was at Onepiece.Wikkii.Net busy fixing things by myself in order to make it presentable, there was a discussion between DancePowderer and Yatanogarasu deciding that these links be removed via bot because of the association they had with the Anti-Wikia Alliance. They were thus removed without as much of a complaint because the associated parties were not around to complain.

Now when I returned to this wikia to check how things were doing, I noticed the links were all removed. So I decided to put them back. However, they were removed once again. So I put them back again. And then there were removed once again. It apparently became clear that no matter what I did, they seemed to be constantly removed as if they were viewed as vandalism. So I frustratingly tried to place them back with an explanation that they were of a legitimate site. It was then however that Yatanogarasu came around and informed me of the decision to remove them via what I personally see as a back alley agreement.

So I've talked to them via talk pages to reinstate the links. As it is a simple matter, I did so in hopes of it not becoming a full fledged site wide forum that might drag in others outside of the matter. However because I have not yet received a proper response from DancePowderer from which I assume is the originator of the removal based on Yatanogarasu's info, and because it really seems that everyone wants a forum on the matter, I've decided to open the matter as such.Mugiwara Franky 10:45, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Arguments For

  1. It is true that Wikkii was proposed as an alternate to Wikia by the Anti-Wiki Alliance. However, the site itself is not directly a part of the Alliance. It is simply a wiki hosting site that gives service as any other wiki hosting site. It is not a part of the Anti-Wiki Alliance, just one of the many site proposals given by the alliance to people who wished to move their wikis elsewhere.
  2. There is actually some still ties between the two sites apart from me Mugiwara Franky. While it is mostly content transferred from here to Onepiece.Wikkii.Net, there is actually content from Onepiece.Wikkii.Net that was transferred here. Example: The random featured template used here was developed by actually me. I implemented it in Onepiece.Wikkii.Net on November while MasterDeva implemented a similar format in this wikia on December. I had no idea my design was copied nor was I asked permission. However seeing this means that there is something between the sites being shared both ways and not just one way.
  3. The links promote Wikkii and not Wikia of course. However that is to be expected as they are "external" links. They generally promote things they link to and those things happen to be external to Wikia. If you wish to promote Wikia via an external link, you simply look no farther than what is in front of you.
  4. There are several other external links that have been allowed without much hesitation because they are relevant to the articles. Why should the Onepiece.Wikkii.Net external links be excluded?
    1. Hody Jones has an external link to Idée_fixe_(psychology). Speculative to some but relevant to Hody's article given the character's nature. Why should the link to his page in Onepiece.Wikkii.Net thus be excluded when it is an actual article about Hody?
    2. Sanji has an external link to a a rather outdated fansite. Why should the link to his page in Onepiece.Wikkii.Net thus be excluded when it is not just a single fansite page.
    3. The Thousand Sunny has an external link to a german wiki article on it. Why should the link to its page in Onepiece.Wikkii.Net thus be excluded when it is written in English.
    4. Monkey D. Luffy has an external link to a stub of an article. Why should the link to his page in Onepiece.Wikkii.Net thus be excluded when it is more than a stub.
  5. The links are meant to provide access to people who may want a similar article but with a skin format similar to wikipedia. Big width, right aligned, and not smushed in the middle. As a bonus, those who may come to Onepiece.Wikkii.Net may also help out in the wikkii. A thing that it desperately needs since its creation. It's a long shot of course but still a shot.

Arguments Against

  1. Quote:I've been thinking about this for a while. What do you think about getting rid of the Wikkii links on the characters' and other pages? I mean, aside from MF being a former member, we have virtually no ties to Wikkii. Also, considering Wikkii is part of the anti-wikia alliance (ask Roranoa zoro if you want to know more), it might just seem bad taste. I don't know. Personally, I don't think we should have them. What do you think?DancePowderer Talk 05:48, July 9, 2011 (UTC)"
  2. The external links section is for extra information that can't fit into the article, not for advertising.Bastian964 02:02, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

I have posted my arguments for their reinclusion and the arguments I could currently find for against them. This is not a vote I ask for. This is a request from a former editor to reinstate something that maybe considered his last edits here.Mugiwara Franky 10:45, February 28, 2012 (UTC)


