Tag: rte-source |
m (Awaikage moved page Talk:Sola (Disambiguation) to Talk:Sora (Disambiguation) without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Aurora had already fixed that two minutes before that post and "Sora" was not even on that disambiguation page.--[[User:Robertg27|Robertg27]] ([[User talk:Robertg27|talk]]) 21:18, June 30, 2017 (UTC) |
Aurora had already fixed that two minutes before that post and "Sora" was not even on that disambiguation page.--[[User:Robertg27|Robertg27]] ([[User talk:Robertg27|talk]]) 21:18, June 30, 2017 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ''"If there's more than one character with a name that might be spelled the same or spelled in a similar way, we have a page to show that we're aware of that and list the characters in a ambiguous manner."'' - shouldn't it be more then two? Because if there are only two, then {{T|For}} is enough to cover them. {{User:Leviathan_89/sig3|21:21|30|June|2017}} |
||
Latest revision as of 16:02, 12 December 2017
Mermaid
What about the mermaid Sora.--Robertg27 (talk) 20:10, June 30, 2017 (UTC)
I left her in there cuz the japanese spelling is the same. Aurora[1] | Yes? 20:13, June 30, 2017 (UTC)
Then shouldn't it be changed to just Sora.--Robertg27 (talk) 20:22, June 30, 2017 (UTC)
You don't get how disambiguation pages work, do you. If there's more than one character with a name that might be spelled the same or spelled in a similar way, we have a page to show that we're aware of that and list the characters in a ambiguous manner.
It's recommended to throw away socks after a year 21:02, June 30, 2017 (UTC)
Aurora had already fixed that two minutes before that post and "Sora" was not even on that disambiguation page.--Robertg27 (talk) 21:18, June 30, 2017 (UTC)
"If there's more than one character with a name that might be spelled the same or spelled in a similar way, we have a page to show that we're aware of that and list the characters in a ambiguous manner." - shouldn't it be more then two? Because if there are only two, then {{For}} is enough to cover them. {{leviathan_89 | 21:21, 30 June, 2017 (UTC)}}