One Piece Wiki
Tag: sourceedit
Tag: sourceedit
Line 36: Line 36:
   
 
I don't necessarily think we must delete it, but I won't oppose it. {{User:JustSomeDude.../Sig}} 23:56, February 14, 2015 (UTC)
 
I don't necessarily think we must delete it, but I won't oppose it. {{User:JustSomeDude.../Sig}} 23:56, February 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
  +
You guys, deleting this is not a good idea. The reason why it's outdated is because most of you are lazy not to update it and I'm not responsible to update it. This tells the history of this site and it's very important. Every damn wiki has it, why can't we?
  +
  +
[[User:Joekido|Joekido]] ([[User talk:Joekido|talk]]) 00:29, February 15, 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:29, 15 February 2015

2010

Not sure who writes these out (whoever you are, good job, reading this I learned a lot about this site's history, and thought it was very interesting). And I thought I might help out by making some notes on things I've noticed, that might be worth mentioning when 2010 is written out. Organise it however you like. Anyone else is free to add your own notes. YazzyDream 07:02, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

  • The now infamous image glitch.
  • Major issues of using manga v. anime images.
  • Influx of editors? I don't know about this since I've only joined this year. (Haha, there you go!) But it certainly feels like we've been getting more editors lately?
  • Archiving a lot of pages.
  • Major changes to the front page and it's templates.

Bump...

So, anyone confident enough to update this article? We've gotten our spotlight, chat (created by one of our users), new admins, new web layout, top 3, and a lot more that isn't on here. JapaneseOPfan :: Talk 19:45, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Bumping the bump. We should figure out what to do with this. JustSomeDude...  Talk | 02:02, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

See other articles with disputed talk pages. Hey! Let's talk this out!

This is an active talk page. Please participate if you wish to make changes to the subject at hand. Remember to remain calm and civil throughout the discussion!

This page is terribly outdated and nobody is willing to update it. And nobody reads this page anyway. i think we should delete it.  Staw-Hat Luffy  Talk  17:16, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Many wikia site has similer pages, why can't we? And why don't you update it?

Joekido (talk) 18:49, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Well, I can't update it. I'm pretty new and most of our active users are new. You've been here since the site opened, why don't you update it?  Staw-Hat Luffy  Talk  22:05, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

I already did

Joekido (talk) 22:07, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

I added more but I don't know much about the wiki's past. If an older user is willing to edit it, please do.  Staw-Hat Luffy  Talk  18:57, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

All right, guys, I think it's time for us to decide whether we should delete this page, since it's largely redundant, and is severely outdated. If we're not going to delete this page, then at the very least, we ought to update it, which means we'd have to decide what events are important enough to be included in this page (the Great Galaxy9000 vandalism, anybody? haha), and so on....

Personally, I'm all for deleting this page, why should we have it? It serves absolutely no purpose at all, is severely outdated, and in need of a massive rewording.  Jademing  Talk   23:51, February 14, 2015 (UTC)

Nobody cares, and no one person is well-versed enough to update it. It's a lot of effort when we have so much actual OP content to update.

I don't necessarily think we must delete it, but I won't oppose it. JustSomeDude...  Talk | 23:56, February 14, 2015 (UTC)

You guys, deleting this is not a good idea. The reason why it's outdated is because most of you are lazy not to update it and I'm not responsible to update it. This tells the history of this site and it's very important. Every damn wiki has it, why can't we?

Joekido (talk) 00:29, February 15, 2015 (UTC)