I see no problem with having the external links to wikii, it's essentially the same as linking to the german/catalan etc. one piece wikias. We're not in competition with wikii, it should be viewed mainly as a partnersite and thus we should have links to them and they to us.  Fanta Talk  10:57, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Seconded. sff9 11:50, February 28, 2012

Like Pandawarrior said, we are not in competition between the two communities. Therefore I don't think that the external links should be shunned. I agree with what Mugiwara Franky said, as other external links are allowed there is no problem with having links to one particular site when it is related to One Piece, after all both the sites are One Piece fan bases. So, yes, I support the reinstating of the links.  Blackened D. Soul  Talk  12:04, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry to say this, but I'm against adding external links to the wikki one piece wiki. I'm sorry because I know how it's frustrating running a wiki by yourself alone. Regarding the reason why the wikki was created in the first place, it was on the spur of the moment for the mandatory new skin, now you can still use monobook in your personal skin and we can add a skin switch button in the interface like I did in my wiki (see top bar).
Some of you said that we are not in competition, that's not really true because if I were to made another English wiki (even here to Wikia) because I refused to go along with some site-decisions (case like this actually happens) why would you have to support me? The most reasonable choice in this case is trying to merge the two wiki. If you have two or more wikis on the same argument in the same language you will only just split the viewers and the editors just to have the same content with only slightly differences, that's not advantageous at all. So having more version of the same wiki is always bad, although in the case of the Wikki we cannot merge the two wikis and I personally understand the reason behind the original protest (and somewhat I support them). Other reasons:

  • The Wikki content was originally copied and it's still been copied from this wiki, although I can imagine that sometimes it's re-formulated or that there is original content there (obviously) this is a copyright infringement since the wiki's license is CC-BY-SA, so you have to credit the original editors by adding a notice somewhere linking back to the source, something like this, it's our work that you are using after all. You can copy whatever you want, but if you do that you have to credit the original editors (but in case the content is too small or you renew it)
  • You said that there was some content here copied from your wiki, though I don't know if that's template can be really thought as "original" since tons of wiki have something similar (is like saying we copied the infoboxes form other wikis, these are common templates and have many similarity. The code was probably copied as you said, but since it's something pretty simple there isn't really a "creator", we can still credit you of course). There can be content copied here, but since we have a large community the most of it is surely original.
  • You want to add here the links to Wikki, but I don't see any links back on your wiki.
  • You found some links to other fandoms, I think there shouldn't be any links to fan-sites but in really special cases. This is to be fair to anyone, there are literally tons of sites on one piece so if someone add a link to his site then why everybody else shouldn't? This can degenerate in too many and not interesting external links. I think there should be only official sites in that section, like Wikipedia (ok that's not really official) and official One Piece sites. The interwiki links are not the same, because they add a link to the same article in a different language. They have the same purpose of the interwiki links in Wikipedia, to navigate through the same wiki network (Wikia in this case). I am not against adding links just to Wikki, but to any fandom sites.
  • There is already a link to the wikki in the main page, I think that's enough. I don't see a reason to add a link to every article on the wiki.

The whole reason the the Wikki's wiki existent is to protest against Oasis, for a viewer that's not really important it's a matter more important to us editors. If you wanted to use this wiki to increase your SEO then you should read this article, the external links are not followed by the crawlers anyway. leviathan_89 13:25, 28 February, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Leviathan 89. It almosts seems like spam to have a link to the same external site on every page. I think the one on the main page is enough. It's not like we link all of our articles or forums to related entries on Arlong Park, and we promote that about as much as we do the wikkii, with a link on the main page, and ok possibly 1 or 2 links in forums. Also, it was never really a community decision. You just added the links and no one seemed to mind at the time since a few of us were on the fence about changing over. I'll admit even I was unsure. The only other English wiki sites we have links to that are not on the main page are to characters on the Dragon Ball and Toriko wikis on the crossover pages, and most of the externals, save for a few, are to Wikipedia. All of those links are purely for the sake of providing more information to the reader. I really don't believe in being promotional of external sites like this. Preferential treatment seems unfair.DancePowderer Talk 14:49, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Agee with Leviathan and DP. They mentioned all the important reasons, but this one stands out in my opinion: "Preferential treatment seems is unfair". The wikki page doesn't seem to offer anything different from the wiki(a), compared to the "foreign language" wikias. Jinbe  Talk  15:02, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

