One Piece Wiki

Archive 1 · 2 · 3 · 4


Re:Character Infoboxes

Just copy-paste an existing one, and change the data. Rhavkin (talk) 04:06, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

If any user have problems with anything that is worth keeping, the wiki as a community will help fix them. Rhavkin (talk) 09:41, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

Leo (Non-Canon)

My bad if I made it confusing, but what I meant was that, normally if two characters have the same name, the other is distinguished by country or profession if possible. It stands out less than "Non-Canon."Nightmare Pirates (talk) 01:19, July 8, 2019 (UTC)

As an example, Race (Non-Canon) was moved to Race (Character) because the reason used by Kaido was "Better, more informative title." Same with Leo, cook is more informative than non-canon.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 01:28, July 8, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Categories

Like who for example? Rhavkin (talk) 23:13, July 13, 2019 (UTC)

They are not "youth groups", they are groups of children. No need for special treatment due to group members age. Rhavkin (talk) 23:29, July 13, 2019 (UTC)

Did you read the Forum:Category Creation and Removal? If there are less then five pages, and it can be fitted in another category (like simply Organizations) there shouldn't be a separate category. And you can't force something into a category just so it'll fit, like calling the Usopp Pirates not real. Rhavkin (talk) 23:46, July 13, 2019 (UTC)

Being a pirate and being a criminal are two different things. By your logic, the Tontatta Pirates, Ideo Pirates and Yonta Maria Grand Fleet aren't pirates, and the Straw Hats crew weren't pirates until after Arlong Park. Rhavkin (talk) 00:54, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

As I said "Being a pirate and being a criminal are two different things". You just gave more examples that support my claim. Just accept that not all of your ideas for new categories are good nor acceptable after what has been decided in the forum. Not all notions pan out, this is life. Rhavkin (talk) 01:05, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

Actually you did, even if you didn't noticed. You said it yourself that Luffy and Zoro were labeled pirates but they didn't commit any crime at that time. I don't know what the Sai thing was about, he is a criminal, a self declared pirate, and was in Mary Geoise. How is that relate to pirates and criminals are different? And I don't have to accept anything that there aren't even evidences to support it. Rhavkin (talk) 01:29, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

A tree falls in the woods... Rhavkin (talk) 07:41, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

Re:Youth Groups

Like what? Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 20:06, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

You listed four pages. The required minimum is five, since those groups are already categorized under Organizations. There is also nothing significant about these groups consisting of children/teenagers. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 21:13, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

Not unless there is any significance in the ages of the members. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 00:31, July 15, 2019 (UTC)


You have been told, multiple times, not to make large changes to the history sections without discussing it first. In light of your actions this morning, you have been blocked for one week. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 14:02, July 15, 2019 (UTC)

What's wrong with discord? Still did you look at the edits before changing them this time around?Rgilbert27 (talk) 14:39, July 15, 2019 (UTC)

Mt. Atama Thieves

Rg, please stop remove "ep=" and qref names from references. They are important parts of references. Thanks. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 23:28, July 26, 2019 (UTC)

Groups Bounty

groups bounty references are one that list the bounty holder and their bounties, and a second that reference when the new became the current, which is usually by joining a crew or receiving a new bounty. Personal bounty references are in the characters page. Rhavkin (talk) 19:06, July 30, 2019 (UTC)

First of all, please don't redo edits while we are still talking about it. Now as for what we should do, for the I don't know how many time, if it is against what we've been doing so far, and there wasn't a talk about; START A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT IN A FORUM FIRST. Rhavkin (talk) 19:18, July 30, 2019 (UTC)

Are you serious? I am the one that should start a forum because you have an issue? And stop redoing the edits. I don't know what's the history of the Blackbeard Pirates, but one page being different doesn't mean all pages should be edited. If the only problem is the Blackbeard Pirates so a forum isn't needed, go to the page talk page. Rhavkin (talk) 19:36, July 30, 2019 (UTC)

I don't want to get into the Blackbeard Pirates topic, but either way, even the Straw Hats don't have individual bounty references. Rhavkin (talk) 20:16, July 30, 2019 (UTC)

So? Rhavkin (talk) 20:53, July 30, 2019 (UTC)

Still doesn't change the fact we don't use personal bounty references. Rhavkin (talk) 21:38, July 30, 2019 (UTC)

You're being very rude. I'm trying to explain your mistakes so you won't repeat them, and you don't have to replay to the messages as soon as you receive them, that's on you to make your scheduled with other project, and it's not like I can guess what you're doing at any time. Go head and what you want, it will still be undo and you will eventually be banned again.

And the Straw Hats don't have personal bounty references, just like any other crew. Rhavkin (talk) 21:59, July 30, 2019 (UTC)


Your recent edit has been construed as vandalism. Please check our Vandalism Guidelines, and General Rules to avoid making further problems on the One Piece Wiki that could possibly lead to a ban. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Thank you.

Stop making more categories when nobody agrees with the ones you make. SeaTerror (talk) 18:57, August 15, 2019 (UTC)

Whole Cake Chateau Rooftop Characters had a consensus for deletion. It's part of the issue of category spam in general, which people are opposed to. Awaikage Talk 09:10, August 17, 2019 (UTC)

Another "confirm" issue

Your vandalism is for ignoring edit summary and constant disregard of wiki rules like you not referencing information you now where to find, while I simply, don't think the citation is necessary in Trivia section. So again, if YOU want to add the reference, YOU should be the one to do the whole work, and not have someone else do it for you. Just learn how to use Qref yourself. Rhavkin (talk) 20:46, August 25, 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I do know how to use it, but way should I use it for something you want to add? And if you think any reference should be on any page, just add it. Why can't you understand that the {{Confirm}} is for statements with no known source, and not for a missing {{Qref}}? Rhavkin (talk) 21:28, August 25, 2019 (UTC)

You read the manga and watch the anime. Rhavkin (talk) 04:55, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

You don't need to read the whole manga every year to fix your overusing {{confirm}} on Wano arc. Are you using {{confirm}} just to gain support for you binge idea? Rhavkin (talk) 05:04, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

If you want to fix any problem with any page, then fix it, don't create more works for someone else. Rhavkin (talk) 05:40, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

So it's a large task that will take sometime. Still, if YOU want to do it, YOU do the work. Rhavkin (talk) 05:56, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

You're going personal; it is not. I'm not saying I'm better, but why should I do the work for something you want to do? Rhavkin (talk) 06:12, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

No, I do not a source for cliff notes, just somewhat good memory. And the time you spend reading articles without referencing, adding {{confirm}}, and arguing, you could have reread whatever you wanted. Your last excuse was you wanted to watch the MCU films before the new one, and now you mention reading the Harry Potter books before the last one, It seem that you like rebingeing so why not do it in your own time. Rhavkin (talk) 06:38, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

Binge, in this case, has only one meaning: consecutive watching of a show till a certain point. You can also binge read with the same definition. Your idea for improving the pages is to binge the entire series? One saga at a time? One arc at a time? Fine, go ahead, don't drag user user into this. And my memory is not flaunted, it just help me roughly remember when each event occurred, and then I go to the source material and double check, confirm, pin point, and\or disprove the statement. Rhavkin (talk) 07:22, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

I stream it, and if you believe it can help go ahead and do it. Don't force others to do it for you. Rhavkin (talk) 07:54, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

Using the {{confirm}} instead of doing the work yourself forces other to reread\rewatch for the source. You can google search for "Watch One Piece online" and pick any site you want. Rhavkin (talk) 08:03, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Rider

My English is far from best, are you talking about a category for characters who rides on a vehicle or an animal? Rhavkin (talk) 16:03, August 28, 2019 (UTC)

But aren't like roughly 80% of the characters we've seen so far has ridden a boat? That is a massive category that doesn't give much. Rhavkin (talk) 20:29, August 28, 2019 (UTC)

Would you still include one time riders like the Straw Hats riding on the Super Spot-Billed Duck Troops? and you still didn't explain how this would help navigate the wiki. Which parent category were you thinking about adding this category to? are all reverent character already part of that category? Rhavkin (talk) 04:19, August 29, 2019 (UTC)

