Name[]
I don't understand how this doesn't have an official name. I took it directly from the 672 raw, and I don't see how "Tanker SAD" would make change it. If anything, that means it should be moved to "SAD (ship)". We have the Marine Ships page, so wouldn't this be a similar case? Help me out here.DancePowderer Talk 19:55, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
I dunno... why not ask Klobis on why he deemed the "translation" invalid? Yata Talk to me 05:53, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
SADのタンカー (tanker of SAD) is not a ship's name. So I said it does not have an official name. But I do not think this page should be deleted. --Klobis (talk) 03:20, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
So, what we could do is move it to Tanker and make it similar to the Marine Ships article by cutting some stuff down to make it a bit more general. Would that work?DancePowderer Talk 03:28, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
Why not just add it to the Donquixote Pirates page like we do with the Heart Pirates? ••PX15..•• 03:37, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
If any page, SAD would be the page to put this on. Galaxy 9000 03:42, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
@DP, that would work, except that we have virtually nothing to say about SAD tankers in general… This page is all about this specific ship.
In my opinion, conjectural-titled articles are not that big of a deal. There is enough content for it to stay. sff9 12:42, January 19, 2013
I like the idea of merging it with SAD, since it's not a specific ship but a type of ship that carries SAD. leviathan_89 12:52, 19 January, 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, nevermind, only the history section is about this specific ship. So I like DP's solution the best. The name "SAD tanker" is official for a type of ship. sff9 13:20, January 19, 2013
Yeah, DP's solution makes sense. If we find out the specific ship's name, then we can just add it as a subsection to the general Tanker page. JustSomeDude... Talk | 15:54, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
But if I'm not mistaken, this is (and probably will be) the only tanker shown, so a "Tanker" page isn't it the same as this one? I think merging it with SAD page is more fitting, since this is the ship used to transport it. It's like when we leave the unknown ships in the crew's pages. leviathan_89 17:32, 19 January, 2013 (UTC)
Agreed. Merging it with the SAD page seems to be the best option right now. ••PX15..•• 18:39, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
I can agree with merging it, but I still feel like we should do something separate with it as a ship type, either give it its own page or make a tanker section on the Ships page.DancePowderer Talk 03:53, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
We could add a section under the Ships page, in addition to a section on the SAD page. ••PX15..•• 04:46, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
So do we can this page or redirect it? And if we do redirect it, which page should we go to?DancePowderer Talk 04:50, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
- If there's a section on the ships page as well as the SAD page, the redirect should go to the SAD page. People are more likely to want to see the stuff about the gas it transports than the information about the ship itself. JustSomeDude... Talk | 04:52, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Then wouldn't they just search for SAD? I think it should go to the ships page.DancePowderer Talk 07:18, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
Agreed with JSD, actual section on the SAD page and section w/redirect on the ship page (and on the Donquixote Pirates' page?). sff9 21:20, January 20, 2013
Sounds good. Should we redirect it now? Yata Talk to me 23:01, January 21, 2013 (UTC)