the ttrouble is the content was moved over but the editors didn't mvfe with it like we should have done. I didn't fancy myself having two wikias to work from. The wikkia was falling behind production of the wikia last time I saw and its even up ont he top of search lists on google most of the time like this wiki is. I supported its efforts becuse I miss Oasis, but its now a forgotten and lost cause (I still use monobook). >_< One-Winged Hawk 22:21, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
By the way this wiki doesn't have even a theme for monobook, if you guys want I can help creating a theme like I did here. And maybe you meant "monaco" since oasis is the new skin. On Google I generally found One Piece wikki way behind us. leviathan_89 22:44, 28 February, 2012 (UTC)

I guess you do have a point in it being a competition of sorts. However, I'm at best trying to provide something that wikia apparently didn't provide at the time. I'm not trying to compete with you guys. I just want to provide a proper wiki to help people understand things about One Piece. If it resembles a competition, it's only because they are both wikis with similar subject matters.

I didn't know that wikia now provides an option that resembles wikipedia. However given the track record I've had with outside parties in control of thing like with Wikipedia, I don't know if I can trust a host system run by such guys.

The wikkii indeed seems to be copied, but that's only because the several hundred or so articles have not been modified. For some newer ones, I've been trying my best to make them as different as the one in here. For others however, the task is however a bit too daunting hence the copying. This is also why I ask for the links just for the slight chance that somebody new would come along and provide something different as well. As for the copy right infringement thing, do we really need to go that far? I've got enough of a problem with the other site without this. Must I place a disclaimer on every article that bears a similarity to one here else I should I don't know, remove them? I mean SOPA much?

For the Featured template, I'm pretty sure that it's of my design as it bears a extreme similarity to what I've made. However, I'll let that slide.

There are links on the wikkii that link back to here such as the ones in Hody Jones, Otohime, Surume, Fishman Karate, Sanji's Fighting Style, Sanji, Brook, One Piece x Toriko Crossover, Usopp, and Yomi Yomi no Mi. There's just not alot because I'm busy at maintaining the site and other things. This also raises another point, I don't want a buttload of external links linking to the wikkii. I'm not asking you to link every single page here to the wikkii. Just the a few that might give a chance for an visitor or two. If you guys don't like them that much and see them simply as spam, I can compromise and just ask for the ones that were removed. I won't add any other than those few if you guys are that nitpicky. I just want a few pages that probably won't make that much of a blip on your radar.

The one link to the wikkii in the main page, that maybe enough. However, that doesn't give that much of a chance for someone stumbling in and discovering the wikkii. I'm asking for a few pages in a large 1000+ page wiki to have a link to the wikkii. It would be like the proverbial needle in the haystack if you will. However if you just allow just one link, well you're just making the needle smaller and the haystack bigger.

Not sure if this was directed to the discussion but the wikkii does have a monobook option, just not one that can be easily assessed by anyone.

As for updating the site itself, I'm trying the best I can to update it without copying. However, it is just a big task. Which is why I'm once again asking for the links in order to get help. As for google, I'm really not trying at the moment to achieve all mighty search prosperity. All I'm trying to do is to make a wiki. Is it not better than wikia? Fine. Is wikia a better source for One Piece? Fine. I'm all fine that. I'm just not fine that this wikia won't give a chance more than just one link.Mugiwara Franky 02:02, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Look if you are linking the wikki thats like linking yourself. What can they find there that they can't really find here, besides the different skin. I am against the links because I think they are unneccessary.  Tuckyd  Idea Station  Hi There  02:27, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Okay I get that they're like linking to myself and that they're unnecessary to an article as I whole. However all I'm asking is just allow a few links back just for the small chance that somebody might come in and help out. Also what can they find is a site that they can suggest skins, functions, and other stuff that could make their wiki experience enjoyable if they just try. They can get that if they want because the editor in charge of that is a One Piece fan like them. You can't do that here because ultimately its up to the main guys at wikia who at times can be distant to the regular joe of a regular wiki. Like a skin design, wikia decides what you should like based on the opinion of thousands of people who may or may not have the same interests as you. Your opinion is not something that directly addressed.
At wikkii, your voice can be heard and what you want will be what you get based on a community of liked minded individuals. At the moment, that function is not in full use due to the fact that nobody is around to be a community. In order to probably help that problem, the links could aid that in what little way they could.Mugiwara Franky 02:55, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
I am going to be completely frank with my thoughts here. These links are unnecessary. I don't see anything that is shown in wikkii that is not offered here in greater detail. This entire thing sounds like you are just trying to promote your wikkii, which seems idiotic to me. If you don't like the new skin or whatever, then don't edit here. Are you just trying to get people to go to your wikkii? PX15.. 03:01, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
I don't know if you've been reading but yes I've been asking for links to promote the wikii. I want a small number of links in the off chance that somebody would stumble and help out the wikii. If that isn't enough clear promotion then it's settled. So just please stop repeating the same argument said by other people cause I will still counter it with what I've been saying.
I indeed don't like the new skin but that does not mean that this site and the wikkii can't be partner sites. We can still be partners in what small way. As part of that partnership, all I ask is for a small number of links to be posted. Not alot, just a small number.
As for necessity, sure the links don't provide anything new that hasn't been said. But at least they provide an opportunity for some light. I could provide something else at the site but only if people come in and voice their concerns. However in order to do that, the links would have to be here.
I really don't see what you guys have against a small number of links existing when all they do is simply link externally to a different site. You have no qualms about the other external links. So why must you be solely against what I've added?Mugiwara Franky 03:35, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