What number of times do you think is required to be part of the riders category? Does it even matter if the character rode in different styles like Sanji who have ridden on a SSBDT, the Puffin Tom, Cerberus, a Flaying Fish, Caesar balloon, Rabiyan... I don't see how Yagara riders are different from ship riders. Also neither of those are actually an "ability" someone learn. Riding a vehicle is also different from riding an animal since the animal do most of the work. Rhavkin (talk) 09:47, August 29, 2019

What you sent me refer only to steeds and two wheeled vehicles, from memory it means Smoker, Doc Q, Tonjit, Aokiji, generic Fire tank Pirates, Franky, Cavendish, Hawkins, Kin'emon, and Inuarashi. Now, how will this help navigate the wiki better? Rhavkin (talk) 10:57, August 29, 2019 (UTC)

The link you gave me has "One who rides, often on a horse or a motorcycle." If its anyone who even ridden anything, then the category is to vague, if it is by specific riding method, and all of then are in a larger "Riders" category it would be more easy to navigate, but you still didn't show any necessity for this category, nor relevant to an existing parent category. Rhavkin (talk) 12:17, August 29, 2019 (UTC)

The name is not the problem, is it needed? what problem does it solve? adding an additional category without benefit like downsizing an overcrowded existing category, or for a new power\ability users, and for the sole reason of having it existing is pointless. Not harmful or against the rules, but many users will object to it just becuse it has no real value. Rhavkin (talk) 13:16, August 29, 2019 (UTC)

It isn't a question of who can do it, it is a question about what makes "someone who rides an animal or a bike" into a raider fitting the category. Rhavkin (talk) 18:54, August 29, 2019 (UTC)

I agree with Rhavkin that such a category is unnecessary, since it is not an occupation and could potentially be applied to just about anyone. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 03:45, September 1, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Royal Guards

I know but this is more specific. Cracker-Kun (talk) 21:03, August 28, 2019 (UTC)

Re:Color Scheme

Sure. Do you have a list of topics that needs a CS? Do you have a specific colors in mind? Rhavkin (talk) 18:42, September 15, 2019 (UTC)

Why should Movie 1 have one if almost none of the other movies has one? And Mary Geoise is part of the World Government who has a color scheme. Rhavkin (talk) 03:45, September 16, 2019 (UTC)


I'm not sure if I have an opinion at the moment. Regardless, that was the original version. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 01:50, September 16, 2019 (UTC)


Capitalizing <references/> is a frivolous edit. It isn't correcting any mistake and doesn't contribute to the article in any meaningful way. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 04:05, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Re:One Piece Stampede Cast

I can count 90 books in the image, but it is hard to make out which volumes are they. Rhavkin (talk) 05:01, September 17, 2019 (UTC)

Chapter 691

The color spread for the chapter is four pages wide rather than the normal two. The events of the chapter start on page five, not three. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 00:27, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

Talk page, not edit war. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 20:29, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

Here is a site that has the chapter as it is printed in the volume. You can see it has been split into four pages. Rhavkin (talk) 20:53, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

You do realize this link also shows the color spread spanning four pages? The ToC also lists that Chapter 691 spans pages 7-27; that's 21 pages. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 21:38, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

As far as I know, VIZ do not change the page numbering and\or order, just text, but as Nesha linked above, the Japanese does show four pages. As for the magazine release, it would be nearly impossible to find a proper version so far back, and either way, even if the magazine did split it in two, the volume version that split it four ways is what we go by as we make final ruling based on that release. Rhavkin (talk) 21:47, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

Not unless there is a proof the magazine release has a different split. Rhavkin (talk) 21:57, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

Blogs from the time of the magazine issue's release mention a 4-page (4ページ?) spread: 1 2 Dragonus Nesha (talk) 22:07, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

Well its too late now, and who said there was a definite reason behind it? It is a four page color spread, end of story. There is no deeper reason for it to be four pages long just as there is no deeper reason for some chapters being 15, 17, or 19 pages long. Rhavkin (talk) 22:15, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

Also, if the only issue is the cover page, I think it has been well established that the number of pages is correct, and I will edit the section on the Cover Page page momentarily. Rhavkin (talk) 22:24, September 20, 2019 (UTC)

re:Beasts Pirates Lock

Unlocked it to allow info update. But if the trivia undergoes edit war again, I am locking it immediately. Yata Talk to me 00:59, September 28, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Dressrosa Images

I'll try, but I can't guarantee that I will. Do you know any specific episodes with good images of what you're requesting? I'd rather not go through the whole arc searching for them. I don't have time for that, anyway.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 21:00, September 30, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Events

Maybe. If I think there is enough for a page and i have time and patience to do the work of editing a page and adding the necessary references myself as best as I could. Rhavkin (talk) 00:17, November 2, 2019 (UTC)

Still the same amount of work re-reading the chapters, identifying relevant information and adding the references. Rhavkin (talk) 01:06, November 2, 2019 (UTC)

No, We don't know the time it happened, the actual named of those involve, or a clear aftermath. We only know it happened and that the unnamed woman used it to convince Orochi to take the shogunate some time later. You can try building a page in your sandbox and see how much can actually be include there and if you think it is good enough, send me a link and ask again. Rhavkin (talk) 14:02, December 14, 2019 (UTC)

Re:Anime Credit

Possibly, but I'm not sure if it's necessary. The names are already referenced on the articles. Awaikage Talk 18:36, November 14, 2019 (UTC)


I'm not going to write the summaries for you, if that's why you're asking. If you find sections are lacking in information, then take the time to add to what's there rather than removing someone else's work. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 21:04, November 14, 2019 (UTC)

Whether or not I've seen the movie is irrelevant since your edit summaries ("He/She did more than that.") already acknowledge that the information is true. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 22:07, November 14, 2019 (UTC)

Again, if you find sections are lacking in information, then take the time to add to what's there. That includes fixing words that you find misleading. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 23:22, November 14, 2019 (UTC)

I don't care how little there is, you DO NOT replace information with the empty section template unless it is vandalism. A little information is better than no information. In the time you've spent edit warring and talking back and forth about this you could have easily updated at least one character's history. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 01:00, November 15, 2019 (UTC)

Yes. I wrote the summary on the film's page and will work on updates as I have the time. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 07:24, November 15, 2019 (UTC)


I am begging you to answer to the point, why do you add the Confirm template instead of simply adding the information? Rhavkin (talk) 04:24, November 16, 2019 (UTC)


Thank you for the feedback. I started this just as a personal stuff, but it's good to know that it can help the community. If you want to turn this into a project, i will help, but i can't do it all by myself. Ampola (talk) 14:19, November 20, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Age

The timeline is the only way to show a series of events by year. Maybe the births can be split to a subpage since most of them do not affect the story. Rhavkin (talk) 12:11, December 15, 2019 (UTC)

New Forum

Please take part in Forum:Different Artists Renditions. Rhavkin (talk) 08:35, December 23, 2019 (UTC)

Luffy's Relationships

Please stop. You are undoing two things without a reason. The header shouldn't be in the center. Also, "can be necessary" isn't a good enough reason to divert from the standard usage of files on pages. Rhavkin (talk) 19:35, January 1, 2020 (UTC)

Fixing the header and an image on a page doesn't make a page better? Rhavkin (talk) 19:54, January 1, 2020 (UTC)

That is not a valid reason. The contents box are default set to show, and that is what the page should take into account. Personal preferences are just that, personal. Do not drag this into an edit war and talk to and admin or a mod. Rhavkin (talk) 20:11, January 1, 2020 (UTC)

Re:Chapter 963

I assume you are talking about writing the long summary, which you are welcome to do at any time. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 22:47, January 1, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Relationships Split

  1. Any reason you respond to something I started a talk about anywhere other then said talk page?
  2. That should be discussed in a case by case, again, on each of those cases talk pages.

