Trivia are not supposed to mention unnecessary stuff. Only the name is supposed to be mentioned. Especially in this case since that legend doesn't even exist. SeaTerror (talk) 19:35, January 22, 2018 (UTC)
How is it unnecessary when Oda explicitly noted down that legend? It should be explained what it is. If you say only the name of the bird, then you won't understand the reason behind. I didn't even know that legend for example. And why the legend doesn't exist?
I didn't even see that note since it wasn't part of the original note. I fixed that. It should also be referenced. Also the legend does not actually exist anyway. https://tinyurl.com/y85rc9aw SeaTerror (talk) 17:10, January 23, 2018 (UTC)