I have been observing this for a while, and curiosity got the better of me and I ended up at the Wikkii to take a look at things. From there, I noticed several matters that I don't quite understand:

  • While I am aware that MF was once active here, hence no surprise, but I saw MasterDeva and DancePowderer (user name) there as well. Does this mean that DP and Deva provide assistance to the Wikkii (in their spare time perhaps)?
  • I took a look at the history page of Punk Hazard on both sites, and a certain the history log record were identical between both sites. And those identical log records were done by users PX15, Yata, Tucky, Evan which I thought exists in the Wikia only. Its too coincidental to be a "coincidence", so does this mean one site was copying the other (even down to the historical log pages)?

I wish to state that I am new in the world of wiki (ever), so I may not be aware that there may be wiki programs or clauses which allows two pages to be linked and sync each other, or similar. Also, I am just only enquiring on the above matters, not so much as questioning (which may be a more serious tone).

Is there anyone who can enlighten me please? And upfront I sincerely apologise if the above are a general normal in the world of wiki which I have been living under a rock for so long without a clue on this.

- AY - 10:25, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

MF copies not only the contents, but also the history. Which makes Levi's "copyright infringement" accusations invalid, since authors are precisely credited. sff9 10:56, February 29, 2012

I see... probably he uses the import/export page function, which copy the entire history page, hence all the users who edited on that page are consequentially created on the Wikki. @MF when I talked about the skins I was talking about this wiki. About the featured template I'll add the source, you "don't have let it slide", just edit and add a simply sentence like "this template is based on <link>". The main point of the discussion, as someone already said, is that the wikki isn't really such a different alternative, the whole skin problem is a matter more important to the editors than a simple viewer, a random visitor looks for informations that's all. For the editor here who don't like oasis they can use monobook (though in this wiki there isn't any customization yet). About the links, as I said I don't think is fair to let only you add the links, but maybe we can compromise by adding your links only on the main characters or something like that. leviathan_89 12:16, 29 February, 2012 (UTC)
The featured template I really can let slide cause if you guys are using something that originated from the wikii regardless of permission it makes me happy since it means what I'm doing at the wikkii actually caught somebody's eye to emulate. What would get me mad though is if you guys would use it and not at least give me some of the external links I'm asking for.
The customization thing is something I'm kinda offering at wikkii. Apart from Vector and Monobook, there's all the old skins that were used when wikia was still basic. Also due to the setup, I could customize the backgrounds to something that would be adequate to people's taste.
For the skin thing being only for an editor, that may not be totally true. Just speaking as a viewer myself, when I look for information the site at which I look for the information can have an impact as well. A site that provides info with a format one can get easily use to be better than a site with a format one can't easily get use to. This is kinda the problem I have with viewing pages on wikia whether they're of one piece or not. The whole wikipedia format has given me somewhat of a muscle memory and wikia's just giving me a somewhat of a headache. There's the monobook option but unless there's more than one skin that uses that format, it kinda still puts me off.
Adding my links on just the main characters is actually a compromise I can have since they're considered hot spots. Who you guys consider as main characters can be up to you guys. Whether they just be the Straw Hats or some other main characters included, it really doesn't matter. Just as long as there's a slight chance that it would help the wikkii out.Mugiwara Franky 13:18, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
I still don't like the idea of advertising, even on a few pages. We shouldn't give external sites special treatment like that. The OP wikia never chose to be affiliated with the OP wikkii. We're separate sites connected through but one person. We aren't required to help the site, nor were we asked when the links went up in the first place. I see the whole thing as somewhat intrusive to be perfectly honest. This is nothing against Mugiwara Franky or the wikkii. I'd say this same thing about any other site.DancePowderer Talk 06:35, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
The OP wikia is affiliated with the OP wikii by the fact of its origin and similar content. The two sites maybe separate but it can't be totally separate due to again its origin and content. Think of it like Wikipedia and this site. When Wikipedia made this site's original editors move to here, the site became separate. However, the site still affiliates with wikipedia for content and such because of its origins. What I'm doing is nothing different from what you guys are doing by affiliating with wikipedia for every single topic that can't be covered here. It's also not different from people from other language wikis affiliating their sites with this one.