Rhavkin (talk) 19:51, January 5, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Artists

Done; I just uploaded Namie Amuro in EoSI. We already have Tackey and Tsubasa in Crazy Rainbow.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 07:40, January 6, 2020 (UTC)


Just so you'd know, creating a new page for something that was deleted can be considered vandalism. You should have asked me or Filu about why it was deleted on either of our talk pages, and not recreating a bad page without reasoning. Rhavkin (talk) 23:07, January 8, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Grand Line Gallery Template

That would only work if there are portrait images for every location, and how are planning to present the sub location like cities or landmarks? Rhavkin (talk) 15:25, January 18, 2020 (UTC)


Not before I understand your idea, you fixed its problems, and it is accepted by the community. Rhavkin (talk) 11:46, January 19, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Portraits

Umm, I could do that, but you would also be able to, it's pretty simple, just crop the image to a perfect square and then upload with the name + Portrait.png. But I'm not sure it is a good idea, because if we make it square, then it cuts out a large part of the island's image, so its hard in terms of making it look right.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 23:55, January 22, 2020 (UTC)

I don't know how to make a wikitable. sounds hard lol. But I can't make good portraits if the original image is really wide. Like for the Yukiryu Island Infobox. Its dimensions are 404x173. I would need to make it 173x173, which cuts out a good chunk of the image.--Nightmare Pirates (talk) 03:57, January 24, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Scan

Mostly JaiminiBox. Rhavkin (talk) 19:27, January 24, 2020 (UTC)

JaiminiBox. Rhavkin (talk) 21:06, January 24, 2020 (UTC)

Various and multiple bad translation, and delayed uploads. Rhavkin (talk) 21:56, January 24, 2020 (UTC)


Momonosuke affiliation is listed as both the Kozuki Family and the Ninja-Pirate-Mink-Samurai Alliance. Do you think they should be merged as well? Rhavkin (talk) 12:30, January 26, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Families

Since a family influence is determined by their power, of the respect they demand, it would fit better in the overview and\or strength. Rhavkin (talk) 16:31, January 27, 2020 (UTC)

A paragraph in the existing section is enough. Rhavkin (talk) 21:12, January 27, 2020 (UTC)

Edit Summaries

Edit summaries such as this are unacceptable. This is your first warning. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 03:38, January 31, 2020 (UTC)

Also, the Confirm template's main purpose is to be put on statements that you're not sure are true, to encourage the person who added it to confirm it. If you do know that a statement is true, and you know its source, adding the Confirm template is not a productive edit. Did it take long to write up the references on the Shimotsuki Family page? I don't think it took longer than any of the edit wars revolving around your usage of the Confirm template - which, since it's your edit that's being disputed, means the onus is on you to talk it out (though simply adding the references would likely be easier). Your behavior is not productive for the wiki, it has done nothing to prevent false information, and I would invite you to look for better ways to spend your time here, else your behavior is seen as disruptive and a ban forum is made for you. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 03:57, January 31, 2020 (UTC)

You do realize that what you're saying about Rhavkin also applied to you before you finally added the references? Yes, Rhavkin would have been more productive by adding the references instead of undoing your edit, but it wasn't like you were being productive by adding Confirm templates to statements that you KNEW the source of. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 05:03, January 31, 2020 (UTC)

The problem with Rgilbert's refusal to actually add sources instead of the confirm tag goes deeper then that:

  1. User talk:Rgilbert27/Archive 3#Confirm
  2. User talk:Rgilbert27/Archive 4#Confirm again
  3. User talk:Rgilbert27/Archive 4#Wano Confirms
  4. User talk:Rgilbert27#Another "confirm" issue

And no matter how much I try to explain it to him, or try to help if there are questions or misunderstandings, this is just blunt refusal to do any work, to the point it is disruptive to other works. I tried to start referencing all the truly Missing References but it did not get much attention, so I put it on the back burner, and while I asked for the minimal help by adding which statement needs referencing, and despite Rgilbert claim he doesn't know how things work, the refusal to learn is not beneficial to the wiki.

Back to the topic, what references did you think should be added? One of at least one Amatsuki Family member living in Wano, at last one outside of it, at last one of the Shimotsuki Family member living in Wano, and at last one outside of it? Four references for a trivia is too much. You seem to only add the template just for the edit without any thought or reasoning behind it. Rhavkin (talk) 21:53, February 2, 2020 (UTC)

Enma Shrine

Let's not edit war.

  1. The box said "outside of the Flower Capital", hence not in the Flower Capital.
  2. The map showed its location in Hakumai.
  3. The scenery is that of Hakumai.
  4. The next scene have a box that said "Flower Capital", so obviously the scene prior was not in the Flower Capital.

Any questions? Rhavkin (talk) 09:28, February 2, 2020 (UTC)

Ebidu town was never in Kibi, Zoro and Yasu were in Kibi as they traveled toward Ebisu Town in the distance. Rhavkin (talk) 09:53, February 2, 2020 (UTC)

Does it says it now? No, because it was proven wrong. Rhavkin (talk) 10:06, February 2, 2020 (UTC)

The map is enough. Rhavkin (talk) 10:21, February 2, 2020 (UTC)

I already did, and it said I'm right. Rhavkin (talk) 10:33, February 2, 2020 (UTC)

Re: GL Portraits

The discussion is still open on whether or not to use your gallery. Kaido and Rhavkin have suggested a table or a wide list respectively instead, neither of which require portraits. So it's be pointless to upload them right now.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 11:20, February 2, 2020 (UTC)

Chapter 12

Color spread are two pages. Rhavkin (talk) 19:24, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

Where is it sideways? Rhavkin (talk) 19:39, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

Chapter page. Rhavkin (talk) 19:56, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

Yes. Rhavkin (talk) 20:18, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

  1. The wiki page of the chapter. The cover is horizontal.
  2. Colored where? the digitally colored manga? Defiantly not the only one, that the point of that release. The volume release? wasn't colored. The SJ magazine? I highly doubt it, while I don't have to original magazine release, but I am not aware of any full colored chapter in SJ.

Rhavkin (talk) 20:34, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

  1. Look at the image in the chapter page. There are two pages numbers on the bottom! What else do you need?
  2. Can you prove it or is it just your personal observation?

Rhavkin (talk) 21:13, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

  1. If you don't see them I can't help you.
  2. The fact that other mangas have one does not mean One Piece has one, nor that if it does, it is this chapter.

Rhavkin (talk) 21:29, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

Your guesses and memory are irrelevant without proves. Rhavkin (talk) 22:14, February 3, 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Chapter 12. Rhavkin (talk) 05:09, February 4, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Images

If I agree with the necessity for an image, have a good enough source, and time, I might be able to help. Rhavkin (talk) 21:12, February 9, 2020 (UTC)

The village was shown very small on top of an hill, or with the minks walking around so there is not a good image IMO. Since it is very close to the anime adaptation, it might be best to wait a week or two. Rhavkin (talk) 22:02, February 9, 2020 (UTC)

We've never actually seen the port so the image of the scabbards in its ruins should suffice. If there wasn't an existing image however, I would be against uploading one, since even this image doesn't rally shows the port. Rhavkin (talk) 23:27, February 9, 2020 (UTC)

Don't you want to learn how to do it yourself? Rhavkin (talk) 11:16, February 14, 2020 (UTC)

Not necessarily. Rhavkin (talk) 12:27, February 14, 2020 (UTC)

You're not even trying to learn? Rhavkin (talk) 10:58, February 15, 2020 (UTC)

By relaying on other. Don't you want to be able to what ever you want by yourself? Rhavkin (talk) 11:07, February 15, 2020 (UTC)

And were back to the initial topic: Don't you want to learn how to do it yourself? Rhavkin (talk) 11:22, February 15, 2020 (UTC)

Well? Rhavkin (talk) 07:31, February 16, 2020 (UTC)

The longer you take to answer the longer pages will be imageless. Rhavkin (talk) 06:31, February 17, 2020 (UTC)

So is your answer "No, I want someone else to do the work I want to accomplish, even though I could learn how to it myself with the help of fellow users, because..." Rhavkin (talk) 15:12, February 18, 2020 (UTC)

You know, not answering doesn't make you a better editor or a contributor to the fandom. Rhavkin (talk) 15:22, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

What about it? Rhavkin (talk) 18:31, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