Sure you can say the other wikis provide different language as everyone's been pointing out and that's a valid point. But when it comes down to it, it's just the same info. However if they can be inter-affiliated and such, Why can't the wikii be? Is there a rule that says two same speaking sites providing the same info can't be affiliated.
I believe I asked for some help when I started with the wikii. However, due to whatever, people just didn't felt like they should invest in another site. I respect that you guys will not give a crap about even helping out at the site. But if you're not going to help out at the site, at least let it have some links.
You say intrusive in what way? The one who's asking for this was a previous editor who gave alot in this site's creation. It's not some out of the spur third party who doesn't know the rules. It's me who is asking. Okay, you can say it's intrusive because I'm not contributing anything else to this site. However, doesn't what I contributed before amount to anything.
The compromise from Leviathan_89 at it's basics means I can at least have 9 external links based on the 9 main characters. With the external link also on the front page, that makes 10. 10 is a pretty small number and is I believe smaller than the number of links I originally placed on this site prior the bot eradicating them all. 10 is as far as I can go but it is a good deal I am giving you guys. I am giving you guys a very good deal. They are small links that people can easily miss, no different from the thousands of interwiki links you have.
I mean just allow this tiny matter to be allowed so you can concentrate on other things like the buttload of info Oda gave in Blue Deep.Mugiwara Franky 07:33, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
This issue does not detract focus from incoming data. Furthermore, Wikipedia is not the best example of an external affiliation. Wikia was founded by people at Wikipedia as a sort of splinter cell. It would be like saying Wikkii is not affiliated with the AWA. I can only see this becoming a slippery slope. If we let you leave links, then someone else will want to, and then someone else, and so on and so on. Links to other sites like that just seem out of place on a page too. It seems like a shameless plug above all else. What makes you think that those links will even make a difference? If they didn't before, why would they now? We might as well post links to fanfic sites on the Devil Fruit and pirate crew pages at this rate.DancePowderer Talk 08:04, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
One Piece Wikkii likewise can be seen like a splinter cell to this site. It split like how most wikias split from wikipedia. However that didn't stop wikia from still being associated with wikipedia in one form or another. So why can't the Wikkii splinter cell of this site still be associated with this site one way or another?
Wikkii, the host site itself, is not affiliated with the Anti-Wikia Alliance. It was made before the Anti-Wikia Alliance as far as I can tell. It was suggested by the Anti-Wikia Alliance to its members and other people who were threatened by wikia change. Stop saying Wikkii, the host site, is a part of the Anti-Wikia Alliance because a whole lot of other host sites were suggested as well and they too were made before the alliance.
If someone else decides to post other links then it depends on the content of those links if they should warrant a stay or not. If they link to information relative to the article then they should stay. If they link to say a porn site then they should be taken out. It all depends on content.
There are links to other sites that are allowed such as the other language links. As long as they are placed at places like at the bottom of the page or somewhere where they don't bother the main article, they don't look all that out of place.
I think that they would help because this site is currently the most reliable wiki about one piece. Having at least some links has the slight chance that someone would stumble across them and help out at the Wikii. It is a small chance I want to take. Also I would also like the wikii site to be affiliated with this site for association sake.
You keep associating the external links I am asking for as something similar to fanfics or something like them. Why do you keep doing that DancePowderer? Yes it can be said to be a fansite as it is made by a fan. But it is also a free wiki that anyone can edit if they give it a chance. Also there were no arguments about any of the other external links before. Why are you against these ones just because of the Anti-Wikia Alliance and etc? They cause you no harm and considering that the compromise that Leviathan_89 has made means they would cause you less than that.Mugiwara Franky 09:28, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Still agree with MF. In particular I disagree with this sentence "If we let you leave links, then someone else will want to, and then someone else, and so on and so on": it's really a special case here. Come on, even after one year of absence, MF is still the second guy with the most edits here. It's not just anybody, I mean, we can make an exception without worrying that it would create a precedent. Yes, his demand is a bit awkward per se, but it will do no harm. sff9 11:56, March 3, 2012

Personally, aside from the reasons I have already stated I'm more against adding them simply because I don't like having more wikis on the same matter. I believe that's will only be counter productive since it splits the viewers, the editors and double the work (if anyone edit on both). That said maybe I can compromise with a only selected "hot spots". leviathan_89 12:02, 3 March, 2012 (UTC)

Well it seems everyone has mixed feelings about this, so far the options are

  • Allow the links to the wikki, they will be treated as the other external links.
  • Allow the links only to the main characters (Which? I'd say straw hats members and crew page)
  • Not allowing them in the articles.

So if anyone has other options, please say them. leviathan_89 12:02, 3 March, 2012 (UTC)

You meant the main crew page also. I thought you meant just the 9 Straw Hats but okay. It's also a hot spot and it's still a compromise I'm willing to go for either way. I get just a few but frequently visited pages and you guys get the other hundred thousand.Mugiwara Franky 13:59, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with DancePowderer, the external links section is for extra information that can't fit into the article, not for advertising. Bastian964 20:01, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

So I think we will have to vote on this, let's give another day and then let's open the poll. leviathan_89 22:07, 3 March, 2012 (UTC)

You forgot the option of removing the link from the main page as well.  Jinbe  Talk  23:03, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm... that wasn't in question though... it can be discussed in the main page's talk page or not? leviathan_89 23:18, 3 March, 2012 (UTC)

It's exactly the same "problem", isn't it? Even if Sff9 disregards the argument, I still think it isn't right to give special treatment to certain pages. It is a matter of principle, even if no one else will ever ask to get his page linked. Jinbe  Talk  23:32, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

The link on the main page is fine. We have other external links on there, like to AP and a few other places. I don't mind it there. Bastian is right. The external links section is for superfluous information that doesn't fit into the article, like the flowers for each individual Kuja member or vulcanization on Luffy's Abilities and Powers page. It's not to advertise other sites. Keeping externals to wikkii up would be no different than putting a link to the Devil Fruit section of the fanfic wiki on the Devil Fruit pages. It doesn't do anything for the article or the benefit of the reader. Unless the wikkii site has information on characters that is completely different from ours in single every way, I see no reason to have them up.DancePowderer Talk 02:30, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

If you're talking about superfluous information then isn't giving another copy of the same information considered superfluous.
While they can be seen as advertising why not try seeing them as similar to interwiki links. Connections between two associated sites. Many sites do it in one way or another. Why not do this way for this site and the wikkii site in this way?
You once again keep associating the wikii I maintain as no different than fanfic sites and other such things. Do you really think that such sites will flood in the moment you agree to the external links? Is it that beyond the capacity of anyone to investigate whether an external link added is legitimate or not? Besides do external links in this site pop up every day? I don't know but I'm pretty sure they don't.
Speaking of fanon, I remember that Angel once put up links to a OP fan wiki on some pages for what I guess is for people to write fanon somewhere else. I don't know if they're still around but if they are and nobody's made a big deal of them yet, well parts of what you're arguing for DancePowderer maybe hypocritical.
For readers necessity. What exactly do you want for the pages at the wikkii to have in order to be considered worthy of being linked to this site. Do you really want them in another language or something like that? However, if it's content you're actually talking about I will present to you an example that this site is not doing so well compared to the wikkii. I am currently updating and expanding Luffy's history in Skypiea as seen here. A work in progress but I often don't leave it sitting around for too long. And here I present to you this site's same history section which I see that no one's been developing.
What I'm trying to say is the wikkii has an editor willing to rewrite, reorganize, reference, and develop past information so it won't look like a lump of information lumped together haphazardly. People write information on new chapters and people but almost nobody cares about past sections that happened. Well I care, and that care is in the wikkii. That is what the wikkii is offering. Information that new comers to One Piece would understand better. If you guys have an editor like me who does that here then whoop de doo, I'm at a lost. However, if you don't then my work at the wikkii can be what I offer to readers here.
All I'm asking for is a few external links here. Links that don't bother people and can be easily overlooked. You do not have to make layway for other links if something like this happens again in the future. I mean you can let one man avoid execution because new evidence says he's innocent. Does that mean every man after him avoids execution? Try seeing this situation as an individual case instead of the generalization of what may happen in the future. You guys don't like advertising other sites, I get it. But please look at my case here and what I've been arguing for the past week.Mugiwara Franky 03:18, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