To what? The problem is your lack of willing to do it, not how. Do you know how to work with that feature? Are you comfortable with using this tool? Are you planning on using this tool? Is the cropping tool the only problem you had with uploading images? Rhavkin (talk) 18:51, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

What makes you think you need to be "tech-savy" to do this? Rhavkin (talk) 19:07, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

Longer? Yes, but If you'd look in my history, you'll see I was warned and banned several times until I learn how to it properly, and I'm still learning. Coding is the same. In the {{Qref}} talk page, I asked for help, saw that no one responded so I learned some of it myself. From experience, you do not need any special tools to add images. Rhavkin (talk) 19:31, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

You don't need to be. Rhavkin (talk) 20:02, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

Yes. Would you like me to teach you the least techy way to add images? Rhavkin (talk) 20:11, February 20, 2020 (UTC)


No, I didn't forget it. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 00:30, February 11, 2020 (UTC)

Active Discussions

Do not add the template unless there are several opinions from more then two users. Rhavkin (talk) 07:21, February 16, 2020 (UTC)

Re:Long Pages

Don't know. Rhavkin (talk) 06:32, February 17, 2020 (UTC)

Re: 972

No, a scanlation of chapter 972 is out. What do you want from me? Rhavkin (talk) 12:08, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

Stop them from what? Rhavkin (talk) 13:13, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

I honestly don't know what you're talking about? Rhavkin (talk) 13:43, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

Still lost. What are you talking about? Rhavkin (talk) 14:10, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

The date issue was resolve in the talk page, and Fliu is the only one who added chapter notes and they follow the new spoiler rules. Again, what is the problem you are talking about? 15:21, February 20, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Hungry Days

It's a commercial. It does not feature the Straw Hats, but a collection of look-a-likes. Rhavkin (talk) 17:03, February 21, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Yabumi

What's yabumi? Rhavkin (talk) 06:19, February 22, 2020 (UTC)

Were they named in the chapter? Rhavkin (talk) 08:30, February 22, 2020 (UTC)

Who said they have a distinct name for it? Rhavkin (talk) 09:13, February 22, 2020 (UTC)

Do they have unique names for sword, tree, pot, grave, shop, castle, poison, prison... Rhavkin (talk) 09:35, February 22, 2020 (UTC)

It's an arrow with a letter. Not a uniquely named weapon. Rhavkin (talk) 14:23, February 22, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Watermarked

Which episode are they from? You were supposed to add where the images you upload are from, along with licensing and categories, to begin with. I've had to do it for you before. Look at similar images for examples.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 02:10, February 28, 2020 (UTC)

I thought of that, but the movie doesn't show a good view of either items.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 04:00, February 28, 2020 (UTC)

In regards to the reference I made (445) that was a mistake, I meant 845

The information about how to add second episodes in a reference was helpful, I can use that, the issue with adding a second chapter is properly assigning page numbers

AlexanderImAlsoGr8 (talk) 07:22, March 5, 2020 (UTC)


No, listing the game link in the text parameter works just fine. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 21:58, March 11, 2020 (UTC)

Episode Special 1 Image

I'll try to find it, but I don't remember where I found the video.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 23:14, March 16, 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry. I can't find it. I tried googling for it, but the only links I found don't work anymore.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 23:11, March 18, 2020 (UTC)

I think I might have found it, but it's not in English: Also, I am not sure if you can access it due to country restrictions because I used a VPN or a Chrome unblocker extension. Also in case it works, there is a pretty long advertisement before it gets to the video.--Nightmare Pirates (talk) 03:19, April 26, 2020 (UTC)

I found the rest on the same site. Special 2: I can't get onto Special 3 and 4 for some reason though even with the unblocker extension (its called Unblock Youku).Nightmare Pirates (talk) 04:06, April 26, 2020 (UTC)


If you would go to Jibuemon's page, and look at the reference, then go to the chapters he appeared, you would discover that in the second reference, he is seen giving orders to the men. Rhavkin (talk) 12:50, March 23, 2020 (UTC)

  1. As I said, the references section is a list of appearance. If done properly, it has the chapter, specific page(s), and if available the episode, as well as a description.
  2. At the end of the day, all the time Luffy is called captain are "A couple of panels". Instructing the men on how to act, which is what he did in those "couple of panels", is what a leader does.

Rhavkin (talk) 14:00, March 23, 2020 (UTC)

  1. It should. For the most part anyway, ans for all key information. If you feel a certain page lack references, due add them.
  2. I gave the most general example for a reason. I could have just as easily mentioned any fact:
    • Oden cutting Kaido - 1 panel
    • Kaido shoot Oden - 1 panel
    • Kanjuro real name - 1 panel
    • etc.

Rhavkin (talk) 17:01, March 23, 2020 (UTC)

Episode Images

Where do I see that? I only see add categories. I don't see anything like Category:Season 20 Images|Episode 926.--Nightmare Pirates (talk) 22:45, March 23, 2020 (UTC)

Desktop--Nightmare Pirates (talk) 23:34, March 23, 2020 (UTC)

Ah I see it. May I ask what it does though, because when I look at the Season 20 Episode Images category page, it doesn't show any subsection or anything for Episode 926.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 04:05, March 24, 2020 (UTC)

Arlong Lies Defeated?

You asked me to "find new images :for :these :four :here from Episode of East Blue".…

  • …but the links you provided are all the same image & you uploaded a good one yourself.
  • I don't know if there's a template for images with watermarks since they aren't allowed here.
  • Please leave any new messages unrelated to previous ones at the bottom of my talk page. I didn't see your new request at first since you left it under an old headline.
🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 00:00, March 30, 2020 (UTC)
  • Mr. Whatever's version is good.
  • I don't know. As I said, you shouldn't upload watermarked images to begin with.
  • Wy ask me? I only did an Episode 92 version of "Frienship Mark", Cdavymatias did the newer version. I didn't do any of "Angry Eyes"; how am I supposed to know the sources of images I didn't upload?
🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 03:00, March 30, 2020 (UTC)


I think the same rules apply for non-OP images (source, licensing, & category). Since it was something that Oda said himself, it should be okay (we did it for Sanji). You should probably take it to her talk page just to be sure.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 04:00, April 6, 2020 (UTC)

Donquixote JR

Please, stop asking me for sources of images. Again, how am I supposed to know?

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 21:50, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

That was 4 years ago, I don't recall. I probably just cropped it from the Jolly Roger image and used one of the sources listed there. I just skimmed through Episode 629, & you were right about it (it's seen at about 17:35).

BTW, you don't need to put "File:" and ".png" when using the {Rename} template. For example, just put {Rename|New Name} instead of putting {Rename|File:New Name.png}.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 00:51, April 16, 2020 (UTC)
  1. [illegal streaming name]
  2. "By The Way,"
🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 02:20, April 16, 2020 (UTC)

Re:Golden Kagura

That reference didn't align with the info, which as far as I can tell is only presented in 978. I think I'll pass on adding it back tomorrow until the talk page is resolved. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 02:24, April 26, 2020 (UTC)


Why? If you somehow don't know what the pandemic is you can look it up on Google or Wikipedia. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 19:07, April 26, 2020 (UTC)

Non-Canon Staff Users Category

Aight, can you explain your edits on that category a little more? I still don't really understand the difference it makes and would appreciate a full explanation.

And while "wtf" is far from a good edit summary, if someone disputes your edit, it is your responsibility to explain yourself in the edit summary if you add it back. Silently reverting the page back to your version is not OK, and I have seen you do this on multiple pages. Consider this your first warning. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 05:54, May 4, 2020 (UTC)


Hello Rgilbert27. Though I felt frustrated when the edit conflict occurred, I am more concerned with the misuse of the template and with your behavior toward our other contributor, Rhavkin. I am sympathetic to your situation, as I have a cousin who also suffers from Asperger syndrome. I also read your blog, and I appreciate that you wanted to start a conversation to check in with other uses. I only opened the forum because you did not change your use of the Confirm template or your behavior toward Rhavkin when members of staff like Kaido and me asked and later warned you about them. I think that you have good intentions overall with your work here, and you can still make your case in the forum. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 19:24, May 5, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Merged Images

Sorry, I don't know how to make merged images.

I also can't rename File:Gear Fourth Infobox.png since it has been protected so that only users with administrator privileges can move it.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 08:40, May 7, 2020 (UTC)

Protections for editing, moving & uploading are all separate; pages can be made so that normal users can edit but only privileged users can move.

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 07:35, May 8, 2020 (UTC)

Why did you upload a new (& lower quality) file when you could've asked an admin to rename the old 1 for you?

🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 07:55, May 8, 2020 (UTC)
  1. The file has a talk page that needs to be moved with it.
  2. I don't know why I can't move it since content mods should be able to edit/move/upload protected pages.
  3. Any admin will probably do, but Kaido's the one who protected it.
🏴‍☠️👸🏻 (talk) 08:35, May 8, 2020 (UTC)

Re:Hungry Days

You are more than welcome to add additional content. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 07:24, May 13, 2020 (UTC)


Hey Rgilbert. I'm curious, why is my user page linked in your Navibox? Montblanc Noland :: Talk 05:20, May 17, 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying! Montblanc Noland :: Talk 01:30, May 18, 2020 (UTC)

Fair Warning: Displaytitle

Just to give you a fair warning, I am going to remove the "Displaytitle" template from most of the pages it is on. The purpose of that template is not to obscure parenthetical additions to names that are the same as other pages, it is to add characters that cannot normally be a part of the article name and do things like italicize when necessary. Retaining the parenthetical notes on certain page titles aids in user navigation, and there is no need to use Displaytitle to obscure them. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 22:17, May 18, 2020 (UTC)


The issue with that is that draft pages count as personal pages, and images used for personal reasons is not permitted. You have to wait until the pages come into the series before you can upload those images, or find another place to use those images that are not personal. Yata Talk to me 00:38, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

If you can use those images on non-personal pages, I can restore them. But they were left unused for an entire day, I thought they were essentially dead. Yata Talk to me 01:31, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

Linking to draft pages is not enough. They must be used on public pages, and at the time of deletion, they were not. Yata Talk to me 03:05, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

Zombie Images

I would like to ask about User:Rgilbert27/Draft Page/Gallery, as we do not allow uploading images for personal use, and so the longer those images stay on your draft page the more likely they are to be deleted. Are you intending to put these images into an article? Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 00:44, June 3, 2020 (UTC)

So I saw your posts on Yata's talk page on this topic. Unless you are willing to create those sections yourself in the near future, I am going to delete the images. You can keep them stored on your device, and upload them to the wiki when those sections you want are created. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 00:52, June 3, 2020 (UTC)

Your Category

Hwllo Rgilbert. Please stop adding [[:Category:Characters Named Outside The Manga|your category]] to more pages for the time being while its necessity is being discussed. Thank you. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 12:00, June 22, 2020 (UTC)

I understand. Here are the raws of the SBS that show they are the same person. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 12:15, June 22, 2020 (UTC)

Dance Battle

There is no reason to remove the "References" section just because one link broke. There is no reason to do that. It is simply counterproductive. And instead of adding a confirm template, did you try looking for the information online?

You also violated the Referencing Guidelines by adding a Confirm template to Usakkov, Tsunokkov, and Francois' Japanese names. The Japanese os verified, and we don't ever add Confirm templates or references to those. You could've even gone to Google Translate to check if they were valid. I auggest you read the new policy before proceding. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 09:49, June 27, 2020 (UTC)

If you have suggestions for policy changes, you need to consult an admin or make a forum.

I'm not advocating for broken links. I'm asking you to help fix them.

Like I said, we never reference Japanese names. Not sure why you're singling out a few pages. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 11:46, June 27, 2020 (UTC)

You can certainly consult me, but I am not the one who changes the handbook. Personally, I don't think we need a policy on broken links because there are methods to find other sources (either WayBack Machine like I did on the Dance Battle page or finding an alternate source).

They were named in Vivre Card. I added the references to Usakkov and Tsunokkov now, and Kaido added a reference on Francois's page. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 15:19, June 27, 2020 (UTC)


Hey Rgilbert! I wanted to remind you that portraits need to be square. I fixed a few of your recent uploads to match that. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 19:55, June 29, 2020 (UTC)

I just mean that the height and width need to be the same (ex. 150 x 150 instead of 150 x 165). Montblanc Noland :: Talk 09:59, June 30, 2020 (UTC)

Also, we are allowed to source official artwork we don't have pages for. Not everything needs a page. We use external sources often. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 10:43, June 30, 2020 (UTC)

Okay. If you think it should be made, I encourage you to do so. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 13:50, June 30, 2020 (UTC)

Image Sources

Hi, first I want to say thanks for doing the Season ? Episode Images. I sometimes miss updating them when I'm just replacing with cropped images. Second, there's no need to delete duplicate sources. I've noticed that you remove sourcing for some images if they repeat. Like for example if it says Episode 700 twice on the Sources page. That shouldn't be done because the images are supposed to correspond with the order of the sources. If you remove a duplicate source, people won't know where which image comes from.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 23:54, June 30, 2020 (UTC)

Well that's what the sources are for: to find where each image came from. If they are removed, it makes it hard to find where the images came from. And yes, I know some images were miscategorized, that's why I thank you for doing it. I'm just apologizing if I ever miss updating it by accident.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 00:25, July 1, 2020 (UTC)

Also, in my opinion, I don't think a Past section is necessary. The sources are already pretty clear that the ones on the bottom are old ones. I know the sources sometimes get messy (people revert back and forth), but it still gives a general gist of where something came from.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 00:32, July 1, 2020 (UTC)

I get that, but I'm talking about the old sources.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 04:25, July 1, 2020 (UTC)

Sorting OPM

What you are trying to do is pointless. Read Template:Sort notes. Since the pages aren't Word # but Vol.# (without space) it wouldn't identify the number as a number, just digits. Rhavkin (talk) 05:33, July 11, 2020 (UTC)


I really don't understand what point your trying to make. You said there was no source. I repeatedly gave you the source (if you want the specific episodes, then it's possible to find one or two in the sources for the portraits). However, you just keep deleting them and claiming there's no source when I keep mentioning it. Now you say there's no pages, but no pages does not equal unsourced.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 05:07, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

Again, they aren't real names. And I am pretty sure the wiki won't allow them to be made, but that does not mean we go and remove it just because it doesn't have a page. There is no rule on the wiki that says "If no page is made, name must be deleted." The anime credited them as Hyoutauros and Kirintauros. They aren't actual names, so I am not in the position to argue with wiki rules.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 05:19, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean I've been sitting on this for a year and a half. Before I updated them, it said Leopard Centaur and we aren't supposed to translate stuff on wiki. So I put what they are credited as because that is the most accurate. I find there no need to create a page for something in which even myself does not believe is a real name. If you want there to be a page, then you can make it, but it will likely be subject to scrutiny because there will be people that say "This is not a real name." But just because there is no page, does not mean it is not the correct terminology. If anything, you can consider it a subspecies of Centaurs. We can put animal species' names in galleries and they do not need to have their own page.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 05:46, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

Again, I don't think they are allowed to have a page by wiki precedent. Taking it up with me is useless, all I'm stating is the names have sources and there you have it. If you want to bring it up in the talk page for centaurs or wherever that they should have a page, go for it, I'll support that. But you can't force someone to write a page for what isn't allowed. All I am saying is even if there is no page, does not mean you can delete stuff, especially since you kept mentioning sources which was clearly not the problem. That is a really counterproductive way of trying to highlight a completely different issue.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 06:16, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

They are credited in the credits. I cannot show you, you need to look at that yourself like any other character. And again, they are not real names, more like species names. I'm not even sure we allowed to list them on episode or chapter pages, because again (in my opinion) they aren't real names. We don't list stuff like "Mocha's mom" in episode character lists either because they aren't real names.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 06:40, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

No rule against that. If you want, I'll create their own section for them on the Centaur page when I have the time, but it's probably going to be short and go in the trivia section as I don't really want to rewatch or reread Punk Hazard at this point.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 06:54, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

I connected it to Centaur Patrol Unit page and put a quick reference.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 07:03, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