First off, let me clarify. I wasn't comparing the wikkii to a fanfic site, it was purely for the sake of example. I never saw any links to the fanfic site on other pages, so I'm guessing they were removed sometime ago. Even as an individual case, I still don't agree with having your externals on article pages, no matter how few. The way I see it, you left the wiki, a lot of other people were thinking something similar. You left the links on the pages to tell people about the move. The new site fell through while the wiki continued to do just fine and you stayed on wikkii to maintain it. Seeing as the new site wasn't what the majority thought of going to, people seemed to be able to tolerate the new wiki setup and the wiki prospered and slowly but surely severed its connections to the wikkii. I don't see how that obligates us to help promote your site. You decided to leave, and therefore you decided to be on your own.DancePowderer Talk 03:52, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Okay you have some points there I guess. However even if you guys are not obligated to promote the site, at least let the external links stay. Whether or not it helps the wikkii is debatable. Just let them stay for the sake that there is connection between the two. At least to show that there is still something between them.
Yes I decided to leave but I thought people would join as well based on what I've heard. I was wrong I admit. However, I am still offering a hand even if no one is willing to accept it. You guys do not need to accept what I'm offering but please do not take away the hand that I have been offering.
As for prospering, I don't know. The site may be up to date and have several new pages. However, I'm not sure on quality in some areas. That's my opinion though.Mugiwara Franky 04:47, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

In my opinion, since since wikia and wikkii have their own styles and technically run on their own leagues, we shouldn't have external links to interconnect. After all, for Zeldapedia and Zelda Wiki, they refuse to even have information sourced from the opposite site. Not that I'm arguing about strengthening the bonds and sharing information, but if we do interconnect, we could have trouble such as one site having different information than the other, and both sites eventually clashing with each other, leading to an edit war of sites due to both sides wanting competition (we say we don't want to compete, but we end up doing so anyways). Besides, if one site has to offer the same ideas as the other, then why bother going to the other site to look it up when they are both the same? Yata Talk to me 04:59, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

For the case of differing information it can't be helped. However, considering we are looking at the same main source, the difference may not be that big. So one site prefers one way of naming characters or interpreting events. While it maybe bothersome, when it comes down to it, it's up the reader themselves to see which they prefer.
For inter site edit wars, I really don't think it'll come to it. Given the small amount of external links I'm asking, I don't think what I do at the wikkii would have that much of an impact on this site. As for causing problems at the wikkii, that maybe unlikely considering its current situation. However if an edit war comes from the two sites being connected, I'll be sure to defend the right for each site to be different.
As for the same ideas, it may come to perspective. One site may say this is this in one way. The other site may also say this is also this but in another way. Given two perspectives instead of just one, readers may get a bigger picture of the idea. I don't know it's complicated.Mugiwara Franky 05:27, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Shall we vote then? leviathan_89 22:58, 4 March, 2012 (UTC)

Might as well.DancePowderer Talk 08:21, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

I suppose so I guess since arguments at this point may start going around in circles. However just to make things simple since I accepted your compromise, Leviathan_89, it'll be just a vote between your compromise and no external links at all. The compromise is good deal as I can see it. The number of pages that have the links are relatively fewer than what they were before so that's good for you guys. And those pages are hot spots so that's good enough for me as opposed to random pages.Mugiwara Franky 14:27, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