That's good that you made that page, but that one has an actual name. This name is more of a description, but my point is, it is more accurate than Leopard Centaur or Giraffe Centaur because if you direct translate then it would be Leopardtaur and Giraffetaur, especially since even the English versions credited it as Hyoutauros and Kirintauros.--Nightmare Pirates (talk) 07:08, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

Not to jump in the middle of a discussion, and this might not even be related (I haven't read your discussion so far), but as I was trying to say to Rgilbert27, a character name reference shouldn't be on the group page. If there is enough content for a page or section per character, that fine, but if there is not enough for a single paragraph it is better suited elsewhere. Maybe include Luffy meeting then in the group history section and mention their names there and have a reference to both the event and the naming. The members section is used for descriptions in very few times (Super Spot-Billed Duck Troops, Tsumegeri Guards, Heart Pirates, etc.). Rhavkin (talk) 20:53, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

Could you please stop adding random suggestions to talk page discussions? Changing section names on episode pages has nothing to do with Hyoutaurus or Kirintaurus. Please stay on topic. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 00:15, July 14, 2020 (UTC)

Udon Prisoners

There's the rename category feature now, couldn't you have done it - making it unnecessary to add categories to characters and delete the older one - or is it somehow protected? StoopidGuy (talk) 03:38, July 20, 2020 (UTC)

Yes, haha. But I thought letting you know would be positive anyway. StoopidGuy (talk) 03:50, July 20, 2020 (UTC)


Yup, no problem. Cdwp22 (talk) 09:45, July 23, 2020 (UTC)


I have a bot account but it's not an actual bot, just for hiding mass edits from Recent changes. Why? Awaikage Talk 15:31, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

Removed them. Awaikage Talk 16:22, July 25, 2020 (UTC)

Re:J-WORLD Tokyo

There are no external links because the park closed and has no website. And no, I was not planning on making a page for the park on other wikis. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 23:53, July 29, 2020 (UTC)

Yes, the sources I used have information about the Dragon Ball and Naruto areas. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 01:46, July 30, 2020 (UTC)

Apparently, I guess. That is the term the source used. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 01:50, July 31, 2020 (UTC)


Due to a lack of a digitally-accessible version of the image, I have to take a picture of the TV screen by myself. This is taken from the eyecatcher of Episode 531 of the Filipino dub.

WikiText Signatures are So W***a (Right, Ed?) 02:04, August 3, 2020 (UTC) (Right, Ed?) 02:04, August 3, 2020 (UTC)​ (Right, Ed?) 02:04, August 3, 2020 (UTC)​

Referencing Concerns

Funny. I don't think you were that concerned about referencing for whoever wrote that personality section previously.

I'll put them later. Rewriting articles to make them presentable is difficult, double so if I have to interrupt myself to check the exact chapter and page something happens. Triple so when there were no references to begin with, so I can't just edit them. It's a time-consuming task.

At least I'm trying to do something for those articles instead of bothering the work of others. It's frankly ridiculous when many of those articles contain false info, contradictions and blatant mistakes, but your concern is with references. I know it's important to source, but this stance is almost hypocritical when everything's so badly written, with many articles needing rework. KingCannon (talk) 02:29, August 7, 2020 (UTC)

Re: non-canon

They are already put like that, those edits on the category don't change the code. Cracker-Kun (talk) 17:34, August 13, 2020 (UTC)


Yes I know how to leave a reference.

A double {, followed by the Ref. Then you put in a divider |, whatever that thing is actually called.

You type “name=c“ followed by the chapter number. You add dividers and do the same for the page number of the chapter that the info can be found on, as well as the episode number if it’s already been in the anime. Substituting the “c” for a “p” and “e” respectively.

Another divider and a sentence describing the reference.

Finally, a double } to close it. (GoldenOath20 (talk) 06:18, August 19, 2020 (UTC))

Reference II: Electric Boogaloo

You're going to have to be more specific on that count... as far as I know I've stuck references to 95% of everything I've added so far. Is it about the 4Kids dub commentary? I might fall a bit behind on those because I'm not sure of the proper way to reconcile the ref system with 4Kids' f'ed-up episode numbering. RubberLotus (talk) 05:32, August 20, 2020 (UTC)

Amber Lead Syndrome

Why did you remove the Sicknesses Category from the Amber Lead Syndrome redirect page? Look at Talk:Amber Lead#Sicknesses Category and discuss there why you're against that decision.StoopidGuy (talk) 11:38, August 26, 2020 (UTC)

Why keep the one that doesn’t look like shanks.. it’s literally the one from ep 8 --Gol D theories (talk) 03:15, August 28, 2020 (UTC)

Images source and category

Sorry for all the trouble, i've fix it. Phiffou (talk) 12:53, September 13, 2020 (UTC+2)


Did an admin give you the go ahead to remove the references? Dragonus Nesha (talk) 04:30, September 14, 2020 (UTC)


I mean, you could include a reference by their name next to the SBS reference that notes that they were also named in an episode. But I don't really think the page gains anything by mentioning that they were first named in an anime episode, unless there is a discrepancy which there isn't in this instance. What's important is giving a source for the character's name, and the SBS is a much better source than anime credits. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 14:20, September 15, 2020 (UTC)

What confusion? Not mentioning the episode doesn't hurt any page because all the episode provided was the name, and we now have a canon source for the name. What does it impede us from doing? Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 14:36, September 15, 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean by other pages being overlooked? I still don't see why it is necessary. There is nothing major about a character first being named in a non-canon source before being named in a canon one; it's happened to over 3 dozen characters. At the end of the day, the aim is to provide a source for the recently named characters, and the SBS is far better than the anime in achieving that goal. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 17:20, September 15, 2020 (UTC)

Why is a character being named by a non-canon source and then a canon source significant? I still fail to see how that necessitates mentioning. If a character was named in the manga, it really makes no difference if they were named in the anime beforehand, unless the anime name was different. If they were named in the anime but not the manga/SBS, they'll get a page with the category you linked until they are named in canon. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 18:43, September 15, 2020 (UTC)

Your talk about "repeating history" creates the impression that some sort of issue occurred with this topic in the past. Correct me if I have forgotten, but I do not recall this having been an issue at any point. As of now, we have a pretty good system: categorize the canon characters named in the anime, remove said category once they get named in a canon source. Can you give me clear and concrete reasons why we should record instances of noncanon name source -> canon name source? Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 04:50, September 16, 2020 (UTC)

Well, if you find the right words feel free to relay them to me. And I haven't seen anyone except you who thinks there is a problem. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 06:20, September 16, 2020 (UTC)


Done. Yata Talk to me 03:25, September 20, 2020 (UTC)

Minor Characters

Please limit the amount of really minor characters you put into the galleries. One or two notable unknowns might be okay, but if they appeared in one scene, and are multiple, that detracts from the value of the gallery. Also, portraits need to be square, such as 500 by 500, or 395 by 395, or 678 by 678.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 21:01, September 20, 2020 (UTC)

Depending on what kind of program you're using, they should show it somewhere. Like when you are selecting where to crop, there should be numbers somewhere.--Nightmare Pirates (talk) 21:09, September 20, 2020 (UTC)

Also, just because they appear doesn't mean they are notable. They should at the very least have multiple appearances if you're going to add so many characters. For example in the Water 7 Gallery, there is no way the elevator girl or the vendor is notable.Nightmare Pirates (talk) 21:15, September 20, 2020 (UTC)

File:Rittonto's Mole Portrait.png isn't square. Check the dimensions of images before you upload them. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 23:37, September 21, 2020 (UTC)

Confirm Tag Additions

Why do you think edits like these are productive?

Are you not caught up with the series?

Have you not read the chapter that was released today?

If you know the source, is it not better for the wiki for you to add the reference as opposed to the Confirm tag? It takes about an equivalent amount of work, especially if the chapter that the information comes from is already referenced on the page.