Let's include every options just to be fair and of course you have the right to vote (if you may think it wasn't fair for you to vote since you are the one asking to add the links). Ah, side note: it's quite funny that your main page logo say "Wikia, if you please" which was our old logo. leviathan_89 20:23, 5 March, 2012 (UTC)
I will repeat- The links provide no benefit to our wikia therefore should not be there.  Tuckyd  Idea Station  Hi There  01:31, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
@Leviathan_89 Thanks for your concern I guess. For the logo, that's one of the many things that's been on my list of changing but never got around doing since there are other things to be done like updating pages.
@Tuckyd Yes you have expressed your argument that they provide no benefit to wikia. So I'm going to repeat some of my arguments to counter yours, I wish to place the links in same vein as links to different language links are added to pages. They will provide users with a site with less restrictions than wikia does. They will provide users with a site that can give a different perspective on the subject of One Piece. They will provide an interwiki connection between two sites similar to how certain other sites affiliate with one another.Mugiwara Franky 03:44, March 6, 2012 (UTC)

One argument against it is that it was created as part of a protest against the new template; we should really be considered "neutral" grounds. This has always been my ultimate reason for not really switching sites. Should we really link to something meant to be a protest? Its hard for me to explain why in great detail, but if we link to a anti-war wikia, or a pro-life wikia, is it any different? I know the subject and content are the same but the cause has always seperated one wiki from another. :-/ One-Winged Hawk 22:46, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

You guys can still be neutral grounds. I'm just asking for a few links just in support for a site. Not idea that created the site but the site itself.
I admit I made the site in protest, however it can be more than a protest if people can give it a chance. The site also was meant in protest against the host site wikia not this site itself. They can still be connected despite different host sites.
While it maybe the middle of voting session, I just have to say though it's somewhat clear how a majority of people of seeing my site. It kinda looks like a losing battle however it could still turn around. Still I gotta ask, it wasn't a big deal when they were first around. It only took a rather back alley conversation and a non-human bot to take them off. Now that the links are being asked to be placed back in a formal forum, a majority of people are saying that they should not be included even when they didn't expressed the need in the first place in the previous discussion.
I don't know. Maybe I'm just losing more faith in Wikia. First the top guys won't listen to those who don't like their ideas and now those who use their system won't even help out a fellow wiki user on the basis of host site and such. I don't know, I gave you guys irreplaceable time when I was editing here but you won't just give me a few links. I don't know. I just don't know.
If this falls out and my request is not voted through, at least keep the one link on the front page for me. You guys use and modify all I've written here. I think it should be fair that people should know where the author of alot stuff here is continuing cause it's still apart of this site's history.Mugiwara Franky 04:48, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Poll

Requirements to vote: edits >300 and time on this wiki >3 month. The poll will expire at the 00:00 of 12 march 2012.

Should links to One Piece Wikki be included in our articles in the external links section?
  • No.
  1.  Tuckyd  Idea Station  Hi There  20:30, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  2. PX15.. 22:16, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  3. DancePowderer Talk 22:22, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Yata Talk to me 22:24, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  5.   ☆ MDM ☆ (◕‿◕)   23:25, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  6. 海賊-姫 00:00, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
  7. uknownada Talk 05:27, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
  8. leviathan_89 12:36, 7 March, 2012 (UTC)
  9. One-Winged Hawk 22:42, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  10.  Jinbe  Talk  14:00, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes.
  1.  Fanta Talk  20:41, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  2. sff9 20:50, March 5, 2012
  3.   Troll King                          21:49, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  4. The Humaniod Typhoon Talkco
  5.  Blackened D. Soul  Talk  23:19, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Mugiwara Franky 03:35, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
  7. LPKWhat?19:54,3/7/2012
If yes, in which articles?
  • Only the Straw Hat members page and the Straw Hat pirates crew page (9 + 1, other pages must be discussed first)
  1. Mugiwara Franky 03:35, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • No restrictions.
  1.  Fanta Talk  20:41, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  2. sff9 20:50, March 5, 2012
  3. The Humaniod Typhoon Talkco
  4.   Troll King                          22:09, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
  5.  Blackened D. Soul  Talk  22:15, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

Results

Time's up. In a 10 to 7, we will not have external links. Yata Talk to me 02:37, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.