This behavior does nothing for the wiki and is not acceptable. Consider this a warning. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 19:02, September 27, 2020 (UTC)

Punk Hazard

The box you're pointing at for "Center Lake" uses the same Japanese text as the box at the start of Chapter 671. It's a description of the lake and its placement; it's not a title. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 01:36, September 29, 2020 (UTC)

Telling People to Add References

Hi Rgilbert. I appreciate your commitment to the wiki being referenced, but I don't think you need to message users to tell them to add them or ask why they didn't include them. That's what us admins and mods are for. If you want to check in with people from time to time in case they forget to do things (like how you reminded me to add/update categories for image uploads), that's fine and appreciated, but I want you to spend more time on fun edits :). Montblanc Noland :: Talk 23:31, October 5, 2020 (UTC)


Your recent edit has been construed as vandalism. Please check our Vandalism Guidelines, and General Rules to avoid making further problems on the One Piece Wiki that could possibly lead to a ban. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Thank you.

Removing descriptions from images is vandalism and there is no reason for it. SeaTerror (talk) 19:23, October 6, 2020 (UTC)

Two Week Block

You have been blocked for two weeks following your response to SeaTerror's message. Not only did you remove the message (which is obviously prohibited), you proceeded to ignore him and continue removing image descriptions. This is the straw that breaks the camel's back with you breaking wiki rules and being disruptive to the community. The two week ban builds on the one week ban you had last year for essentially the same reasons. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 04:49, October 7, 2020 (UTC)

You two are just haters as I've still yet to hear back from Kaizoku and I would like at least still be able to edit my draft page. Rgilbert27 (talk) 09:18, October 7, 2020 (UTC)

You referring to people who disagree with your changes as "haters" is the very essence of the issue with your attitude toward the community. By all means feel free to call out people for opposing you without a reason, but calling others "haters" is nothing more than a personal attack which is not acceptable here. And there is very much a reason for why your behavior toward ST was unacceptable.

Your response when ST warns you for removing information should not be to contact Kaizoku-Hime. They are a content mod, not an arbiter. If you wished to challenge ST's warning, you should have replied to him presenting your reasons for wanting to remove image information sections, and created a forum regarding it. You did respond to ST, but went off in an entirely different direction (in what world does new images not having info sections justify you removing them from other images?) For as many edit wars as you have been in in your three years here it is baffling how you still don't seem to understand our Editing Conduct and Discussion Guidelines. For your own sake you really need to learn how to approach people who are in conflict with you. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 16:42, October 7, 2020 (UTC)

Re: Merged Images

Can't grantee anything. Some shots can be merged and some can't. Which were you thinking about? Rhavkin (talk) 07:16, October 9, 2020 (UTC)

Removing Image Descriptions

You were blocked for ignoring warnings against removing image descriptions and yet you are continuing to do it afterwards? Seriously? What do you think ignoring warnings will result in? Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 16:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Like this. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 17:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Re: Opening Narration Images

This is not how openings, endings, eyecatchers, and\or end cards images are sourced. Rhavkin (talk) 07:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Unproductive Edits

Stop changing "references" to "References", especially when it's the only change you make. It is not a productive edit as it changes nothing regarding the page and only serves to clog the edit log. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 20:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Stop resorting to edit wars to voice your disagreements; use Talk Pages to more effectively communicate your questions and concerns. I get that you're upset that your new Zoan categorization was removed, but that is no excuse to go back into those articles and add unnecessary capitalization. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Because it's a wholly unnecessary change to the coding. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 17:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Yes, fixing coding is part of the editing process. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 18:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

If it's not a problem, then why do you feel the need to capitalize the r? Dragonus Nesha (talk) 18:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Why should they be forced to match when they're different coding styles? And you shouldn't be recreating categories that were previously deleted. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

What? You're the one who took issue with the basic coding and decided to capitalize it. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

OP Wiki guide and Fandom guide. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 20:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)


Then draft/make it, and maybe it'd fit on the wiki. It doesn't have to be a one or the other thing. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 04:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Series Notes

Users may not care what I leave on here while I'm Blocked, but as a reminder I think there should be a discussion about adding Series Notes sections to media outside of chapters, volumes and episodes that have been left unknown but on the pages referenced. Along with that, out of order from the others, a highlighted side note to keep track of the progression of time following the story. Rgilbert27 (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Images categorizing

Hey, I've been going over some special pages and the Special:UncategorizedFiles, long story short, all the images left are anime images and I don't want for us to do the work twice, so when convenient, add the categories per your project. Thanks. Rhav-bot (talk) 08:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


Three may have been the limit of what was visible in the ToC before, but I don't think the subheader levels had that limit. Five levels is the maximum. Awaikage Talk 16:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Example of what? Awaikage Talk 16:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

I just tested it with the editor preview. After five levels it breaks. Awaikage Talk 16:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Look at your talk page history before this edit. Rhavkin (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Here. Rhavkin (talk) 17:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

What do you mean by "Acceptable?"? Did you see the edit? Did you understand how the fifth level of sub header look like on a page? Giving that level 2 is the section, do you understand why only levels 3 and 4 were used so far, making it three levels of subheaders? Did you even look at the sections of the pages you mentioned or just the ToCs? The section's headers are bearly noticeable. Rhavkin (talk) 03:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Again, I'm not sure the fifth level is good at all. When the header is smaller than the text it is hard to follow when it starts or ends other than the ToC. Rhavkin (talk) 06:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

What don't you get about not using fifth branch? Rhavkin (talk) 07:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Don't be stupid. If a page have something that shouldn't have been there, it doesn't mean it's acceptable on other pages. Rhavkin (talk) 05:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Re: Subcategories

No. Each wiki has it's own rules. How Categories works here does not mean that is how it should work anywhere else. Rhavkin (talk) 03:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

You are talking about another wiki. Each wiki has it's own rules, including rules for categorizing categories. A link wouldn'thelp since knowing what you are taking about doesn'thelp with solving it. Rhavkin (talk) 06:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Re:Bounty Poster Images

They are fine with me personally, it's an acceptable tradeoff between the watermarks and the increased level of detail/completeness of the bounty posters. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 05:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Re:Special Images

My source is secret ;) (Hint: I googled the specials) Montblanc Noland :: Talk 15:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

The full names of the specials. They come up on YouTube. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 17:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Re:Great Jipangu

Hey Rgilbert. Another user has plans to make that, so I'm letting him handle it. Cheers! Montblanc Noland :: Talk 02:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Re:Eiichiro Oda Comments

I could look into it at some point but it's not a priority. You're free to try, since you've already been adding other content there. Awaikage Talk 19:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Portrait Categories

Hey Rgilbert. Why did you decide to change how we categorize portraits? There was nothing wrong with the old way of doing it, and the edits have clogged up the Recent Changes feed. I'll be addressing the same thing with Rhavkin, because this kind of change should've been discussed with at least a mod/admin, if not in a forum. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 21:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

My bad Rgilbert, I appreciate you fixing the categories' grammar. I'll comment in the forum. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 01:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Re:Game Differences

I don't understand what you're trying to ask. Changes to plot in games are included in Trivia. Does that explain? If not, let me know. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 01:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I understand now. I agree with adding plot differences to the game pages, but I hesitate to put them on individual character pages. Pirate Warriors 4 has a lot of plot changes, including an original story set in Wano, that we can catalogue on that game's page. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 02:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


I saw that you had removed descriptions from the image summaries. Weren't you warned multiple times about doing that? Dragonus Nesha (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your category project was untouched. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 15:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

They are still there and functional. Do you not see them on the page? It might be something wrong with your browser then. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Like I said, this sounds like an issue with your browser. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Admirals Category

A Marine Admiral (Taishō) is not the same occupation as the admiral of a fleet (Teitoku), even though we translate them as the same word. Thus, please do not put the two positions in the same category. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 07:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


Hey Rgilbert! Not sure which crossovers you're talking about, since most of the ones in this category have all of the crossover franchises' info included. I know you've mentioned J-WORLD Tokyo to me in the past, but users from other wikis are more than welcome to use the same sources I did on their sites. I'm not particularly inclined to do so when I have plenty of work to do here. If you mean something else, let me know. Thanks! Montblanc Noland :: Talk 03:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


It doesn't because it isn't a video game. It is just an app. I put the template on the page while I decide what is an adequate solution. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 01:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Stop Please

I've reread several arcs in order to clean up and organize articles. One Piece is a gigantic work and many times I've had to go back and forth between articles and the manga to confirm and fix things. It's a very complicated job and I cannot be expected to remember every page or have the time to check on it, but I know what I write. I do not insert fake info and have a good history of contributions.

Your edits are not productive, they're obstructive and arbitrary. You completely ignore the rest of the article just to have specific pieces of info requiring confirmation. You're just getting in the way and adding nothing of importance. After all, what's the point of citation needed when the vast majority of old articles don't have references or are stubs? Plus, you keep trying to act like an armchair mod despite having no power and being banned multiple times.

I'm just asking to not get so bullish on citations. Please, understand that I'm not an omniscient reader.KingCannon (talk) 01:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Similar to the aforementioned edit war (which will not go notice if your ban forum is reopened), I reviewed the Swordsman Infobox exchange and it looks pretty rude when you respond to a newer user's comment with "Wrong." when you are in fact the one who is incorrect. Maybe that was not your intention, but it comes off as disagreeable. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 00:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Re:New Pages

I'm not aware of a Dream page existing in the past, and I don't think it's article-worthy. Pirate King could be considered at some point, but it seems sufficiently covered on the Pirate article right now. I believe I've already opposed the creation of a History subpage for the Straw Hat Pirates because the story arcs are their history. Awaikage Talk 09:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

There are no records of a page titled "Dreams". The Straw Hat Pirates are in fact the focus of the story, meaning the history would just be retelling the arc summaries except removing the context provided by other characters. That's why they have the subpage Actions and Locations Visited instead of a conventional history page. And that's how it should be. Awaikage Talk 10:37, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Re:Jail Island Pages

I am not generally opposed to the creation of pages for the Jail Island towns/prisons, but I do expect for you to fill out the necessary sections if you wish to create them and not just leave them as stubs. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 04:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Gallery Status Symbols

Please do not edit the gallery templates *just* to capitalize the status template names, as that makes no change to the templates and spams wiki activity. For the most part you have made other edits to the templates in addition to the capitalization, so there's no issue with that; I just wanted to make this clear after seeing a few edits that only had capitalization changes. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 01:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Again, please do not edit galleries just to capitalize templates. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 16:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


Did you ask anyone about changing Past to Biography before you started? Not trying to police your edits, but I don't agree with the change. Montblanc Noland :: Talk 17:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Adding the subheading to one-section Histories is unnecessary. It doesn't aid in navigating articles and simply lengthens the TOC. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Re: Gender

other then Kiku and Yamato, every character was either male, female, or okama. A category for two page is not allowed. Rhavkin (talk) 06:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Dellinger gender was never in question. He only wears heels. And okama is already a category. Rhavkin (talk) 08:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

TBH, I think this will cause more problems than solve any. Dellinger aside, Yamato has been addressed as female by Oda alone, not by any character after talking to Yamato, and Kiku identify as a female but speak about herself in male pronouns. It seems to me both character aren't non binary, Kiku stating to be a women at heart and Yamato keep referring to themselves as male, and both are referred to as such by their peers, seems like more of a readers discussion then categorizing characters. Rhavkin (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Jail Island Town Pages

I have turned the pages for the Jail Island towns and villages into redirects and moved their information back to the Jail Island page. As I said earlier, I do not oppose the creation of those pages in general. However, aside from adding a couple small location sections and creating residents galleries, you did not add hardly anything to those pages other than copy-pasting the brief location descriptions that I had wrote, leaving some description sections empty, and leaving all History sections empty. Additionally, you left the location sections on the Jail Island page completely blank save for a link to the articles. None of that is acceptable. And I can understand pages being a work in progress, but you created these pages over a month ago and then did not touch them again after that. If you wish to revive these pages in the future, you must take the time to make them more complete, and do not remove content from the Jail Island page (in other articles for islands with locations that have their own pages, we still have descriptions of those locations on the island page). Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 00:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Vivre Card

You could go to AP forums thread or any forum like that and look for anyone who uploaded the files (like Redon) and ask them. This is what I found, but I did not check its quality. Rhavkin (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


Keep in mind that we already have a listing for "Residence". If a character's current residence is the same as where they were born, there is no need to list it twice. Awaikage Talk 16:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your New User Pages

The user pages you are currently in the process of making are currently in the Main namespace; they need to be in the User namespace. Please fix this ASAP. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 00:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


First, you're supposed to contact an admin or mod before creating and adding new categories to several pages. It does not appear that you did so.

Second, creating whole new categories to exclude one or two characters is a bad use of categories. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Neither point addresses what I brought up as issues with those categories. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 14:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Re:Splitting pages

I think you've misunderstood something. Appearances meant the "Appearance" section. Awaikage Talk 15:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)


I am not sure why we are having this issue considering how long you have been here and how involved you have been in category edits, but the rules are very clear: all subcategories must have no fewer than five pages. So I'm not quite understanding of why you have created multiple categories for subgroups which have fewer than five members.

Other things:

  • For subgroup names which aren't exclusively indicative of a single group, the group's name needs to be included as well in order to prevent confusion; e.g. Category:Administration needs to be Category:Buggy's Delivery Administration, Category:Army Commanders needs to be Category:Revolutionary Army Commanders, and so on.
  • And obviously, I hope you are actually going to add pages to these newly created categories, lest they all be deleted.

Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Of course, just a reminder not to leave those categories high and dry.

And if you want that exception to happen you're gonna have to go to forum. Personally I don't see a point, it's not usually like the parent categories are so overflowing with pages that we need to categorize subgroups with a couple of people. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Again, if a subgroup name is not clearly indicative of the larger group, the group's name needs to be included as well. "Elite Officer" might have only been used with the Donquixote Pirates as of now, but it's not indicative on its own and could easily be used again elsewhere. And don't get me started on "Administration". Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

More Unproductive Edits

Again, changing capitalization of coding (e.g. status, qref) is frivolous by itself, as it isn't correcting any mistake and doesn't contribute to the article in any meaningful way. If you're not making a substantial edit, then don't make the edit. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 15:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Re:Former Sun Pirates

Yeah, I counted him; there are four pages (Aladine, Praline, Tiger, Wadatsumi) in that category now, so it's too few for a split. No, adding a subcategory doesn't count toward the page number. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)


You're supposed to ask an admin before performing large scale recategorizations. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Also, there aren't enough for this split because you plan to leave the main category (Merfolk) empty. Dragonus Nesha (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Can you rephrase that question? Dragonus Nesha (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Gallery Pirate Templates Category

I will handle the rest of the templates with my bot, so the activity log doesn't get flooded. Thanks, Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 04:22, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your Edits

When making large quantities of minor edits, please mark them as minor so that they can be filtered out of Recent Changes if necessary. Kaido King of the Beasts (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

The editor has a checkbox you can click that says "This is a minor edit". Alternatively, you can go to My Preferences, the Editing tab, and under Editor check the box that says "Mark all edits minor by default" before starting. Though edits that only consist of adding a single digit like that should ideally be done with a bot. Awaikage Talk 21:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your projects tend to be somewhat controversial, so I think it's best if you request someone else to run a bot. On that note, I finished the rest of these edits just now with KageBot. Awaikage Talk 22:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

What do you mean? Isn't that what these edits already accomplish? Awaikage Talk 09:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

All of those should be properly sorted now, though it might take time to update. This only required embedding Template:Sort to the Chapter Box and Episode Box templates.

PS I do not have the volume in my possession, so I do not know how they handled the color spread.

Awaikage Talk 13:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


Can you give me a source for the word section being written on parts of the institute? I didn't see that, but I also wasn't looking for it. 棟/Tou means Building, "section" seems like a very awkward translation of it. I checked the official translations and VIZ calls them "Structure A", etc. and Funimation calls them "Building A", etc. But again if the word section is written on the walls or something somewhere then I'm fine with changing it back. DewClamChum (talk) 03:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Well, I'm 100% sure neither VIZ nor Funimation use "Section A, B," etc. in the actual dialogue. I would be against using Section unless it's written in English text somewhere in the original Japanese, otherwise I don't think it's a good translation of 棟. DewClamChum (talk) 07:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)